Mayer John D, Salovey Peter, Caruso David R, Sitarenios Gill
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824, USA.
Emotion. 2003 Mar;3(1):97-105. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.97.
Does a recently introduced ability scale adequately measure emotional intelligence (EI) skills? Using the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT; J. D. Mayer, P. Salovey, & D. R. Caruso, 2002b), the authors examined (a) whether members of a general standardization sample and emotions experts identified the same test answers as correct, (b) the test's reliability, and (c) the possible factor structures of EI. Twenty-one emotions experts endorsed many of the same answers, as did 2,112 members of the standardization sample, and exhibited superior agreement, particularly when research provides clearer answers to test questions (e.g., emotional perception in faces). The MSCEIT achieved reasonable reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis supported theoretical models of EI. These findings help clarify issues raised in earlier articles published in Emotion.
最近推出的一项能力量表能否充分测量情商(EI)技能?作者使用梅耶-萨洛维-卡鲁索情商测试(MSCEIT;J.D. 梅耶、P. 萨洛维与D.R. 卡鲁索,2002b),研究了以下几点:(a)一般标准化样本的成员和情绪专家是否将相同的测试答案认定为正确答案;(b)该测试的信度;以及(c)EI可能的因素结构。21位情绪专家认可了许多相同的答案,标准化样本中的2112名成员也是如此,并且表现出了更高的一致性,尤其是当研究为测试问题提供了更清晰的答案时(例如,面部表情中的情绪感知)。MSCEIT具有合理的信度,验证性因素分析支持了EI的理论模型。这些发现有助于澄清《情感》杂志早期发表的文章中提出的问题。