• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析数字仪表盘对年轻人预防性健康行为的影响。

Unpacking Digital Dashboards' Influence on Preventive Health Behavior Among Young Adults.

作者信息

Craciun Georgiana, Kane Aimee A, Pike Jacqueline C

机构信息

Palumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 28;13(11):1279. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111279.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13111279
PMID:40508891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12154442/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for digital tools that support public health decision-making and behavior change. Dashboards became a primary method for communicating infectious disease data. However, their influence on preventive health behaviors (PHBs) is not well understood-especially among young adults. This group is less likely to adhere to PHBs, but highly familiar with online tools. Two experimental studies were conducted with young adult participants (200 in Study 1, 228 in Study 2) who viewed the same COVID-19 data in dashboards with or without actionable components. Participants were randomly assigned to different dashboard conditions to measure, on seven-point Likert scales, their PHB intentions and perceptions of behavioral control, attitudes, norms, and risk. The actionable dashboard interventions, designed using the theory of planned behavior, included dynamic behavioral guidance and risk level visualizations. Actionable dashboards versus basic dashboards significantly increased PHB intentions ( = 0.84, < 0.001, Study 1). Dynamic behavioral guidance was the key dashboard component influencing PHB intentions ( = 0.61, = 0.005, Study 2). Parallel mediation analysis testing norms, attitudes, behavioral control, and perceived risk against one another found that only norms explained the link between the dashboard intervention and PHB intentions (B = 0.18 and 0.19). Findings suggest that actionable dashboards can effectively promote PHB by influencing psychosocial beliefs. These dashboards provide context and guidance, making risky situations more manageable and directing individuals to appropriate preventive actions. Public health professionals should consider incorporating behavioral guidance into community health dashboards to improve their effectiveness.

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了对支持公共卫生决策和行为改变的数字工具的需求。仪表板成为传达传染病数据的主要方式。然而,其对预防性健康行为(PHB)的影响尚不清楚,尤其是在年轻人中。这一群体不太可能坚持预防性健康行为,但对在线工具非常熟悉。对年轻成年参与者(研究1中有200人,研究2中有228人)进行了两项实验研究,这些参与者在有或没有可操作组件的仪表板中查看相同的新冠数据。参与者被随机分配到不同的仪表板条件下,用七点李克特量表测量他们的预防性健康行为意图以及对行为控制、态度、规范和风险的认知。使用计划行为理论设计的可操作仪表板干预措施包括动态行为指导和风险水平可视化。与基本仪表板相比,可操作仪表板显著提高了预防性健康行为意图(研究1中β = 0.84,p < 0.001)。动态行为指导是影响预防性健康行为意图的关键仪表板组件(研究2中β = 0.61,p = 0.005)。对规范、态度、行为控制和感知风险进行相互比较的平行中介分析发现,只有规范解释了仪表板干预与预防性健康行为意图之间的联系(B = 0.18和0.19)。研究结果表明,可操作仪表板可以通过影响心理社会信念有效地促进预防性健康行为。这些仪表板提供了背景和指导,使危险情况更易于管理,并引导个人采取适当的预防行动。公共卫生专业人员应考虑将行为指导纳入社区健康仪表板,以提高其有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/04a8df33dfa1/healthcare-13-01279-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/11600feb0090/healthcare-13-01279-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/b485b9b18b3d/healthcare-13-01279-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/2d6c9842bcc1/healthcare-13-01279-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/c817ffb655a4/healthcare-13-01279-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/cfa347b2cd99/healthcare-13-01279-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/04a8df33dfa1/healthcare-13-01279-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/11600feb0090/healthcare-13-01279-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/b485b9b18b3d/healthcare-13-01279-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/2d6c9842bcc1/healthcare-13-01279-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/c817ffb655a4/healthcare-13-01279-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/cfa347b2cd99/healthcare-13-01279-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae6/12154442/04a8df33dfa1/healthcare-13-01279-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Unpacking Digital Dashboards' Influence on Preventive Health Behavior Among Young Adults.剖析数字仪表盘对年轻人预防性健康行为的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 28;13(11):1279. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111279.
2
Features Constituting Actionable COVID-19 Dashboards: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal of 158 Public Web-Based COVID-19 Dashboards.具有可操作性的 COVID-19 仪表盘的特征:对 158 个公共网络 COVID-19 仪表盘的描述性评估和专家评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 24;23(2):e25682. doi: 10.2196/25682.
3
Empowering Global AMR Research Community: Interactive GIS dashboards for AMR data analysis and informed decision-making.赋能全球抗菌药物耐药性研究社区:用于抗菌药物耐药性数据分析和明智决策的交互式地理信息系统仪表板。
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;9:234. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21010.4. eCollection 2024.
4
Lessons Learned From Developing Dashboards to Support Decision-Making for Community Opioid Response by Community Stakeholders: Mixed Methods and Multisite Study.从社区利益相关者开发支持社区阿片类药物反应决策的仪表板中吸取的经验教训:混合方法和多站点研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 9;11:e51525. doi: 10.2196/51525.
5
Digital Health Dashboards for Decision-Making to Enable Rapid Responses During Public Health Crises: Replicable and Scalable Methodology.用于决策的数字健康仪表盘,以在公共卫生危机期间实现快速响应:可复制和可扩展的方法。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 30;12:e46810. doi: 10.2196/46810.
6
Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review.医疗保健环境中的仪表板:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 2;11(3):e34894. doi: 10.2196/34894.
7
A framework to integrate equity in public health emergency response dashboards: Dashboard instrument to review equity (DIRE).在突发公共卫生事件应对仪表板中纳入公平性的框架:审查公平性的仪表板工具(DIRE)
Public Health. 2025 Mar;240:182-194. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.053. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
8
Digital dashboards visualizing public health data: a systematic review.数字仪表盘可视化公共卫生数据:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:999958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.999958. eCollection 2023.
9
Dashboard Vision: Using Eye-Tracking to Understand and Predict Dashboard Viewing Behaviors.仪表盘视觉:利用眼动追踪技术理解和预测仪表盘观看行为。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Oct;31(10):6930-6945. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2025.3532497.
10
Exploring Changes to the Actionability of COVID-19 Dashboards Over the Course of 2020 in the Canadian Context: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal Study.探索2020年期间加拿大背景下新冠疫情仪表盘可操作性的变化:描述性评估与专家评估研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 6;23(8):e30200. doi: 10.2196/30200.

本文引用的文献

1
eHealth Literacy and Trust in Health Information Sources.电子健康素养与对健康信息来源的信任
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(6):616. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060616.
2
Are interactive and tailored data visualizations effective in promoting flu vaccination among the elderly? Evidence from a randomized experiment.交互式和定制的数据可视化在促进老年人接种流感疫苗方面是否有效?一项随机实验的证据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):317-328. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad087.
3
Digital dashboards visualizing public health data: a systematic review.
数字仪表盘可视化公共卫生数据:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:999958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.999958. eCollection 2023.
4
Real-Time Estimation and Monitoring of COVID-19 Aerosol Transmission Risk in Office Buildings.实时估计和监测办公楼内 COVID-19 气溶胶传播风险。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;23(5):2459. doi: 10.3390/s23052459.
5
Nailing the nuance on COVID-19.拿捏好 COVID-19 的细微差别。
Science. 2022 Jul 15;377(6603):243. doi: 10.1126/science.add8599. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
The changing epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 的流行病学变化。
Science. 2022 Mar 11;375(6585):1116-1121. doi: 10.1126/science.abm4915. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
7
Information Disclosure Contents of the COVID-19 Data Dashboard Websites for South Korea, China, and Japan: A Comparative Study.韩国、中国和日本新冠疫情数据仪表盘网站的信息披露内容:一项比较研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 1;9(11):1487. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111487.
8
Exploring Changes to the Actionability of COVID-19 Dashboards Over the Course of 2020 in the Canadian Context: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal Study.探索2020年期间加拿大背景下新冠疫情仪表盘可操作性的变化:描述性评估与专家评估研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 6;23(8):e30200. doi: 10.2196/30200.
9
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave.估算非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 首例疫情期间新增感染人数的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252827. eCollection 2021.
10
Communicating personalized risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study.传达COVID-19的个性化风险:一项实证研究的指导方针。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Apr 21;8(4):201721. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201721.