Elrashid Afra, Almarjan Munira, Alwasem Hala, Sharakh Magdolin Abo, Al Amer Heba
Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S814-S818. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1985_24. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
This trial aimed to comparatively evaluate Icon® resin infiltration, micro-abrasion, and varnish in restoring aesthetics of white spot lesions (WSLs) post-orthodontic treatment.
27 WSLs were detected in 27 teeth of 3 patients. The participants were analyzed-before intervention (T0), immediately after intervention (T1), 2 weeks later (T2), and after the application of the three techniques; Icon® resin infiltration, Opalustre™ micro-abrasion, and ClinproTM XT varnish. Block randomization was done. A visual analog scale and Photoshop CS3 were used to assess the color of WSLs and the adjacent enamel, while ICDAS was used to assess the classification of the enamel loss level.
At baseline T2, There was a high significant difference between the three used test with both examiner l and ll. It showed that the Resin infiltration has done better than Micro-abrasion and Fluoride varnish.
When compared to teeth treated with micro-abrasion, resin infiltration has demonstrated the best instant cosmetic outcomes. But according to both examiners, the fluoride varnish changed the least.
本试验旨在比较评估Icon®树脂渗透、微磨除和涂氟在正畸治疗后恢复白斑病变(WSLs)美观方面的效果。
在3名患者的27颗牙齿中检测到27处WSLs。在干预前(T0)、干预后即刻(T1)、2周后(T2)以及应用三种技术(Icon®树脂渗透、Opalustre™微磨除和ClinproTM XT涂氟)后对参与者进行分析。采用区组随机化。使用视觉模拟量表和Photoshop CS3评估WSLs及相邻牙釉质的颜色,同时使用国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)评估牙釉质丧失程度的分类。
在基线T2时,两位检查者对三种使用的测试方法均发现有高度显著差异。结果表明,树脂渗透的效果优于微磨除和氟化物涂氟。
与微磨除治疗的牙齿相比,树脂渗透显示出最佳的即时美容效果。但根据两位检查者的评估,氟化物涂氟的变化最小。