Zamora-Marín José M, Zamora-López Antonio, León-Ortega Mario, Sáez-Gómez Pedro, García-Castellanos Francisco A, Sánchez-Zapata José A, Camacho Carlos
Department of Applied Biology, Centro de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria (CIAGRO-UMH), Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Alicante, Spain.
ANSE Bird Ringing Group, Naturalist Association of Southeastern Spain (ANSE), Murcia, Spain.
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jun;35(4):e70059. doi: 10.1002/eap.70059.
Over the past decades, intensive agriculture has expanded worldwide in response to the rising human demand for food. Intensive farming practices commonly involve the application of pesticides and other agrochemical compounds, contributing to the global decline in farmland bird populations, particularly aerial insectivores. Moreover, the increased mechanization of agricultural operations (e.g., grass cutting, tree pruning, and brush chipping) may destroy nests and reduce the breeding success of ground-nesting bird species. Here, we used a ground-nesting insectivorous bird, the Red-necked Nightjar (Caprimulgus ruficollis), as a model to test for the effects of organic vs. intensive farming practices on breeding performance. We used data from 191 nightjar nests monitored over a 4-year period in a highly cultivated landscape of SE Spain. Four breeding parameters (clutch size, hatching success, fledging success, and overall breeding success) were compared between two adjacent farms under organic and conventional intensive management. Additionally, we compared four population-level attributes (breeding phenology, breeding density, age structure of breeders, and foraging range size) considered to be important determinants of breeding performance. Nightjars breeding in the organic and in the intensive farms had a moderate breeding performance comparable to that reported in other, more extensive agricultural landscapes (e.g., vineyards). All breeding parameters and two out of the four measured population-level attributes were statistically not different between the organic and the intensive farm. However, nest aggregation was higher in the organic farm, and space use analyses revealed that GPS-tracked nightjars nesting within the intensive farm traveled to foraging areas outside the farm more often than those from the organic farm. This suggests that plasticity in foraging behavior (e.g., the use of alternative foraging sites) may buffer the potential negative effects of intensive farming practices (e.g., decreased prey availability) on the breeding performance of nightjars. Our study underlines the potential role of landscape complementation and ecological plasticity in space-use behaviors as determinants of breeding performance in farmland birds, enabling these species to (partly) compensate for the impacts of intensive agriculture.
在过去几十年里,集约化农业在全球范围内不断扩张,以应对人类对食物日益增长的需求。集约化养殖方式通常涉及农药和其他农用化合物的使用,这导致了全球农田鸟类数量的下降,尤其是食虫鸟类。此外,农业作业机械化程度的提高(如割草、修剪树木和碎枝)可能会破坏鸟巢,降低地栖鸟类的繁殖成功率。在此,我们以一种地栖食虫鸟类——红颈夜鹰(Caprimulgus ruficollis)为模型,来测试有机农业与集约化农业对繁殖性能的影响。我们使用了在西班牙东南部高度耕种地区4年期间监测的191个夜鹰巢穴的数据。比较了两个相邻农场(一个采用有机管理,另一个采用传统集约化管理)的四个繁殖参数(窝卵数、孵化成功率、 fledging成功率和总体繁殖成功率)。此外,我们还比较了四个种群水平属性(繁殖物候、繁殖密度、繁殖者年龄结构和觅食范围大小),这些属性被认为是繁殖性能的重要决定因素。在有机农场和集约化农场繁殖的夜鹰具有中等的繁殖性能,与其他更广泛的农业景观(如葡萄园)中报道的情况相当。所有繁殖参数以及四个测量的种群水平属性中的两个在有机农场和集约化农场之间在统计学上没有差异。然而,有机农场的巢穴聚集度更高,空间利用分析表明,在集约化农场筑巢的夜鹰通过GPS追踪发现,它们比来自有机农场的夜鹰更频繁地前往农场外的觅食区。这表明觅食行为的可塑性(如使用替代觅食地点)可能缓冲集约化养殖方式(如猎物可用性降低)对夜鹰繁殖性能的潜在负面影响。我们的研究强调了景观互补性和空间利用行为中的生态可塑性作为农田鸟类繁殖性能决定因素的潜在作用,使这些物种能够(部分)补偿集约化农业的影响。