• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类在公共场所与配送无人机的互动:来自接收者和旁观者视角的设计建议。

Human interactions with delivery drones in public spaces: design recommendations from recipient and bystander perspectives.

作者信息

Lingam Shiva Nischal, Verstegen Rutger, Petermeijer Sebastiaan M, Martens Marieke

机构信息

Aerospace Operations Safety and Human Performance, Royal Netherlands Aerospace Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2025 May 30;12:1580289. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1580289. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2025.1580289
PMID:40519972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12162322/
Abstract

Drones will likely deliver packages in public spaces, where humans interact as recipients of the package and as bystanders passing by. Understanding the human needs and uncertainties that may arise during these interactions is crucial to ensure safety. This user-centered design study employed twelve interviews and four focus groups to identify key requirements for recipients and bystanders interacting with delivery drones in public spaces. Findings demonstrate different information needs and preferred interface modalities between recipients and bystanders across various interaction stages, from ordering a package to the drone's retraction after delivery. This paper highlights essential design features and offers concrete design recommendations based on the interaction requirements. These recommendations can inform the standardization and customization of design features for each interaction stage, enhancing safety and facilitating natural human-drone interaction. Future research should build on these recommendations and validate the design concepts through experimental user studies involving human interactions with delivery drones in public spaces.

摘要

无人机很可能会在公共场所投递包裹,在这些场所,人们既是包裹的接收者,也是路过的旁观者。了解这些互动过程中可能出现的人类需求和不确定性对于确保安全至关重要。这项以用户为中心的设计研究采用了12次访谈和4个焦点小组,以确定在公共场所与送货无人机互动的接收者和旁观者的关键需求。研究结果表明,从订购包裹到无人机投递后撤离的各个互动阶段,接收者和旁观者之间存在不同的信息需求和偏好的界面模式。本文强调了基本的设计特征,并根据互动需求提供了具体的设计建议。这些建议可为每个互动阶段的设计特征标准化和定制提供参考,提高安全性并促进自然的人机交互。未来的研究应基于这些建议,并通过涉及在公共场所人与送货无人机互动的实验性用户研究来验证设计概念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/04a3c4bc82c1/frobt-12-1580289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/7736f269de6e/frobt-12-1580289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/345d94897ec3/frobt-12-1580289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/8d661becef5a/frobt-12-1580289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/cd8e3dad5b52/frobt-12-1580289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/7b1b3fa711ff/frobt-12-1580289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/04a3c4bc82c1/frobt-12-1580289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/7736f269de6e/frobt-12-1580289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/345d94897ec3/frobt-12-1580289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/8d661becef5a/frobt-12-1580289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/cd8e3dad5b52/frobt-12-1580289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/7b1b3fa711ff/frobt-12-1580289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ee/12162322/04a3c4bc82c1/frobt-12-1580289-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Human interactions with delivery drones in public spaces: design recommendations from recipient and bystander perspectives.人类在公共场所与配送无人机的互动:来自接收者和旁观者视角的设计建议。
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 30;12:1580289. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1580289. eCollection 2025.
2
Delivery of Automated External Defibrillators via Drones in Simulated Cardiac Arrest: Users' Experiences and the Human-Drone Interaction.通过无人机在模拟心脏骤停中递送自动体外除颤器:用户体验与人机交互
Resuscitation. 2020 Dec;157:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
"Drones are a great idea! What is an AED?" novel insights from a qualitative study on public perception of using drones to deliver automatic external defibrillators.“无人机是个很棒的主意!什么是自动体外除颤器?”——关于公众对使用无人机运送自动体外除颤器认知的定性研究的新见解
Resusc Plus. 2020 Oct 16;4:100033. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100033. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Bystander interaction with a novel multipurpose medical drone: A simulation trial.旁观者与新型多功能医疗无人机的互动:一项模拟试验。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Apr 16;18:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100633. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Drone delivery of an automated external defibrillator - a mixed method simulation study of bystander experience.无人机配送自动体外除颤器-旁观者体验的混合方法模拟研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 8;27(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0622-6.
6
Sensing spectrum sharing based massive MIMO radar for drone tracking and interception.基于感知频谱共享的大规模 MIMO 雷达用于无人机跟踪和拦截。
PLoS One. 2022 May 20;17(5):e0268834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268834. eCollection 2022.
7
Handover Management for Drones in Future Mobile Networks-A Survey.未来移动网络中无人机的切换管理研究综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;22(17):6424. doi: 10.3390/s22176424.
8
Drone-Augmented Human Vision: Exocentric Control for Drones Exploring Hidden Areas.无人机增强人眼视觉:用于探索隐藏区域的无人机外部控制。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Apr;24(4):1437-1446. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794058.
9
Identifying Factors of User Acceptance of a Drone-Based Medication Delivery: User-Centered Design Approach.基于用户为中心的设计方法确定用户对无人机药物投递的接受度的影响因素。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 30;11:e51587. doi: 10.2196/51587.
10
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A new truck-drone routing problem for parcel delivery by considering energy consumption and altitude.撤回文章:一种考虑能耗和高度的新型包裹递送卡车-无人机路径规划问题
Ann Oper Res. 2023 May 22;337(Suppl 1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05381-8. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Resisting technological inevitability: Google Wing's delivery drones and the fight for our skies.抵制技术必然性:谷歌 Wing 的送货无人机与我们天空的争夺战。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2024 Dec 16;382(2285):20240107. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0107. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
"Of course, drones delivering urgent medicines are necessary. But I would not use them until…" Insights from a qualitative study on users' needs and requirements regarding the use of medical drones.当然,运送紧急药品的无人机是必要的。但在……之前,我不会使用它们。关于使用医疗无人机,用户需求的定性研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0285393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285393. eCollection 2023.
3
Integrating drones in response to public health emergencies: A combined framework to explore technology acceptance.
将无人机融入应对公共卫生突发事件的综合框架:探索技术接受度。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:1019626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1019626. eCollection 2022.
4
Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones.风险认知与公众对无人机的接受度
Risk Anal. 2015 Jun;35(6):1167-83. doi: 10.1111/risa.12330. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.