• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与腹腔镜减重手术吻合口漏发生率的比较:一项代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库研究

Comparing Anastomotic Leak Rate Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Procedures: A Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database Study.

作者信息

Jones Alexandria, Hall Alexander, Nandipati Kalyana

机构信息

Creighton University, Omaha, United States.

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, United States.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07935-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07935-0
PMID:40526322
Abstract

In this MBSAQIP database study of over 560,000 bariatric procedures, the overall incidence of anastomotic leaks was 0.21%. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was associated with a significantly higher leak rate compared to the laparoscopic approach. No significant differences in leak rates were observed between robotic and laparoscopic techniques for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or duodenal switch. Prior foregut surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with increased risk of leak across all procedures.

摘要

在这项对超过560,000例减肥手术的MBSAQIP数据库研究中,吻合口漏的总体发生率为0.21%。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人袖状胃切除术(SG)的漏率显著更高。在Roux-en-Y胃旁路术或十二指肠转位术的机器人手术和腹腔镜手术之间,未观察到漏率有显著差异。既往前肠手术和术中放置引流管与所有手术中漏的风险增加独立相关。

相似文献

1
Comparing Anastomotic Leak Rate Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Procedures: A Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database Study.机器人与腹腔镜减重手术吻合口漏发生率的比较:一项代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07935-0.
2
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has higher complication rates compared to laparoscopic: 8-year analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic primary bariatric surgery.与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人袖状胃切除术并发症发生率更高:机器人与腹腔镜初次减肥手术的8年分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Apr;21(4):372-381. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.014. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
3
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助减重手术翻修术的疗效:一项对MBSAQIP数据库的回顾性病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1573-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Six-year analysis of 30-day post-operative leaks for primary sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP database study.原发性袖状胃切除术术后30天渗漏的六年分析:一项MBSAQIP数据库研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7451-7458. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11190-2. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
5
Comparison of early perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted bariatric surgery vs laparoscopic bariatric surgery in a center of excellence.在一家卓越中心对机器人辅助减肥手术与腹腔镜减肥手术的早期围手术期结果进行比较。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4608-4614. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11852-9. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
6
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric-metabolic surgery. Are we still expecting to overcome the learning curve? A propensity score-matched analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.腹腔镜与机器人辅助原发性减重代谢手术。我们是否仍期望克服学习曲线?代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Sep;20(9):831-839. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
The safety profile of one-anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program analysis.单吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的安全性比较:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Dec;20(12):1351-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.035. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
8
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
Postoperative outcomes following revision or conversion surgery after primary sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.初次袖状胃切除术后翻修或转换手术的术后结局:MBSAQIP数据库分析
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Aug;21(8):956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.04.003. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
10
Bariatric surgery in patients with preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation: a 2015-2021 MBSAQIP database study.术前抗凝治疗患者的减重手术:2015-2021 年 MBSAQIP 数据库研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Dec;20(12):1260-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity surgery: Which procedure should we choose and why?肥胖症手术:我们应该选择哪种手术方式以及原因是什么?
J Visc Surg. 2023 Apr;160(2S):S30-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after learning curve: 30-day and 12-month outcomes.学习曲线后机器人和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:30 天和 12 个月的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1257-1263. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01384-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
Robotic Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery.机器人辅助原发性和复发性减重手术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):417-430. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
4
Changes in Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in the United States From 1993 to 2016.美国 1993 年至 2016 年减重手术利用情况的变化。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):201-209. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003554.
5
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study.减重手术后常规腹部引流的作用:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Dec;13(12):1997-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.降低胃肠道漏率:机器人与腹腔镜胃旁路术的对比分析。
J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):159-63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0104-8. Epub 2008 Sep 2.