• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于DHIS2的斯里兰卡环境、职业健康与食品安全电子信息管理系统的可用性评估

Usability evaluation of a DHIS2-based electronic information management system for environmental, occupational health and food safety in Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Godage Prabhadini, Dhanapala Sapumal, Jayatilleke Achala

机构信息

Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka

Country Office, World Health Organization, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jun 13;32(1):e101357. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101357.

DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101357
PMID:40514210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12164650/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Public Health Inspector (PHI) Monthly Report is a critical document that provides insights into environmental, occupational health and food safety aspects within each Medical Officer of Health area in Sri Lanka. Currently, PHIs use a paper format to track these key health indicators, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate national data. This study evaluates the usability of a DHIS2 (District Health Information Software 2) based digital solution to improve PHI reporting.

METHODS

The DHIS2 system was customised to address the gaps in the current reporting process, and its usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) with 50 stakeholders who tested the system.

RESULTS

The DHIS2 platform was flexible enough to be customised to meet the requirements of the new electronic Environmental, Occupational Health and Food Safety Information Management System (eEOHFSIMS). The system achieved an average SUS score of 72.25, exceeding the accepted benchmark of 68, with a high SD of 13.37. However, a 92% knowledge gap remained.

DISCUSSION

Digitising the PHI monthly report using DHIS2 addresses the challenges of traditional paper-based reporting, enabling timely monitoring of public health indicators. The favourable SUS score confirms the system's high usability, yet the knowledge gap underscores the need for ongoing user training to ensure data quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The eEOHFSIMS demonstrated its capacity to deliver accurate, complete and timely data, greatly benefiting Sri Lanka's primary healthcare services. This system enhancement supports better-informed decision-making, aligns with national health policies and enables continuous monitoring and evaluation of public health services.

摘要

目标

公共卫生检查员(PHI)月度报告是一份关键文件,可深入了解斯里兰卡每个卫生官员辖区内的环境、职业健康和食品安全方面的情况。目前,公共卫生检查员使用纸质表格来跟踪这些关键健康指标,导致国家数据不完整且不准确。本研究评估了基于DHIS2(地区卫生信息软件2)的数字解决方案在改善公共卫生检查员报告方面的可用性。

方法

对DHIS2系统进行定制,以弥补当前报告流程中的差距,并使用系统可用性量表(SUS)对50名测试该系统的利益相关者进行评估,以评估其可用性。

结果

DHIS2平台足够灵活,可进行定制以满足新的电子环境、职业健康和食品安全信息管理系统(eEOHFSIMS)的要求。该系统的平均SUS得分为72.25,超过了68的可接受基准,标准差为13.37。然而,仍存在92%的知识差距。

讨论

使用DHIS2将公共卫生检查员月度报告数字化,解决了传统纸质报告的挑战,能够及时监测公共卫生指标。良好的SUS得分证实了该系统的高可用性,但知识差距凸显了持续进行用户培训以确保数据质量的必要性。

结论

eEOHFSIMS展示了其提供准确、完整和及时数据的能力,极大地惠及了斯里兰卡的初级医疗服务。这一系统改进支持了更明智的决策制定,符合国家卫生政策,并能够对公共卫生服务进行持续监测和评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/09ca61ed4b0f/bmjhci-32-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/16aaac9c2f7c/bmjhci-32-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/65360d0568f2/bmjhci-32-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/09ca61ed4b0f/bmjhci-32-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/16aaac9c2f7c/bmjhci-32-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/65360d0568f2/bmjhci-32-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f622/12164650/09ca61ed4b0f/bmjhci-32-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Usability evaluation of a DHIS2-based electronic information management system for environmental, occupational health and food safety in Sri Lanka.基于DHIS2的斯里兰卡环境、职业健康与食品安全电子信息管理系统的可用性评估
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jun 13;32(1):e101357. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101357.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Evaluating Sri Lanka's malaria re-establishment prevention using IHR and JEE frameworks.使用《国际卫生条例》和《联合评估框架》评估斯里兰卡预防疟疾重新流行的情况。
Malar J. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05456-w.
4
Contributions of District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) to maternal and child health service performance in Ethiopia: an interrupted time series mixed-methods study.地区卫生信息软件2(DHIS2)对埃塞俄比亚母婴健康服务绩效的贡献:一项中断时间序列混合方法研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;83(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01641-0.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
A NoSQL document based eCRF system for study of vaccines with variable adverse events case study on COVID19 vaccines.一种用于研究具有可变不良事件的疫苗的基于NoSQL文档的电子病例报告表系统——以COVID-19疫苗为例的案例研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05746-y.
7
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Unveiling the role of DHIS2 in enhancing data quality and accessibility in primary healthcare facilities: Evidence from Ethiopia.揭示DHIS2在提高初级卫生保健机构数据质量和可及性方面的作用:来自埃塞俄比亚的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0314505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314505. eCollection 2024.
2
Leveraging digital health initiatives to enhance the effectiveness, equity and responsiveness of health systems.利用数字健康举措提高卫生系统的有效性、公平性和响应能力。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Aug 3;9(8):e014626. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014626.
3
Health professionals' experience on District Health Information System (DHIS2) and its utilization at local levels in Gandaki province, Nepal: A qualitative study.
尼泊尔甘达基省卫生专业人员对地区卫生信息系统(DHIS2)的经验及其在地方层面的应用:一项定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;4(3):e0002890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002890. eCollection 2024.
4
What Data Should Be Included in a Modern Public Health Data System.现代公共卫生数据系统应包含哪些数据
Big Data. 2022 Sep;10(S1):S9-S14. doi: 10.1089/big.2022.0205.
5
System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis.系统可用性量表在数字健康应用程序中的基准测试:荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e37290. doi: 10.2196/37290.
6
Open-source electronic health record systems: A systematic review of most recent advances.开源电子健康记录系统:最新进展的系统评价。
Health Informatics J. 2022 Apr-Jun;28(2):14604582221099828. doi: 10.1177/14604582221099828.
7
Perceptions and experiences with district health information system software to collect and utilize health data in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploratory study.孟加拉国利用地区卫生信息系统软件收集和利用卫生数据的认知和经验:一项定性探索性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 26;20(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05322-2.
8
End-user participation in health information systems (HIS) development: Physicians' and nurses' experiences.终端用户参与健康信息系统 (HIS) 开发:医生和护士的经验。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 May;137:104117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104117. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Identification of the essential components of quality in the data collection process for public health information systems.公共卫生信息系统数据收集过程质量要素的确定。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):664-682. doi: 10.1177/1460458219848622. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
A review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems.公共卫生信息系统数据质量评估方法综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 14;11(5):5170-207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505170.