• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康素养与对健康信息来源的信任

eHealth Literacy and Trust in Health Information Sources.

作者信息

Alhewiti Abdullah

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(6):616. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060616.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13060616
PMID:40150466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11942269/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The spread of health-related information across the internet necessitates an evaluation of public eHealth literacy, trust in different health information sources, including healthcare providers, and how eHealth literacy is related to trust in different sources.

METHODS

407 individuals participated in a web-based survey in the Tabuk region of Saudi Arabia. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between eHealth literacy and demographic variables, and multiple linear regression was used to measure the relationship between eHealth literacy and trust in health information sources after adjustment for demographic factors.

RESULTS

The average eHealth literacy of the respondents was 27.17 out of 40. eHealth literacy levels were higher among females, younger age groups, those in the higher-education category, and those with a chronic disease or currently on medication. For 51.9% of participants, physicians and healthcare workers were their main source of health information, while 40% considered the internet their main source. None of the study participants perceived physicians and healthcare workers as untrustworthy, and social media was the least trusted source. eHealth literacy was not related to trust in physicians and health workers but was positively associated with trust in specialized health websites and negatively associated with trust in social media.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the public tends to prefer and trust physicians and other healthcare workers as a primary source of health information, regardless of their eHealth literacy levels. A higher eHealth literacy level was associated with trust in specialized health websites and distrust in social media.

摘要

引言

健康相关信息在互联网上的传播使得有必要对公众的电子健康素养、对包括医疗服务提供者在内的不同健康信息来源的信任度,以及电子健康素养与对不同来源的信任度之间的关系进行评估。

方法

407名个体参与了沙特阿拉伯塔布克地区的一项基于网络的调查。单因素分析用于评估电子健康素养与人口统计学变量之间的关系,多元线性回归用于在调整人口统计学因素后测量电子健康素养与对健康信息来源的信任度之间的关系。

结果

受访者的平均电子健康素养在40分制中为27.17分。女性、较年轻年龄组、高等教育类别者以及患有慢性病或目前正在服药者的电子健康素养水平较高。对于51.9%的参与者来说,医生和医护人员是他们主要的健康信息来源,而40%的人认为互联网是他们主要的信息来源。没有一名研究参与者认为医生和医护人员不值得信任,社交媒体是最不受信任的来源。电子健康素养与对医生和医护人员的信任无关,但与对专业健康网站的信任呈正相关,与对社交媒体的信任呈负相关。

结论

研究结果表明,无论电子健康素养水平如何,公众往往更喜欢并信任医生和其他医护人员作为主要的健康信息来源。较高的电子健康素养水平与对专业健康网站的信任以及对社交媒体的不信任有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7a/11942269/b7c42dd7a876/healthcare-13-00616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7a/11942269/e52b5c6bfead/healthcare-13-00616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7a/11942269/b7c42dd7a876/healthcare-13-00616-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7a/11942269/e52b5c6bfead/healthcare-13-00616-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7a/11942269/b7c42dd7a876/healthcare-13-00616-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
eHealth Literacy and Trust in Health Information Sources.电子健康素养与对健康信息来源的信任
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;13(6):616. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060616.
2
The Influence of eHealth Literacy on Perceived Trust in Online Health Communication Channels and Sources.电子健康素养对在线健康交流渠道和信息源的感知信任的影响。
J Health Commun. 2017 Jan;22(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults.婴儿潮一代和老年人的电子健康素养与Web 2.0健康信息搜索行为
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 17;17(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3992.
4
Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in the State of Kuwait: Survey of Internet Users From an Arab State.科威特国电子健康素养评估:对一个阿拉伯国家互联网用户的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 24;21(5):e11174. doi: 10.2196/11174.
5
E-health literacy and associated factors among chronic patients in a low-income country: a cross-sectional survey.电子健康素养与低收入国家慢性病患者的相关因素:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01202-1.
6
A survey on self-medication for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 and distrust in healthcare of veterans in a primary care setting in the United States.美国基层医疗环境中退伍军人预防或治疗新冠病毒病的自我药疗及对医疗保健不信任情况的调查
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Dec 15;13:20420986221143265. doi: 10.1177/20420986221143265. eCollection 2022.
7
Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Disease Knowledge, and Preventive Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Netizens.新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、疾病知识及预防行为:针对中国网民的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684. doi: 10.2196/19684.
8
eHealth Literacy and Web-Based Health Information-Seeking Behaviors on COVID-19 in Japan: Internet-Based Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养与日本 COVID-19 期间的网络健康信息搜索行为:基于互联网的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 11;26:e57842. doi: 10.2196/57842.
9
Trust and distrust toward online health information in nurse-patient communication and implications for eHealth literacy.医患沟通中对在线健康信息的信任和不信任及其对电子健康素养的影响。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Dec;16(4):412-420. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2279397. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
10
Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Patients Attending a Primary Care Clinic in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey.香港基层医疗诊所患者的在线健康信息搜索与电子健康素养:一项横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e10831. doi: 10.2196/10831.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking Digital Dashboards' Influence on Preventive Health Behavior Among Young Adults.剖析数字仪表盘对年轻人预防性健康行为的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 28;13(11):1279. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111279.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of e-Health Literacy on Risk Perception Among University Students.电子健康素养对大学生风险认知的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;13(3):265. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030265.
2
Factors influencing digital health literacy among older adults: a scoping review.影响老年人数字健康素养的因素:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 1;12:1447747. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447747. eCollection 2024.
3
e-Health literacy and online health information utilization among Jordanians: A population-based study.约旦人的电子健康素养与在线健康信息利用情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241288380. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288380. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Does Health Literacy Protect Against Cyberchondria: A Cross-Sectional Study?健康素养能否预防网络疑病症:一项横断面研究?
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Apr;30(4):e1089-e1100. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0425. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews.电子健康对初级保健中关系和信任的影响:综述研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 3;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02176-5.
6
Determinants and outcomes of eHealth literacy in healthy adults: A systematic review.健康成年人电子健康素养的决定因素和结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291229. eCollection 2023.
7
Cyberchondria and its Association with Smartphone Addiction and Electronic Health Literacy among a Saudi Population.沙特人群中的网络疑病症及其与智能手机成瘾和电子健康素养的关联。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;11(2):162-168. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_491_22. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
8
e-Health Literacy Scale, Patient Attitudes, Medication Adherence, and Internal Locus of Control.电子健康素养量表、患者态度、药物依从性和内部控制点。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Apr;7(2):e80-e88. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230417-01. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
The Relation Between eHealth Literacy and Health-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康素养与健康相关行为的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 30;25:e40778. doi: 10.2196/40778.
10
Assessing eHealth literacy among internet users in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study.评估黎巴嫩互联网用户的电子健康素养:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 9;8:20552076221119336. doi: 10.1177/20552076221119336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.