Suppr超能文献

开放与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者总失血量与隐性失血量的比较

Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Zhang Hui, Chen Ze-Xin, Sun Ze-Ming, Jiang Chao, Ni Wen-Fei, Lin Yan, Wu Yao-Sen

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:739-743. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.113. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the volume of hidden blood loss (HBL) and compared perioperative blood loss between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF).

METHODS

Forty-eight patients who were treated with MI-TLIF and 59 patients treated with O-TLIF were enrolled in this study. Patients' height, weight, and preoperative and postoperative hematocrit (Hct) were recorded and used to calculate total blood loss (TBL) according to the Gross formula. Each patient's HBL was calculated. The data were further analyzed by the Student t test and the χ test.

RESULTS

The visible blood loss (VBL) was 186 ± 95 mL in the MI-TLIF; however, the HBL (423 ± 233 mL; 66.5 ± 16.1% of TBL) was twice the VBL. The VBL in the O-TLIF group was 471 ± 147 mL, and the HBL was 271 ± 223 mL (31.3 ± 23.9% of TBL). Although TBL in MI-TLIF (602 ± 251 mL) was less than in O-TLIF (742 ± 275 mL), the HBL was significantly higher (P < 0.01). No difference in postoperative blood loss was observed between the 2 groups. Seven and 10 patients had preoperative anemia in the MI-TLIF group and the O-TLIF group, respectively, and 32 and 45 postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

HBL is seriously underestimated and accounts for a large percentage of TBL in both MI-TLIF and O-TLIF. A correct understanding of HBL can ensure patient safety and improve postoperative rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

本研究检测了隐性失血(HBL)量,并比较了微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)和开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(O-TLIF)的围手术期失血量。

方法

本研究纳入了48例行MI-TLIF治疗的患者和59例行O-TLIF治疗的患者。记录患者的身高、体重以及术前和术后的血细胞比容(Hct),并根据Gross公式用于计算总失血量(TBL)。计算每位患者的HBL。数据进一步采用Student t检验和χ检验进行分析。

结果

MI-TLIF组的显性失血量(VBL)为186±95 mL;然而,HBL为423±233 mL(占TBL的66.5±16.1%),是VBL的两倍。O-TLIF组的VBL为471±147 mL,HBL为271±223 mL(占TBL的31.3±23.9%)。尽管MI-TLIF组的TBL(602±251 mL)低于O-TLIF组(742±275 mL),但其HBL显著更高(P<0.01)。两组术后失血量无差异。MI-TLIF组和O-TLIF组分别有7例和10例患者术前贫血,术后分别为32例和45例。

结论

HBL被严重低估,在MI-TLIF和O-TLIF中均占TBL的很大比例。正确认识HBL可确保患者安全并改善术后康复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验