Mendes Joana, Mendes José Manuel, Coelho Lara, Aroso Carlos, Brizuela-Velasco Aritza, Esteves José L, Manzanares-Céspedes Maria Cristina
UNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), Cooperativa de Ensino Superior e Politécnico Universitário-CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
Human Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 26;18(11):2490. doi: 10.3390/ma18112490.
(1) Background: In order to conduct in vitro studies regarding muco-supported dentures, it is necessary to have a simulation model that simulates the oral mucosa, as it is the main influencing factor for their retention and stabilisation. The aim of this study is to perform tensile and wettability tests in three different elastomers to identify the best material for simulating the oral mucosa. (2) Methods: A tensile test was performed according to ISO 527-1 and a compressive test was performed according to ISO 604:2002, at a constant speed of 10 mm/min. The E-modulus was calculated. A wettability test was performed according to ISO 19403-2. Shore A hardness was measured according to ISO 868:2003. All values were compared with the oral mucosa data. (3) Results: Tensile E-modulus calculation revealed no significant difference between Molloplast B and EXA'lence Light Body. The mean drop angle calculation revealed no significant difference between Ufi Gel SC and Molloplast B. The compression E-modulus showed significant differences for Ufi Gel SC and EXA'lence Light Body, while Molloplast B showed no significant deviation. Ufi Gel SC has a similar Shore A hardness to the other materials. (4) Conclusions: Molloplast B and Ufi Gel SC are the most similar elastomers to the alveolar mucosa.
(1) 背景:为了进行关于黏膜支持式义齿的体外研究,有必要建立一个模拟口腔黏膜的模型,因为口腔黏膜是影响义齿固位和稳定的主要因素。本研究的目的是对三种不同的弹性体进行拉伸和润湿性测试,以确定模拟口腔黏膜的最佳材料。(2) 方法:按照ISO 527-1进行拉伸试验,按照ISO 604:2002进行压缩试验,恒定速度为10 mm/min。计算弹性模量。按照ISO 19403-2进行润湿性试验。按照ISO 868:2003测量邵氏A硬度。所有数值均与口腔黏膜数据进行比较。(3) 结果:拉伸弹性模量计算显示,Molloplast B和EXA'lence Light Body之间无显著差异。平均接触角计算显示,Ufi Gel SC和Molloplast B之间无显著差异。Ufi Gel SC和EXA'lence Light Body的压缩弹性模量存在显著差异,而Molloplast B无显著偏差。Ufi Gel SC的邵氏A硬度与其他材料相似。(4) 结论:Molloplast B和Ufi Gel SC是与牙槽黏膜最相似的弹性体。