Yu Xiaoli, Wang Yixuan, Wang Mingli, Gu Huikuan, Yang Xin, Hu Jiang
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251351535. doi: 10.1177/15330338251351535. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
IntroductionTo investigate the efficacy of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model in optimizing dose distribution, and identify the inter-institutional variation in radiotherapy of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC).MethodsA total of 70 rNPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were recruited to build a KBP model. Following model refinement, 36 patients were retrospectively enrolled for dosimetric comparison between manually optimized and KBP-generated plans. Ten experienced physicists from six different institutions were engaged to independently design manual plan for a representative case, to assess inter-institutional variations, and differences between KBP and manual plans.ResultsThe refined KBP model provided significant reduced dose in brainstem D (the dose received by the "hottest"1 cm volume, 41.14 ± 8.51 Gy vs 38.48 ± 8.60 Gy, < 0.001) and spinal cord D (17.48 ± 9.38Gy vs 12.23 ± 6.56Gy, < 0.001). In addition, The mean dose (D of brainstem, spinal cord, mandible, parotid, temporomandibular joint and inner ear were statistically decreased ( < 0.05). In validation cohort, KBP model eliminated the hotspot (0.57 ± 0.01% vs 0.00 ± 0.00%, < 0.001), improved target homogeneity (HI: 0.06 ± 0.00 vs 0.08 ± 0.00, < 0.001), and performed superior to the manual plans in sparing organs. While all institutions achieved comparable target coverage, manual plans exhibited substantial variability in sparing brainstem. KBP implementation reduced inter-institutional dose disparities for brainstem (46.30 ± 10.08 Gy vs 41.80 ± 5.80 Gy, = 0.041) and spinal cord (26.08 ± 7.06 Gy vs 18.19 ± 1.98 Gy, = 0.002). Additionally, planning efficiency increased by 48.7% (39 vs 76 min).ConclusionsThis KBP framework optimized rNPC reirradiation from three dimensions: 1) Enhanced OARs' protection; 2) Improved target homogeneity; 3) Improved the multi-institutional consistency and efficiency of planning. These advancements established a clinically actionable paradigm for precision reirradiation.
引言
探讨基于知识的计划(KBP)模型在优化剂量分布方面的疗效,并确定复发性鼻咽癌(rNPC)放射治疗中的机构间差异。
方法
共招募70例接受调强放射治疗(IMRT)的rNPC患者以建立KBP模型。模型优化后,回顾性纳入36例患者,对手动优化计划和KBP生成计划进行剂量学比较。来自六个不同机构的十名经验丰富的物理师参与为一个代表性病例独立设计手动计划,以评估机构间差异以及KBP计划与手动计划之间的差异。
结果
优化后的KBP模型使脑干D(“最热”1 cm体积所接受的剂量,41.14±8.51 Gy对38.48±8.60 Gy,<0.001)和脊髓D(17.48±9.38 Gy对12.23±6.56 Gy,<0.001)显著降低。此外,脑干、脊髓、下颌骨、腮腺、颞下颌关节和内耳的平均剂量(D)在统计学上降低(<0.05)。在验证队列中,KBP模型消除了热点(0.57±0.01%对0.00±0.00%,<0.001),改善了靶区均匀性(HI:0.06±0.00对0.08±0.00,<0.001),并且在保护器官方面表现优于手动计划。虽然所有机构实现了相当的靶区覆盖,但手动计划在保护脑干方面表现出很大差异。实施KBP减少了脑干(46.30±10.08 Gy对41.80±5.80 Gy,P = 0.041)和脊髓(26.08±7.06 Gy对18.19±1.98 Gy,P = 0.002)的机构间剂量差异。此外,计划效率提高了48.7%(39对76分钟)。
结论
该KBP框架从三个维度优化了rNPC再程放疗:1)增强了对危及器官的保护;2)改善了靶区均匀性;3)提高了多机构计划的一致性和效率。这些进展建立了一种临床可行的精确再程放疗模式。