• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾结石微创治疗的全球研究趋势:文献计量分析(2015 - 2024年)

Global research trends in minimally invasive treatments for kidney stones: A bibliometric analysis (2015-2024).

作者信息

Ates Tunahan, Sukur Ibrahim Halil, Ok Fesih, Arikan Mehmet Gurkan, Akdogan Nebil

机构信息

Department of Urology, Defne State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 16;53(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01785-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-025-01785-2
PMID:40522467
Abstract

The prevalence of kidney stone disease has been increasing globally, resulting in a rise in minimally invasive treatment methods. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) have become standard procedures. This study aims to evaluate global publication trends in this field over the last decade. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection database. A total of 3,693 articles published between 2015 and 2024 were analyzed. VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R package were used for data visualization, which included co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and thematic evolution mapping. However, this analysis did not differentiate between various author roles, which may have influenced the perceived scientific impact of certain researchers, potentially favoring those with strong political or organizational affiliations. China, Turkey, and the USA were the top contributors to publications, with the USA ranking first in total citations. The number of studies has significantly increased over the past decade, indicating a growing trend. The most studied procedures were PCNL and related techniques, followed by RIRS, which has become more popular due to advancements in laser technology and flexible ureteroscopy. Thematic analysis identified trends in postoperative outcomes, complication management, and predictive models for treatment success. Thematic evolution mapping showed a decline in SWL studies, but an increase in interest in ECIRS and multimodal approaches. Minimally invasive kidney stone treatments have advanced significantly, with PCNL remaining the gold standard for large stones and RIRS emerging as a competitive alternative. Future research should focus on optimizing surgical outcomes, integrating AI-based decision support systems, and expanding international collaborations to enhance patient care.

摘要

全球肾结石疾病的患病率一直在上升,导致微创治疗方法的增加。经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)、逆行肾内手术(RIRS)、体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)和内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)已成为标准手术。本研究旨在评估过去十年该领域的全球发表趋势。使用科学网核心合集数据库进行了文献计量分析。分析了2015年至2024年期间发表的3693篇文章。使用VOSviewer和Bibliometrix R包进行数据可视化,包括共同作者网络、关键词共现分析和主题演变映射。然而,该分析没有区分不同的作者角色,这可能影响了某些研究人员的科学影响力认知,可能有利于那些具有强大政治或组织背景的人。中国、土耳其和美国是出版物的主要贡献者,美国在总被引次数方面排名第一。在过去十年中,研究数量显著增加,表明呈增长趋势。研究最多的手术是PCNL及其相关技术,其次是RIRS,由于激光技术和软性输尿管镜的进步,RIRS变得更受欢迎。主题分析确定了术后结果、并发症管理和治疗成功预测模型方面的趋势。主题演变映射显示SWL研究有所下降,但对ECIRS和多模式方法的兴趣有所增加。微创肾结石治疗取得了显著进展,PCNL仍然是大结石的金标准,而RIRS则成为一种有竞争力的替代方法。未来的研究应侧重于优化手术结果、整合基于人工智能的决策支持系统以及扩大国际合作以改善患者护理。

相似文献

1
Global research trends in minimally invasive treatments for kidney stones: A bibliometric analysis (2015-2024).肾结石微创治疗的全球研究趋势:文献计量分析(2015 - 2024年)
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 16;53(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01785-2.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
3
Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗小儿上尿路结石的最佳治疗方法:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2.
4
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的无石率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. eCollection 2019.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 与经皮肾镜碎石取石术 (PCNL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 治疗肾结石的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.逆行性肾内手术、标准及迷你经皮肾镜取石术以及冲击波碎石术治疗1-2厘米肾结石的成本效益分析
Urology. 2021 Oct;156:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
9
Global Web Trends Analysis of Minimally Invasive Urinary Stone Treatment in the Last Decade and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.过去十年及新冠疫情期间微创尿路结石治疗的全球网络趋势分析
J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1271-1276. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0086. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术、经皮肾镜取石术及微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19403. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019403.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning models to predict systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后全身炎症反应综合征的机器学习模型预测。
BMC Urol. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01529-1.
2
Develop a radiomics-based machine learning model to predict the stone-free rate post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.建立基于放射组学的机器学习模型,以预测经皮肾镜取石术后的无石率。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 13;52(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01562-7.
3
PCNL vs. two staged RIRS for kidney stones greater than 20 mm: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
经皮肾镜碎石术与两阶段输尿管软镜碎石术治疗大于 20mm 肾结石的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Feb;76(1):31-41. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05577-5.
4
Machine learning algorithm to predict postoperative bleeding complications after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.预测侧卧位经皮肾镜取石术后出血并发症的机器学习算法
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 26;103(4):e37050. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037050.
5
Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones (> 1 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials.微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗上尿路结石(> 1cm)的疗效和安全性:18 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01341-3.
6
Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials.各种内镜手术治疗大肾结石的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 8;51(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01459-x.
7
Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022.最佳介入性尿路结石管理实践:2022 年欧洲泌尿外科学会尿路结石指南专家组更新。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下联合肾脏内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗大体积复杂肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2022 Jul;36(7):865-876. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0761. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
A Longitudinal Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials for Surgical Interventions to Treat Nephrolithiasis Over 16 Years (2002 to 2017).16 年来(2002 年至 2017 年)外科干预治疗肾结石随机对照试验报告质量的纵向评估。
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):502-508. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0649. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
10
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的无石率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. eCollection 2019.