Suppr超能文献

加拿大的兽医护理服务:对动物保健组织及干预措施的横断面调查

Access to veterinary care in Canada: a cross-sectional survey of animal healthcare organizations and interventions.

作者信息

Rausch Quinn, Alhamdan Maryam, Bateman Shane, Evason Michelle, Fraser-Celin Valli, Graham Courtney, Saad Jamie, Tuma Michelle, Ward Karen, Van Patter Lauren

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 30;12:1581316. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1581316. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many Canadians struggle to access healthcare for their animals, but little data is available from the Canadian context on how barriers to care are being addressed, and with what effects.

METHODS

The aim of this research was to characterize service providing organizations, barrier mitigation tools, community partnerships, and evaluation metrics used by organizations attempting to increase access to animal healthcare in Canada. In this study, we conducted online data mining and a cross-sectional, mixed-methods organizational survey.

RESULTS

Responses to the survey ( = 97) were received from non-profit organizations (52%), for-profit clinics (38%), and several municipal or governmental services (4%) and educational institutes (5%). Commonly reported tools included no cost or low-cost services, pop-up clinics and providing items to assist with pet transportation, with many other tools (payment plans without a credit check, services in multiple languages, availability of assistive technology) being employed by fewer than 20% of responding organizations. Only 38% of organizations used at least one tool from each of the four categories of barriers. Community involvement in programs ranged from simply accessing the service when it was available (outreach) to giving occasional feedback on their experiences (consulting), being employed or volunteering in program provision (collaborating), and community leadership partnering on initiatives (sharing leadership). Program evaluation most often involved quantitative measures of service usage with fewer organizations formally soliciting feedback from the community or looking at long-term health impacts.

DISCUSSION

Responses demonstrate that organizations employ a wide range of tools to mitigate access to veterinary care barriers primarily along financial and geographical lines, and to a lesser extent with tools targeting cultural or disability-related barriers highlighting the importance of building capacity around addressing multiple intersecting barriers. Study findings provide a baseline characterization of current efforts by Canadian organizations to mitigate barriers to accessing animal healthcare.

摘要

引言

许多加拿大人在为他们的动物获取医疗保健方面面临困难,但关于加拿大如何应对医疗保健障碍以及产生了何种影响的数据却很少。

方法

本研究的目的是描述那些试图增加加拿大动物医疗保健可及性的服务提供组织、障碍缓解工具、社区伙伴关系以及组织使用的评估指标。在本研究中,我们进行了在线数据挖掘以及一项横断面、混合方法的组织调查。

结果

收到了来自非营利组织(52%)、营利性诊所(38%)、几个市政或政府服务部门(4%)以及教育机构(5%)对调查的回复(n = 97)。常见的报告工具包括免费或低成本服务、流动诊所以及提供协助宠物运输的物品,而许多其他工具(无需信用检查的支付计划、多语言服务、辅助技术的可用性)只有不到20%的回复组织使用。只有38%的组织使用了来自四类障碍中的每一类的至少一种工具。社区对项目的参与程度从在服务可用时简单地使用服务(外展)到偶尔就他们的经历提供反馈(咨询)、在项目提供中受雇或志愿服务(合作)以及在倡议中担任社区领导伙伴(共享领导权)。项目评估最常涉及服务使用的定量测量,只有较少的组织正式征求社区的反馈或关注长期健康影响。

讨论

回复表明,组织采用了广泛的工具来缓解获取兽医护理障碍,主要是在财务和地理方面,在较小程度上使用针对文化或与残疾相关障碍的工具,这凸显了围绕应对多个交叉障碍建设能力的重要性。研究结果提供了加拿大组织当前为缓解获取动物医疗保健障碍所做努力的基线描述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf5/12162722/4cc8718d145c/fvets-12-1581316-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验