• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Communication During Brain Death Conversations: Dead With a Heartbeat.脑死亡谈话期间医生沟通的定性分析:有心跳的死亡
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;15(4):e200484. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200484. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric and Adult Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Consensus Guideline.儿科和成人脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡的共识指南。
Neurology. 2023 Dec 12;101(24):1112-1132. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207740. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Beyond the NURSE Acronym: The Functions of Empathy in Serious Illness Conversations.超越“护士”首字母缩写词:同理心在重病谈话中的作用
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Apr;65(4):e375-e379. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.029. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Brain death communication with parents of children and adolescents: care strategies.与儿童和青少年父母进行脑死亡告知:护理策略
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Sep 23;75(3):e20210943. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0943. eCollection 2022.
4
Brain Death Determination and Communication: An Innovative Approach Using Simulation and Standardized Patients.脑死亡判定与沟通:运用模拟与标准化患者的创新方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e765-e772. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Simulation-Based Training Improves Fellows' Competence in Brain Death Discussion and Declaration.基于模拟的培训可提高住院医师在脑死亡讨论和宣告方面的能力。
Neurologist. 2021 Nov 26;27(1):6-10. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000354.
6
Pediatric Death by Neurologic Criteria: The Ever-Changing Landscape and the Expanding Role of Palliative Care Professionals.儿科神经病学标准死亡:不断变化的格局和姑息治疗专业人员作用的扩大。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Nov;62(5):1079-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: The World Brain Death Project.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡:世界脑死亡项目。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1078-1097. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11586.
8
Introduction: Through the Lens of Linguistic Theory.引言:透过语言理论的视角
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jul;28(3):392-393. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000288.
9
Response to Commentaries: When "Everyday Language" Contributes to Miscommunication in Serious Illness.对评论的回应:当“日常语言”导致重病中的沟通不畅时。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jul;28(3):433-438. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000355.
10
Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests: AAN position statement.脑死亡、脑死亡的判定以及脑死亡收容请求的成员指南:美国神经病学学会立场声明
Neurology. 2019 Jan 28;92(5):228-232. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006750.

脑死亡谈话期间医生沟通的定性分析:有心跳的死亡

A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Communication During Brain Death Conversations: Dead With a Heartbeat.

作者信息

Rao Anoushka, Shen Jason X, Fisher Paul Graham, Magnus David

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; and.

Department of Pediatric Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;15(4):e200484. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200484. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200484
PMID:40510874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12153502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In recent decades, many legal cases have resulted from physicians ineffectively communicating to a family that their loved one is brain dead (brain dead/death by neurologic criteria [BD/DNC]). Although the definition of BD/DNC has recently undergone revision, little research has been conducted to establish optimal approaches in communicating BD/DNC status to families. The aim of this study was to characterize what highly experienced physicians perceive to be the best communication practices and language choices during BD/DNC conversations.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with physician leaders in the field of BD/DNC between September 2023 and January 2024. All interviews were conducted through Zoom. Twenty expert physician participants were recruited from multiple institutions across the United States through convenience sampling. Participants were current or former attending physicians whose practices at academic institutions involved communication with families about BD/DNC in either the pediatric or adult setting. Participants completed a Qualtrics form containing questions about their demographic background and practice characteristics, including an estimate of the number of times they communicated BD/DNC to patient families. Semistructured interviews were conducted with each of the participants and included hypothetical scenarios and views about best practices.

RESULTS

Using 20 qualitative interview transcripts, we identified multiple areas of agreement and disagreement among expert physicians regarding best practices in communicating BD/DNC status. While physicians concurred on specific language to use and avoid, they differed on whether to use the word "coma," on when to introduce the possibility of brain death, and on whether to analogize with cardiac death. There was strong agreement on the utility of visualization through imaging and family attendance at BD/DNC testing. Finally, physicians were in consensus that multiple family meetings with the same providers are crucial for successful BD/DNC communication.

DISCUSSION

This study described main convergences and divergences in physician language during BD/DNC conversations and used qualitative data to present a "train journey" theory of ideal physician communication with families. By investigating and improving physician communication styles during BD/DNC conversations, the medical community may ameliorate the legal and medical fallout that results from clinical miscommunication.

摘要

背景与目的

近几十年来,许多法律案件源于医生未能有效地告知家属其亲人已脑死亡(脑死亡/基于神经学标准的死亡[BD/DNC])。尽管BD/DNC的定义最近有所修订,但很少有研究来确定向家属传达BD/DNC状态的最佳方法。本研究的目的是描述经验丰富的医生认为在BD/DNC谈话中最佳的沟通方式和语言选择。

方法

在这项定性研究中,我们于2023年9月至2024年1月期间对BD/DNC领域的医生领导者进行了半结构化的深入访谈。所有访谈均通过Zoom进行。通过便利抽样从美国多个机构招募了20名专家医生参与者。参与者为现任或前任主治医生,他们在学术机构的工作涉及在儿科或成人环境中与家属就BD/DNC进行沟通。参与者填写了一份Qualtrics表格,其中包含有关其人口统计学背景和执业特征的问题,包括他们向患者家属传达BD/DNC的次数估计。对每位参与者进行了半结构化访谈,包括假设情景和关于最佳实践的观点。

结果

通过20份定性访谈记录,我们确定了专家医生在传达BD/DNC状态的最佳实践方面的多个共识和分歧领域。虽然医生们就使用和避免使用的特定语言达成了一致,但在是否使用“昏迷”一词、何时引入脑死亡的可能性以及是否与心源性死亡进行类比方面存在分歧。在通过成像进行可视化以及家属参与BD/DNC检测的效用方面存在强烈共识。最后,医生们一致认为,由相同的医疗人员与家属多次开会对于成功传达BD/DNC至关重要。

讨论

本研究描述了BD/DNC谈话中医生语言的主要趋同和分歧,并使用定性数据提出了理想的医生与家属沟通的“火车旅程”理论。通过调查和改善BD/DNC谈话期间医生的沟通方式,医学界可以减轻临床沟通失误导致的法律和医疗后果。