• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果。

Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Leon, Leon, Spain.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1808-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4
PMID:32333158
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding the gold standard technique for rectal cancer as Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) may be safely performed either by open or minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic approach, however, may carry technical difficulties. For this reason, a novel technique has emerged in the last decade combining a dual laparoscopic dissection (abdominal and transanal) to perform the TME technique (TaTME). When focusing on oncological outcomes, there is a lack of literature regarding mid-long term results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the mid-term oncological impact of TaTME for treating rectal cancer.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre study was performed in four tertiary centres including consecutive patients who underwent TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer by the same group of experienced surgeons. The analysed data included pathological results on the quality of TME and mid-term oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 173 patients were included throughout a study period of 6 years. Our series included 70% males and 68% of patients with neoadjuvant treatments. The median follow-up was 23 [15-37.5] months. Regarding pathological results, a complete TME was achieved in 72.8%, while circumferential and distal margins were affected in 1.4 and 1.1%, respectively. Five patients developed local recurrences (3%) and 8.1% presented distant disease during the follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival and the overall survival rates were 88% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently a lack of evidence in the literature regarding TaTME and oncological outcomes with no data available from randomized clinical trials. In the meantime, the reported results from different multicentre series are controversial. This study showed positive mid-term outcomes at 2 years of follow-up and supported notable oncological outcomes with TaTME. However, it must be emphasized that previous experience in minimally invasive and transanal surgeries is essential for surgeons before intending to perform TaTME.

摘要

背景

目前对于直肠癌,尚无金标准治疗方法,全直肠系膜切除术(TME)既可以通过开放手术也可以通过微创手术安全施行。然而,腹腔镜手术可能存在技术困难。因此,在过去十年中出现了一种新的技术,即结合腹部和经肛门双重腹腔镜解剖来施行 TME 技术(TaTME)。当关注肿瘤学结果时,关于中远期结果的文献较少。本研究旨在评估 TaTME 治疗直肠癌的中期肿瘤学影响。

方法

在四家三级中心进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,纳入了同一组经验丰富的外科医生施行 TaTME 治疗中低位直肠癌的连续患者。分析的数据包括 TME 质量的病理结果和中期肿瘤学结果。

结果

在研究期间,共纳入了 173 例患者,中位随访时间为 23 [15-37.5] 个月。我们的系列研究包括 70%的男性和 68%的新辅助治疗患者。病理结果显示,完全 TME 达到 72.8%,而环周和远端切缘受影响的比例分别为 1.4%和 1.1%。5 例患者发生局部复发(3%),8.1%的患者在随访期间出现远处疾病。2 年无病生存率和总生存率分别为 88%和 95%。

结论

目前,关于 TaTME 和肿瘤学结果的文献证据不足,没有随机临床试验的数据。与此同时,不同多中心系列研究的报告结果存在争议。本研究显示了 2 年随访的中期阳性结果,并支持 TaTME 具有显著的肿瘤学结果。然而,必须强调的是,在打算施行 TaTME 之前,外科医生必须具备微创和经肛门手术的前期经验。

相似文献

1
Oncological safety of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: mid-term results of a prospective multicentre study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的肿瘤安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1808-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07579-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:超越学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4101-4109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07172-4. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
4
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
5
An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).国际多中心前瞻性直肠癌手术审计;手术方法与结果,包括经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20 Suppl 6:33-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.14376.
6
Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME.三种不同手术技术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)、腹腔镜 TME 和开腹 TME。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5248-5257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Transanal (TaTME) vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of early and long-term outcomes.经肛门(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:早期和长期结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2271-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04019-0. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-to-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):972-985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6527-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence.低位直肠癌治疗中保留括约肌的手术技术:当代证据的系统评价
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):107525. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.107525.
2
Impact of sex differences on risk factors for postoperative complications in transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a large-scale Japanese multicenter cohort study.性别差异对直肠癌经肛门内镜手术术后并发症危险因素的影响:一项日本大规模多中心队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4839-4847. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11878-z. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.挪威暂停经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):121-130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
Real-time navigation for laparoscopic hepatectomy using image fusion of preoperative 3D surgical plan and intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.基于术前 3D 手术计划与术中吲哚菁绿荧光成像图像融合的腹腔镜肝切除术实时导航。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3449-3459. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07121-1. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis.
Longitudinal follow-up of sexual function after surgery for ultra-low rectal cancers located within 5 cm of the anal verge: A multicentre collaborative study.
距肛缘5厘米以内的超低位直肠癌手术后性功能的纵向随访:一项多中心合作研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr;27(4):e70092. doi: 10.1111/codi.70092.
4
Oncologic outcomes following transanal total mesorectal excision: the United States experience.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结果:美国经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3703-3715. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10896-7. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Is survival after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) worse than that after traditional total mesorectal excision? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)后的生存率是否低于传统全直肠系膜切除术后的生存率?一项回顾性倾向评分调整队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb 20;39(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04591-7.
6
The role of transanal compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (taTME vs. lapTME) for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer in obese patients: outcomes of a multicenter propensity-matched analysis.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术)在肥胖患者中治疗中低位直肠癌的作用:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析的结果
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2191-2200. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01676-4. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
7
Multicenter phase II trial of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: preliminary results.多中心Ⅱ期经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床研究:初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9483-9508. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10266-9. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons' preference on rectal cancer treatment.国际大学结肠和直肠外科医生协会关于外科医生对直肠癌治疗偏好的调查。
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Aug;39(4):307-314. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00255.0036. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
9
Limitations and Concerns with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的局限性与相关问题
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Feb 28;35(2):141-145. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742115. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Clinical Status and Future Prospects of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的临床现状与未来展望
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 3;11:752737. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.752737. eCollection 2021.
直肠系膜全切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与经肛门入路的比较——一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3908-3919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07160-8. Epub 2019 Oct 15.