Duffecy Jennifer, Rehman Arfa, Gorman Scott, Huang Yong Lin, Klumpp Heide
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois-Chicago, 912 S Wood, Chicago, IL, 60612, United States, 1 3124131225.
Chorus Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 17;13:e58204. doi: 10.2196/58204.
Background: Perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms affect many women's well-being and quality of life. Digital technologies, especially smartphones, allow self-management interventions for menopausal symptoms, but they are understudied., Objective: We evaluated whether a novel digital care app, Caria, effectively reduced vasomotor and behavioral health symptoms of menopause., Methods: We enrolled 149 women for a 6-week randomized controlled trial (app treatment: n=112; web-based educational control: n=37). Enrolled participants had problematic vasomotor symptoms and at least one elevated behavioral health symptom (depression, anxiety, or sleep issues). Web-based self-reported assessments (Hot Flush Rating Scale [HFRS], Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 [PHQ-8], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]) were conducted at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks., Results: For hot flash severity (HFRS; treatment baseline mean 16.4, SD 6.7 to 6-wk mean 13.6, SD 6.6; control: baseline mean 19.1, SD 7.3 to 6-wk mean 17.8, SD 7.2), a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed main effects for time (F2,262=9.82; P<.001) and treatment arm (F1,131=6.08; P=.01) and a significant time × treatment arm interaction (F2,262=3.23; P=.04); the treatment arm showed lower hot flash severity than the control arm (t147=2.72; P=.007). For depression scores (PHQ-8; treatment baseline mean 14.0, SD 3.8 to 6-wk mean 11.2, SD 5.3; control baseline mean 15.0, SD 3.7 to 6-wk mean 13.4, SD 4.1), a repeated-measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time in the treatment arm (F2,96=15.2; P<.001) but not the control arm (F2,40=2.0; P=.15). Follow-up 2-tailed paired t tests in the treatment arm showed depression decreased from baseline to week 3 (t49=3.3; P=.002) and from weeks 3 to 6 (t48=2.3; P=.02). For sleep quality scores (PSQI; treatment baseline mean 10.7, SD 3.1 to 6-wk mean 10.0, SD 3.5; control baseline mean 11.5, SD 3.7 to 6-wk mean 11.0, SD 3.7), the repeated-measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time in the treatment arm (F2,186=7.8; P=.001) but not the control arm (F2,62=1.3; P=.28). Follow-up 2-tailed paired t tests in the treatment arm showed a significant decrease in sleep issues from baseline to week 3 (t95=3.9; P<.001) but no change from weeks 3 to 6 (t93=0.2; P=.81). Participants with elevated anxiety symptoms showed decreased symptoms in both the treatment and control groups. App engagement was high (average logins over 6 weeks: 53.2)., Conclusions: The findings highlight the potential of digital interventions for mitigating menopausal vasomotor and behavioral health symptoms. Significant improvements in the intervention group underscore the app's effectiveness in providing relief from some of the most challenging aspects of menopause. This study contributes to the evidence supporting digital health interventions in managing menopausal symptoms, presenting a promising avenue for accessible and scalable solutions for women in midlife.
围绝经期和绝经症状会影响许多女性的幸福感和生活质量。数字技术,尤其是智能手机,可用于对绝经症状进行自我管理干预,但相关研究较少。
我们评估了一款新型数字护理应用程序Caria是否能有效减轻绝经后的血管舒缩症状和行为健康症状。
我们招募了149名女性参与一项为期6周的随机对照试验(应用程序治疗组:n = 112;基于网络的教育对照组:n = 37)。入选的参与者有血管舒缩症状问题,且至少有一种行为健康症状(抑郁、焦虑或睡眠问题)有所加重。在基线、3周和6周时进行基于网络的自我报告评估(潮热评分量表[HFRS]、患者健康问卷抑郁量表-8[PHQ-8]、广泛性焦虑障碍-7和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI])。
对于潮热严重程度(HFRS;治疗组基线均值16.4,标准差6.7至6周均值13.6,标准差6.6;对照组:基线均值19.1,标准差7.3至6周均值17.8,标准差7.2),重复测量方差分析显示时间的主效应(F2,262 = 9.82;P <.001)和治疗组的主效应(F1,131 = 6.08;P =.01)以及时间×治疗组的显著交互作用(F2,262 = 3.23;P =.04);治疗组潮热严重程度低于对照组(t147 = 2.72;P =.007)。对于抑郁评分(PHQ-8;治疗组基线均值14.0,标准差3.8至6周均值11.2,标准差5.3;对照组基线均值15.0,标准差3.7至6周均值13.4,标准差4.1),重复测量方差分析显示治疗组有时间的主效应(F2,96 = 15.2;P <.001),而对照组没有(F2,40 = 2.0;P =.15)。治疗组的后续双尾配对t检验显示,抑郁从基线到第3周有所下降(t49 = 3.3;P =.002)以及从第3周到第6周有所下降(t48 = 2.3;P =.02)。对于睡眠质量评分(PSQI;治疗组基线均值10.7,标准差3.1至6周均值10.0,标准差3.5;对照组基线均值11.