• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低胃肠道漏率:机器人与腹腔镜胃旁路术的对比分析。

Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

机构信息

The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Suite 4.294, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):159-63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0104-8. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-008-0104-8
PMID:27628253
Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has been described for many general surgery procedures, including gastric bypass. This is a comparative study looking at the short-term outcomes and technical differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRNY) and robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RARNY). Our database was reviewed for all Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures performed over the last 5 years. Operative times, length of stay, and all complications listed for the 90 days postoperatively were recorded and statistically analyzed. A total of 356 LRNY and 249 RARNY were performed. The average body mass index (BMI), age, and sex were similar between groups. On average, the RARNY took 17 min longer than the LRNY, this difference being significant (p < 0.01). Average length of stay for the two groups was similar (~3 days). There were a total of 51 complications in the standard laparoscopic group (14%), of which 14 (3.9%) were major complications. In the robotic group, there were 35 (14%) complications, of which 9 (3.6%) were major complications. The only significant difference in complication rate was for anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy: there were no leaks in the robotic series, and six (1.7%) in the standard laparoscopic series (p = 0.04). Length of stay and overall complication rates were similar for RARNY and LRNY. There was no mortality in either group, and the complication rate was lower than literature standards. While the RARNY took longer, there was a significantly lower gastrointestinal leak rate in this group.

摘要

机器人辅助手术已被用于许多普通外科手术,包括胃旁路术。这是一项比较研究,旨在观察腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRNY)和机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RARNY)的短期结果和技术差异。我们对过去 5 年中进行的所有 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的数据库进行了回顾。记录并统计分析了术后 90 天内的手术时间、住院时间和所有列出的并发症。共进行了 356 例 LRNY 和 249 例 RARNY。两组的平均体重指数(BMI)、年龄和性别相似。平均而言,RARNY 比 LRNY 长 17 分钟,这一差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。两组的平均住院时间相似(~3 天)。标准腹腔镜组共有 51 例并发症(14%),其中 14 例(3.9%)为严重并发症。在机器人组中,共有 35 例(14%)并发症,其中 9 例(3.6%)为严重并发症。并发症发生率唯一显著差异是胃空肠吻合口漏:机器人组无漏,标准腹腔镜组有 6 例(1.7%)(p = 0.04)。RARNY 和 LRNY 的住院时间和总并发症发生率相似。两组均无死亡病例,并发症发生率低于文献标准。虽然 RARNY 时间较长,但该组的胃肠道漏率明显较低。

相似文献

1
Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.降低胃肠道漏率:机器人与腹腔镜胃旁路术的对比分析。
J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):159-63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0104-8. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
2
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.779.
3
Short-term outcomes for super-super obese (BMI > or =60 kg/m2) patients undergoing weight loss surgery at a high-volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and open tubular gastric bypass.在一家大型减肥手术中心接受减肥手术的超级肥胖(BMI≥60 kg/m²)患者的短期结局:腹腔镜可调节胃束带术、腹腔镜胃旁路术和开放式管状胃旁路术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.10.013. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
4
Laparoscopic, hybrid, and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜、杂交及全机器人Roux-en-Y胃旁路术
J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0559-y. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses.在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术的学习曲线期间,机器人辅助可提供出色的手术效果:100例机器人辅助胃旁路手术的结果
Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):746-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.038.
6
Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.全机器人腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与传统腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的比较
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Nov-Dec;1(6):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.08.008.
7
Intraoperative endoscopic pneumatic testing for gastrojejunal anastomotic integrity during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中用于检测胃空肠吻合口完整性的术中内镜气压测试
Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1403-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9175-7. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
8
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese and super morbidly obese patients.肥胖症和超级肥胖症患者的腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术
Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):230-2; discussion 232. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.017.
9
Laparoscopic repair of gastrointestinal leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass.腹腔镜胃旁路术后胃肠道漏的腹腔镜修复术。
Am Surg. 2006 Jul;72(7):586-90; discussion 590-1.
10
Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice.腹腔镜胃旁路手术到机器人辅助胃旁路手术:学术性外科实践培训和转型所涉及的时间和成本投入。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Jun;10(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0567-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Anastomotic Leak Rate Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Procedures: A Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database Study.机器人与腹腔镜减重手术吻合口漏发生率的比较:一项代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07935-0.
2
The Trajectory of Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Open to Laparoscopic to Robotic.减重手术的修正轨迹:从开放手术到腹腔镜手术再到机器人手术。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 25;13(7):1878. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071878.
3
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a morbidly obese patient in Korea: a case report.

本文引用的文献

1
[Usefullness of the Da Vinci robot in urologic surgery].[达芬奇机器人在泌尿外科手术中的实用性]
Rev Med Suisse. 2007 Dec 5;3(136):2766-8, 2770, 2772.
2
Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons.腹腔镜胃旁路手术技术:美国肥胖症外科医师协会执业外科医生在线调查
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
3
Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
韩国一名病态肥胖患者的全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术:病例报告
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Mar 15;26(1):40-42. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.1.40.
4
Evaluation of the learning curve for robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy.机器人辅助单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术联合袖状胃切除术学习曲线的评估
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 22;9:969418. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.969418. eCollection 2022.
5
Robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after learning curve: 30-day and 12-month outcomes.学习曲线后机器人和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:30 天和 12 个月的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1257-1263. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01384-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a High-Volume Center Experience.机器人辅助减重手术翻修术:大容量中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1656-1663. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05174-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
7
Outcomes of primary versus revisional robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter analysis of ten-year experience.初次与再次机器人辅助腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结果:十年经验的多中心分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5766-5773. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08061-x. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Cost Analysis of Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Single Academic Center: How Expensive Is Expensive?单中心机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的成本分析:昂贵有多贵?
Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4860-4866. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04881-x. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Bariatric Procedure: a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术作为一种减肥手术的翻修术:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):11-17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04117-7.
10
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
机器人辅助Heller肌切开术:一种术后生活质量指标更高的安全手术。
Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.003.
4
Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃空肠吻合术的并发症:21毫米和25毫米圆形吻合器的比较
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
5
Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers.学术医疗中心腹腔镜与开腹胃旁路手术的应用及结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Aug;205(2):248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
6
The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience.首例完全机器人辅助食管癌切除术加三野淋巴结清扫术:初步经验
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9405-7. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
7
Anastomotic leak following antecolic versus retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.针对病态肥胖患者,经结肠前与经结肠后腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后吻合口漏的情况。
Obes Surg. 2007 Mar;17(3):292-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9048-8.
8
Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System.三维成像可提高使用达芬奇机器人系统的新手和经验丰富的操作者的手术表现。
Am J Surg. 2007 Apr;193(4):519-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042.
9
Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜胃癌扩大淋巴结清扫次全胃切除术的试点系列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1662-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9266-0. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
10
A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents.住院医师进行的机器人辅助、腹腔镜和手工缝合肠道吻合术的比较。
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):349-55; discussion 355. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.018.