Erlandson Kristine M, McKhann Ashley, Kitch Douglas W, Palella Frank J, Ellis Ronald J, Ances Beau M, Zanni Markella V, Diggs Marissa R, Chu Sarah M, Currier Judith S, Bloomfield Gerald S, Malvestutto Carlos D, Fichtenbaum Carl J, Aberg Judith A, Koletar Susan L, Presti Rachel M, Hatlen Timothy J, Skiest Daniel J, Douglas Pamela S, Ribaudo Heather J, Grinspoon Steven K
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver- Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO. USA.
Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. USA.
AIDS. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004267.
Effects of statins on neurocognitive function remain poorly understood, with some studies suggesting harm and others suggesting benefit. Limited observational data among people with HIV (PWH) is biased by indication for statin prescription. We sought to assess statin effects on neurocognitive function among PWH.
We leveraged data from participants co-enrolled in REPRIEVE (randomized trial of pitavastatin vs placebo among PWH with low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk) and HAILO (observational study involving repeated neurocognitive measures).
Participants with ≥1 measure of neurocognitive function before and after REPRIEVE randomization were included. Neurocognitive function was determined by NPZ-4, the average of the Z scores from: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised, Trailmaking A and B, and Digit Symbol Test every 48 weeks. Trajectories before and after randomization were analyzed with generalized estimating equation models.
Of 181 co-enrolled participants (pitavastatin 88, placebo 93), changes over median 2.3 years on overall and individual neurocognitive scores were small, not meeting a clinically relevant threshold of >0.5/year, and similar between arms. Although subgroup analyses were limited by a small sample size, we observed trends towards improved Trailmaking A in participants with baseline impairment who were randomized to pitavastatin vs placebo and towards worsened NPZ-4 in females randomized to pitavastatin vs placebo that similarly did not reach threshold for clinical relevance. Other subgroup effects were minimal and not statistically or clinically significant.
We found no evidence of a detrimental effect of pitavastatin use on a limited battery of neurocognitive assessments among PWH, even among PWH with baseline neurocognitive impairment.
他汀类药物对神经认知功能的影响仍知之甚少,一些研究表明有害,而另一些研究则表明有益。艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中有限的观察性数据因他汀类药物处方指征而存在偏差。我们试图评估他汀类药物对PWH神经认知功能的影响。
我们利用了同时参与REPRIEVE(低至中度心血管风险的PWH中匹伐他汀与安慰剂的随机试验)和HAILO(涉及重复神经认知测量的观察性研究)的参与者的数据。
纳入在REPRIEVE随机分组前后有≥1次神经认知功能测量的参与者。神经认知功能由NPZ-4确定,即每48周来自以下测试的Z分数的平均值:修订版霍普金斯言语学习测试、连线测验A和B以及数字符号测试。使用广义估计方程模型分析随机分组前后的轨迹。
在181名共同参与的参与者中(匹伐他汀组88名,安慰剂组93名),在中位2.3年期间,总体和个体神经认知评分的变化很小,未达到>0.5/年的临床相关阈值,两组之间相似。尽管亚组分析因样本量小而受到限制,但我们观察到,基线有损伤且被随机分配到匹伐他汀组与安慰剂组的参与者中,连线测验A有改善的趋势;而随机分配到匹伐他汀组与安慰剂组的女性中,NPZ-4有恶化的趋势,同样未达到临床相关性阈值。其他亚组效应极小,无统计学或临床意义。
我们没有发现证据表明使用匹伐他汀对PWH有限的一系列神经认知评估有不利影响,即使在基线有神经认知损伤的PWH中也是如此。