• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别差异对直肠癌经肛门内镜手术术后并发症危险因素的影响:一项日本大规模多中心队列研究

Impact of sex differences on risk factors for postoperative complications in transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a large-scale Japanese multicenter cohort study.

作者信息

Miyake Toru, Matsuda Takeru, Takemasa Ichiro, Shibutani Masatsune, Suwa Hirokazu, Terai Shiro, Tani Masaji, Kakeji Yoshihiro, Yamamoto Seiichiro, Naitoh Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, -5-2 Kusunoki-Chou, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4839-4847. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11878-z. Epub 2025 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11878-z
PMID:40528078
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a novel, minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer. Sex-based anatomical differences such as pelvic morphology may influence surgical difficulty and outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between sex differences and postoperative complications for patients who have undergone TaTME.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted across 26 Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery centers and included 702 patients who underwent TaTME for the treatment of primary rectal cancer between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration, had recurrent or multiple cancers, or ulcerative colitis were excluded. The primary end point of this study was major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo [CD] grade III or higher) within 30 days of surgery. Patient characteristics, operative details, and short-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 484 men (68.9%) and 218 women (31.1%), of whom 310 (44.2%) underwent preoperative therapy. A total of 88 patients (12.5%) had CD grade III or higher complications, with a higher incidence in men (14.7%) than women (7.8%) (P = 0.010). In 532 patients with lower rectal tumors located within 5 cm from the anal verge, male sex remained associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications (40.8 vs. 25.4%, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the following as independent risk factors for major complications: male sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.200-3.800, P = 0.010), circumferential tumor (HR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.130-2.950, P = 0.014), operative time > 479 min (HR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.010-2.670, P = 0.046), and intraoperative complications during TaTME (HR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.010-4.670, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications in TaTME for rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)是一种用于治疗直肠癌的新型微创手术。骨盆形态等基于性别的解剖学差异可能会影响手术难度和预后。本研究旨在调查接受TaTME治疗的患者性别差异与术后并发症之间的相关性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究在26个日本腹腔镜结直肠外科学会中心进行,纳入了2012年1月至2019年12月期间接受TaTME治疗原发性直肠癌的702例患者。排除接受盆腔脏器清除术、患有复发性或多发性癌症或溃疡性结肠炎的患者。本研究的主要终点是术后30天内的主要术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo[CD]Ⅲ级或更高)。分析了患者特征、手术细节和短期预后。

结果

本研究包括484名男性(68.9%)和218名女性(31.1%),其中310名(44.2%)接受了术前治疗。共有88例患者(12.5%)发生CDⅢ级或更高等级的并发症,男性发生率(14.7%)高于女性(7.8%)(P=0.010)。在532例距肛缘5 cm以内的低位直肠肿瘤患者中,男性术后并发症发生率仍然较高(40.8%对25.4%,P=0.001)。多因素分析确定以下因素为主要并发症的独立危险因素:男性(风险比[HR]=2.13,95%置信区间[CI]1.200-3.800,P=0.010)、环周肿瘤(HR=1.82,95%CI 1.130-2.950,P=0.014)、手术时间>479分钟(HR=1.64,95%CI 1.010-2.670,P=0.046)以及TaTME术中并发症(HR=2.17,95%CI 1.010-4.670,P=0.048)。

结论

男性是直肠癌TaTME术后并发症的重要危险因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of sex differences on risk factors for postoperative complications in transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a large-scale Japanese multicenter cohort study.性别差异对直肠癌经肛门内镜手术术后并发症危险因素的影响:一项日本大规模多中心队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4839-4847. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11878-z. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Stoma Rate and Oncological Outcomes of Primary TaTME vs Completion TaTME in Patients With Early-Stage Rectal Cancer.早期直肠癌患者中,原发性经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与完成性TaTME的造口率及肿瘤学结局
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Aug 1;68(8):962-971. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003794. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
4
Comparing the perioperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes between robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies with a subgroup analysis for overweight patients.比较机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的围手术期、术后及肿瘤学结局:一项前瞻性研究的更新系统评价和荟萃分析,并对超重患者进行亚组分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 8;19(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02460-9.
5
The application of transanal total mesorectal excision for patients with middle and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术在中低位直肠癌患者中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11410. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011410.
6
Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 1;28(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02947-x.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?机器人辅助经腹全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析:哪种方法为中低位直肠腺癌提供最佳的短期疗效?
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Nov;25(11):1183-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02515-7. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis on complications of transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2527-2538. doi: 10.1111/codi.15792. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床结局及病例数量效应:一项系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):811-824. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Transanal total mesorectal excision for abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients: A word of caution from a multicentric Canadian cohort study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术用于腹会阴联合切除术与直肠癌患者不良肿瘤学结局相关:来自一项加拿大多中心队列研究的警示
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Apr;24(4):380-387. doi: 10.1111/codi.16033. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision and Risk Factors: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术后直肠癌的局部复发及危险因素:日本一项全国性多中心队列研究
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Jan 8;5(1):e369. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000369. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes.直肠癌手术中的性别差异:手术方式与结局的深入分析
World J Mens Health. 2024 Apr;42(2):304-320. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230335. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Transanal total mesorectal excision: single center study on risk factors for major complications.
经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:单中心主要并发症危险因素研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 19;13:1277979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277979. eCollection 2023.
4
Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled Anastomosis (TTSS): A comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除联合经肛门吻合(TTSS)与双吻合器技术和经肛门直肠全系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的吻合口漏率比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;47(12):3123-3129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌不断发展的外科和多学科治疗时代中环周切缘的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Aug;170(2):412-431. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.MRI 骨盆测量在预测开腹和微创全直肠系膜切除术技术难度和结局中的作用:系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):991-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
7
Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1808-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis.直肠系膜全切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与经肛门入路的比较——一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3908-3919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07160-8. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
Evaluation of anatomical pelvic parameters between normal, healthy men and women using three-dimensional computed tomography: a cross-sectional study of sex-specific and age-specific differences.使用三维计算机断层扫描评估正常健康男性和女性的骨盆解剖学参数:性别和年龄特异性差异的横断面研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 9;14(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1165-2.
10
The relationship between body mass index, sex, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer.接受结直肠癌潜在根治性手术患者的体重指数、性别与术后结局之间的关系。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Apr;30:185-189. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.12.084. Epub 2019 Jan 11.