Feng Yaxu, Bergeron Brian E, Zhang Shijin, Sun Danyang, Fisher Kole, Tay Franklin R, Fan Bing
The State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105909. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105909. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
This study evaluated the effect of apical negative pressure sealer infiltration on void percentage, void types, porosity size distribution, and coronal microleakage in root canal fillings using different hydraulic calcium silicate sealers with the single-cone technique.
Forty-eight extracted premolars with long oval-shaped canals were selected and divided into four groups based on the filling technique and sealer (n = 12): apical negative pressure-assisted NeoSEALER Flo (NPNF), apical negative pressure-assisted iRoot SP (NPS), syringe-assisted NeoSEALER Flo (SNF), and syringe-assisted iRoot SP (SS), all using the single-cone technique. Micro-computed tomography (10 µm resolution) was used to scan the obturated canals. Void percentages, types, and porosity size distribution were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
None of the techniques yielded void-free obturations. However, the NPNF (0.75 %, interquartile range 0.93 %) and NPS (0.42 %, IQR 0.68 %) groups showed significantly lower overall void percentages than the SNF (13.27 %, IQR 9.24 %) and SS (15.39 %, IQR 13.87 %) groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was identified between the NPNF and NPS groups, or between the SNF and SS groups. Apical negative pressure groups also demonstrated significantly fewer open voids and large porosities and reduced microleakage compared to the syringe-assisted groups (p < 0.05).
Apical negative pressure sealer infiltration combined with the single-cone technique significantly improved filling quality and reduced coronal microleakage in long oval-shaped root canals compared to the conventional syringe-assisted single-cone technique.
The use of apical negative pressure for introducing hydraulic calcium silicate sealers during single-cone obturation improves the quality of root canal fillings by reducing the percentage of voids and the presence of large porosities.
本研究评估了在使用单锥技术的情况下,根尖负压封闭剂浸润对不同水硬性硅酸钙封闭剂根管充填中孔隙率、孔隙类型、孔隙大小分布及冠部微渗漏的影响。
选取48颗具有长椭圆形根管的拔除前磨牙,根据充填技术和封闭剂分为四组(每组n = 12):根尖负压辅助的NeoSEALER Flo(NPNF)组、根尖负压辅助的iRoot SP(NPS)组、注射器辅助的NeoSEALER Flo(SNF)组和注射器辅助的iRoot SP(SS)组,均采用单锥技术。使用微计算机断层扫描(分辨率为10 µm)扫描充填后的根管。分析孔隙率、孔隙类型及孔隙大小分布。设定统计学显著性水平为α = 0.05。
所有技术均未产生无孔隙的充填。然而,NPNF组(0.75%,四分位数间距0.93%)和NPS组(0.42%,四分位数间距0.68%)的总体孔隙率显著低于SNF组(13.27%,四分位数间距9.24%)和SS组(15.39%,四分位数间距13.87%)(p < 0.05)。NPNF组和NPS组之间,以及SNF组和SS组之间未发现显著差异。与注射器辅助组相比,根尖负压组的开放孔隙和大孔隙也显著减少,微渗漏降低(p < 0.05)。
与传统的注射器辅助单锥技术相比,根尖负压封闭剂浸润结合单锥技术显著提高了长椭圆形根管的充填质量并减少了冠部微渗漏。
在单锥充填过程中使用根尖负压引入水硬性硅酸钙封闭剂,通过降低孔隙率和大孔隙的存在来提高根管充填质量。