Rao Anoushka, Shen Jason X, Fisher Paul Graham, Magnus David
Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; and.
Department of Pediatric Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;15(4):e200484. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200484. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
In recent decades, many legal cases have resulted from physicians ineffectively communicating to a family that their loved one is brain dead (brain dead/death by neurologic criteria [BD/DNC]). Although the definition of BD/DNC has recently undergone revision, little research has been conducted to establish optimal approaches in communicating BD/DNC status to families. The aim of this study was to characterize what highly experienced physicians perceive to be the best communication practices and language choices during BD/DNC conversations.
In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with physician leaders in the field of BD/DNC between September 2023 and January 2024. All interviews were conducted through Zoom. Twenty expert physician participants were recruited from multiple institutions across the United States through convenience sampling. Participants were current or former attending physicians whose practices at academic institutions involved communication with families about BD/DNC in either the pediatric or adult setting. Participants completed a Qualtrics form containing questions about their demographic background and practice characteristics, including an estimate of the number of times they communicated BD/DNC to patient families. Semistructured interviews were conducted with each of the participants and included hypothetical scenarios and views about best practices.
Using 20 qualitative interview transcripts, we identified multiple areas of agreement and disagreement among expert physicians regarding best practices in communicating BD/DNC status. While physicians concurred on specific language to use and avoid, they differed on whether to use the word "coma," on when to introduce the possibility of brain death, and on whether to analogize with cardiac death. There was strong agreement on the utility of visualization through imaging and family attendance at BD/DNC testing. Finally, physicians were in consensus that multiple family meetings with the same providers are crucial for successful BD/DNC communication.
This study described main convergences and divergences in physician language during BD/DNC conversations and used qualitative data to present a "train journey" theory of ideal physician communication with families. By investigating and improving physician communication styles during BD/DNC conversations, the medical community may ameliorate the legal and medical fallout that results from clinical miscommunication.
近几十年来,许多法律案件源于医生未能有效地告知家属其亲人已脑死亡(脑死亡/基于神经学标准的死亡[BD/DNC])。尽管BD/DNC的定义最近有所修订,但很少有研究来确定向家属传达BD/DNC状态的最佳方法。本研究的目的是描述经验丰富的医生认为在BD/DNC谈话中最佳的沟通方式和语言选择。
在这项定性研究中,我们于2023年9月至2024年1月期间对BD/DNC领域的医生领导者进行了半结构化的深入访谈。所有访谈均通过Zoom进行。通过便利抽样从美国多个机构招募了20名专家医生参与者。参与者为现任或前任主治医生,他们在学术机构的工作涉及在儿科或成人环境中与家属就BD/DNC进行沟通。参与者填写了一份Qualtrics表格,其中包含有关其人口统计学背景和执业特征的问题,包括他们向患者家属传达BD/DNC的次数估计。对每位参与者进行了半结构化访谈,包括假设情景和关于最佳实践的观点。
通过20份定性访谈记录,我们确定了专家医生在传达BD/DNC状态的最佳实践方面的多个共识和分歧领域。虽然医生们就使用和避免使用的特定语言达成了一致,但在是否使用“昏迷”一词、何时引入脑死亡的可能性以及是否与心源性死亡进行类比方面存在分歧。在通过成像进行可视化以及家属参与BD/DNC检测的效用方面存在强烈共识。最后,医生们一致认为,由相同的医疗人员与家属多次开会对于成功传达BD/DNC至关重要。
本研究描述了BD/DNC谈话中医生语言的主要趋同和分歧,并使用定性数据提出了理想的医生与家属沟通的“火车旅程”理论。通过调查和改善BD/DNC谈话期间医生的沟通方式,医学界可以减轻临床沟通失误导致的法律和医疗后果。