Alemu Biresaw Wassihun, Waller Michael, Tooth Leigh R
Australian Women and Girl's Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025 Aug;98(6):537-547. doi: 10.1007/s00420-025-02152-9. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
To examine the associations between shift or night work and irregular periods and period pain among two cohorts of Australian women, using data collected 16 years apart.
We used data from the 1989-95 (n = 6,767) and 1973-78 (n = 7,527) cohorts from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, when participants were aged 24-30 years. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between night or shift work and severe period pain and irregular periods, and to compare them to non-shift or night workers.
Women from the 1989-95 cohort who did night work reported higher odds of having experienced irregular periods (AOR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59) compared to those who undertook shift work. However, there was no association between night work and severe period pain (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.41). Among women in the 1973-78 cohort, neither severe period pain (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.76) nor irregular periods (AOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.92, 2.06) were associated with night work. Across both cohorts, no associations were found between shift or night work and irregular or severe period pain when comparing shift or night workers combined to non-shift or night workers.
Night workers reported higher odds of irregular periods compared to shift workers in the 1989-95 cohort; however, no consistent association was found with severe period pain. Future research should investigate whether this association is causal. Supportive workplace practices may benefit night workers experiencing irregular periods.
利用相隔16年收集的数据,研究澳大利亚两个女性队列中轮班或夜班工作与月经不调和经期疼痛之间的关联。
我们使用了澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究中1989 - 1995年队列(n = 6767)和1973 - 1978年队列(n = 7527)的数据,当时参与者年龄在24 - 30岁。采用逻辑回归模型评估夜班或轮班工作与严重经期疼痛和月经不调之间的关联,并将其与非轮班或非夜班工作者进行比较。
与从事轮班工作的女性相比,1989 - 1995年队列中从事夜班工作的女性报告经历月经不调的几率更高(调整后的比值比[AOR]=1.28,95%置信区间[CI]:1.03,1.59)。然而,夜班工作与严重经期疼痛之间没有关联(AOR = 1.10,95% CI:0.86,1.41)。在1973 - 1978年队列的女性中,严重经期疼痛(AOR = 1.20,95% CI:0.82,1.76)和月经不调(AOR = 1.38,95% CI:0.92,2.06)均与夜班工作无关。在两个队列中,将轮班或夜班工作者与非轮班或非夜班工作者进行比较时,未发现轮班或夜班工作与月经不调或严重经期疼痛之间存在关联。
在1989 - 1995年队列中,与轮班工作者相比,夜班工作者报告月经不调几率更高;然而,未发现与严重经期疼痛存在一致关联。未来研究应调查这种关联是否具有因果关系。支持性的工作场所措施可能会使经历月经不调的夜班工作者受益。