Suppr超能文献

在词汇语义特征、情感、亚临床抑郁症状和沉思的交叉点:抽象词和具体词情感启动的线性混合效应模型。

At the crossroad of lexical-semantic features, affect, subclinical depressive symptoms and rumination: a linear mixed-effects model of emotional priming in abstract and concrete words.

作者信息

Misir Emre

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Interdisciplinary Neuroscience, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2025 May;47(4):386-403. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2521019. Epub 2025 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Emotional priming is modulated by word concreteness, yet the literature is inconsistent. This study investigates the effects of affect, lexical features, depressive symptoms, and rumination on emotional priming for abstract and concrete words.

METHODS

Eighty-one healthy participants (48 female, age = 24.12 ± 8.56 years) completed a valence categorization task in which they were asked to decide whether a target word, presented for 500 ms following a 65 ms prime, was pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant. Priming effect (PE) was defined as the RT difference between incongruent and congruent conditions for pleasant and unpleasant primes. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess priming effects and error rates, with fixed effects for prime valence, concreteness, subscales of Positive and Negative Affect Scale, Beck Depression Inventory score, subscales of Rumination Response Scale, semantic relatedness and Levenshtein distance (LD). Model selection was performed using the buildmer algorithm. Post-hoc analyses of interactions and continuous predictor trends across categorical levels were performed using emmeans and emtrends. All statistical analyses were conducted by R 4.4.3.

RESULTS

PEs were stronger for concrete than abstract words, irrespective of prime valence. Positive affect predicted higher error rates for unpleasant targets and enhanced PEs for unpleasant primes, particularly in abstract words. Depressive symptoms were associated with fewer errors for unpleasant targets but did not predict PE. Brooding was associated with larger PEs for abstract words, independent of valence. Lastly, greater semantic relatedness amplified PEs for abstract items, whereas smaller LD both strengthened PEs and increased errors in valence‑incongruent trials.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the role of emotional and clinical traits in word processing, showing that abstract word priming is driven by the interaction of affect and stimulus value. Future studies examining biases in abstract emotional word processing may guide the development of methods to identify individuals at risk for depression.

摘要

目的

情绪启动受词语具体性的调节,但相关文献的结论并不一致。本研究调查了情感、词汇特征、抑郁症状和沉思对抽象词和具体词情绪启动的影响。

方法

81名健康参与者(48名女性,年龄 = 24.12 ± 8.56岁)完成了一项效价分类任务,要求他们判断在65毫秒的启动刺激后呈现500毫秒的目标词是愉快的、中性的还是不愉快的。启动效应(PE)被定义为愉快和不愉快启动刺激下不一致和一致条件之间的反应时差异。使用线性混合效应模型评估启动效应和错误率,固定效应包括启动刺激效价、具体性、正负情感量表子量表、贝克抑郁量表得分、沉思反应量表子量表、语义相关性和莱文斯坦距离(LD)。使用buildmer算法进行模型选择。使用emmeans和emtrends对跨分类水平的交互作用和连续预测变量趋势进行事后分析。所有统计分析均由R 4.4.3完成。

结果

无论启动刺激效价如何,具体词的PE均强于抽象词。积极情感预测不愉快目标的错误率更高,且不愉快启动刺激的PE增强,尤其是在抽象词中。抑郁症状与不愉快目标的错误较少相关,但不能预测PE。沉思与抽象词的较大PE相关,与效价无关。最后,更大的语义相关性放大了抽象项目的PE,而较小的LD既增强了PE,又增加了效价不一致试验中的错误。

结论

本研究强调了情绪和临床特征在词语加工中的作用,表明抽象词启动受情感和刺激价值相互作用的驱动。未来研究抽象情绪词加工中的偏差可能会指导识别抑郁症风险个体方法的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验