Suppr超能文献

护理教育中的人工智能与学术诚信:一项关于使用情况、认知及机构影响的混合方法研究。

Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in nursing education: A mixed methods study on usage, perceptions, and institutional implications.

作者信息

Zgambo Maggie, Costello Martina, Buhlmann Melanie, Maldon Justine, Anyango Edah, Adama Esther

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, Perth, Western Australia 6027, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup Campus, Perth, Western Australia 6027, Australia.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Oct;153:106796. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106796. Epub 2025 Jun 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education has generated substantial debate among academics and students, given the potential for students to engage in academic misconduct through the misuse of AI. Academics argue that AI poses a serious threat to the foundational development of nurses through the questionable integrity of AI-generated academic work and by undermining the development of critical thinking skills essential for professional practice. However, there is limited research on nursing students' integration of AI technologies in their studies.

METHOD

This study utilised a convergent parallel mixed methods approach to develop a multiphase approach with convergent parallel techniques for the qualitative and quantitative phases. The quantitative method utilised a Qualtrics-powered online survey to engage 188 nursing students, exploring various domains related to AI use. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews with 13 purposively sampled students provided deeper insights. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach, while the quantitative data were analysed using SPSS.

RESULT

In the survey, 24 % of respondents reported using AI, ranging from moderate to extensive usage. In logistics regression analysis, hearing about AI (OR = 3.9; CI 1.07-10.2; p < 0.05), the belief that AI was useful in the studies (OR = 5.5; CI 1.7-17.3; p < 0.01), and the perception that learning to use AI is easy (OR = 3.4; CI 1.1-11.1; p < 0.05) predicted AI use. Qualitative findings revealed that all students used AI for various academic purposes. The 'fascinating', 'intelligent' and 'efficient' nature of AI in handling 'time-consuming' academic tasks motivated its use. However, concerns about breaching academic integrity and the value of achieving success through personal effort served as deterrents.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that while AI's efficiency drives students to adopt it, they remain cautious about its ethical implications, leading to uncertainty in its application within academic practices. This highlights the critical need for institutional support and explicit guidelines on responsible AI integration in educational settings.

摘要

背景

鉴于学生可能通过滥用人工智能而参与学术不端行为,人工智能在高等教育中的应用兴起在学者和学生中引发了大量争论。学者们认为,人工智能生成的学术作品的诚信存疑,且破坏了专业实践所需的批判性思维技能的发展,这对护士的基础发展构成了严重威胁。然而,关于护理专业学生在学习中整合人工智能技术的研究有限。

方法

本研究采用了收敛平行混合方法,为定性和定量阶段开发了一种采用收敛平行技术的多阶段方法。定量方法利用由Qualtrics驱动的在线调查,让188名护理专业学生参与,探索与人工智能使用相关的各个领域。在定性阶段,对13名有目的抽样的学生进行深入访谈,以提供更深入的见解。定性数据采用归纳主题分析法进行分析,定量数据则使用SPSS进行分析。

结果

在调查中,24%的受访者报告使用过人工智能,使用程度从中度到广泛不等。在逻辑回归分析中,听说过人工智能(OR = 3.9;CI 1.07 - 10.2;p < 0.05)、认为人工智能在学习中有用(OR = 5.5;CI 1.7 - 17.3;p < 0.01)以及觉得学习使用人工智能很容易(OR = 3.4;CI 1.1 - 11.1;p < 0.05)可预测人工智能的使用情况。定性研究结果显示,所有学生都将人工智能用于各种学术目的。人工智能在处理“耗时”学术任务方面“迷人”“智能”且“高效”的特性促使他们使用。然而,对违反学术诚信的担忧以及通过个人努力取得成功的价值观念起到了威慑作用。

结论

研究结果表明,虽然人工智能的效率促使学生采用它,但他们仍对其伦理影响持谨慎态度,导致其在学术实践中的应用存在不确定性。这凸显了在教育环境中机构支持以及关于负责任地整合人工智能的明确指导方针的迫切需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验