Martínez-Palacios Karol, Rubiano Andrés M, Demetriades Andreas K, Vásquez-García Sebastián
Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
MEDITECH Foundation, Cali, Colombia.
Brain Spine. 2025 May 17;5:104281. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104281. eCollection 2025.
Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome (TCCS) presents complex challenges in the management of spinal cord injury. Characterized by disproportionate upper limb weakness, TCCS is the most common clinical spinal cord syndrome, typically affecting males in a bimodal age distribution. Mechanisms include hyperextension injuries in older adults with degenerative cervical spine disease and high-energy trauma in younger individuals. Diagnosis is based on neurological assessment, with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale used for severity classification. Management strategies, including surgical and medical approaches, may influence functional outcomes, although high-quality comparative evidence is limited. Surgical decompression and stabilization are often pursued to relieve mechanical compression, while nonoperative strategies may be considered in selected cases with less severe neurological deficits. The timing of surgical intervention remains a subject of ongoing debate and must be individualized. Neurocritical care considerations are increasingly recognized as potentially important in the early phase of TCCS. Experimental and clinical investigations into intraspinal pressure (ISP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and spinal perfusion pressure (SPP) monitoring suggest these parameters may aid in minimizing secondary injury, though their routine clinical use is not yet established. Complications such as venous thromboembolism, infection, pressure injuries, and autonomic dysfunction are common and require comprehensive management. The role of corticosteroids remains controversial. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on TCCS, with emphasis on diagnostic, surgical, and neurocritical care considerations. As the field advances, further evidence is needed to clarify optimal management pathways and improve outcomes in this challenging clinical entity.
创伤性中央脊髓综合征(TCCS)在脊髓损伤的管理中面临着复杂的挑战。TCCS的特征是上肢无力程度不成比例,它是最常见的临床脊髓综合征,通常在双峰年龄分布中影响男性。其机制包括患有退行性颈椎疾病的老年人的过伸性损伤以及年轻人的高能创伤。诊断基于神经学评估,美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表用于严重程度分类。管理策略,包括手术和药物治疗方法,可能会影响功能结局,尽管高质量的比较证据有限。通常进行手术减压和稳定化以缓解机械压迫,而对于神经功能缺损较轻的特定病例,可以考虑非手术策略。手术干预的时机仍然是一个持续争论的话题,必须个体化。在TCCS的早期阶段,神经重症监护方面的考虑越来越被认为具有潜在的重要性。对脊髓内压力(ISP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和脊髓灌注压(SPP)监测的实验和临床研究表明,这些参数可能有助于将继发性损伤降至最低,尽管它们在常规临床中的应用尚未确立。静脉血栓栓塞、感染、压疮和自主神经功能障碍等并发症很常见,需要综合管理。皮质类固醇的作用仍然存在争议。这篇叙述性综述综合了关于TCCS的当前知识,重点是诊断、手术和神经重症监护方面的考虑。随着该领域的发展,需要进一步的证据来阐明最佳管理途径并改善这个具有挑战性的临床实体的治疗效果。