Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings.

INTRODUCTION

The model of emotional intelligence as an ability has evolved since its introduction 35 years ago. The revised model includes that emotional intelligence (EI) is a broad intelligence within the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model of intelligence, and that more areas of problem solving are involved than originally detailed. An argument is made here that scoring of EI test responses is a sound procedure relative to scoring keys based on expert consensus or a single emotion theory. To the degree that EI fits present-day theories of intelligence (i.e., the CHC model), any subsidiary factors of EI reasoning should correlate highly with one another. These and other considerations led to a revision of the original Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) to the MSCEIT 2.

METHODS

The MSCEIT 2 was developed and tested across 5 studies: Two preliminary studies concerned, first, the viability of new item sets (Study 1, = 43) and, in Study 2 ( = 8), the development of a veridical scoring key for each test item with the assistance of Ph.D. area experts. Next, a pilot study (Study 3, = 523) and a normative study (Study 4, = 3,000) each focused on the test's item performance and factor structure, including whether a four-domain model continued to fit the data in a manner consistent with a cohesive broad intelligence. Study 5 ( = 221) examined the relation between the original and revised tests.

RESULTS

The studies provide evidence for factor-supported subscale scores, and good reliability at the overall test level, with acceptable reliabilities for 3 of the 4 subscale scores, and adequate measurement precision across the range of most test-takers' abilities.

DISCUSSION

Overall, the MSCEIT 2 used updated theory to guide its construction and development. Its test scores fit the CHC model, and correlate with the original MSCEIT. The revised test is 33% shorter than the original.