Suppr超能文献

问题的核心:平板支撑表现与下背部疼痛

The Core of the Issue: Plank Performance and Pain in the Lower Back.

作者信息

Eimiller Kira, LeFevre Leann, Robarge Catherine, Strano Cara, Tarbrake Kelsey, Wittmann Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Scott Bieler College of Health Professions, Daemen University, Amherst, NY 14031, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):3926. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113926.

Abstract

: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Core stabilization exercises such as the plank are often prescribed in rehabilitation settlings to improve neuromuscular control and spinal support. However, it remains unclear whether plank performance -accurately reflects trunk function or disability in individuals with LBP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between plank endurance and low back pain in adults. : A cross-sectional study was conducted with 117 adults aged 20-61 years (mean 26.0 ± 9.3), including both individuals with and without LBP. Participants completed a plank endurance test and the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI). A subset of fifty-four participants with LBP also completed single-leg bridge tests to assess posterior chain endurance. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests to compare plank times by LBP status, logistic regression to evaluate predictors of LBP, and correlation analyses to examine associations between the bridge-to-plank ratio and MODI scores. : Contrary to the initial hypothesis, individuals with LBP demonstrated significantly longer plank hold times than those without (U = 1861.00, = 0.036). Logistic regression indicated that the overall model was statistically significant (χ = 12.39, = 0.030), but plank duration was not an independent predictor of LBP ( = 0.070). Among participants with LBP, a higher bridge-to-plank ratio, reflecting relatively greater posterior chain endurance, was significantly associated with lower disability scores (Pearson r = -0.31, = 0.023; Spearman ρ = -0.32, = 0.018). : These findings suggest that, while plank duration differs by LBP status, longer plank times may not indicate lower risk or severity of back pain. A greater balance of posterior chain to anterior core endurance may be more intricately linked to reduced disability, highlighting the importance of comprehensive core assessment and training strategies in rehabilitation.

摘要

下背痛(LBP)是全球致残的主要原因。诸如平板支撑之类的核心稳定性训练常在康复治疗中被采用,以改善神经肌肉控制和脊柱支撑。然而,平板支撑表现是否能准确反映下背痛个体的躯干功能或残疾状况仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估成年人平板支撑耐力与下背痛之间的关系。

对117名年龄在20 - 61岁(平均26.0±9.3岁)的成年人进行了一项横断面研究,包括有下背痛和无下背痛的个体。参与者完成了平板支撑耐力测试和改良奥斯维斯特里残疾指数(MODI)。54名下背痛参与者的一个子集还完成了单腿桥测试,以评估后链耐力。统计分析包括曼 - 惠特尼U检验,以比较有下背痛状况的平板支撑时间;逻辑回归,以评估下背痛的预测因素;以及相关分析,以检验桥与平板支撑比例和MODI评分之间的关联。

与最初的假设相反,有下背痛的个体表现出比无下背痛个体显著更长的平板支撑保持时间(U = 1861.00,P = 0.036)。逻辑回归表明总体模型具有统计学意义(χ² = 12.39,P = 0.030),但平板支撑持续时间不是下背痛的独立预测因素(P = 0.070)。在有下背痛的参与者中,反映相对更强后链耐力的更高桥与平板支撑比例与更低残疾评分显著相关(皮尔逊r = -0.31,P = 0.023;斯皮尔曼ρ = -0.32,P = 0.018)。

这些发现表明,虽然平板支撑持续时间因下背痛状况而异,但更长的平板支撑时间可能并不表明背痛风险或严重程度更低。后链与前核心耐力的更好平衡可能与残疾减少更复杂地相关联,突出了康复中综合核心评估和训练策略的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c06/12155697/1f73e82c4995/jcm-14-03926-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验