• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在商业肉牛屠宰厂中使用机械臀部推送器的情况。

Assessing the use of a mechanical rump pusher in a commercial cattle slaughter plant.

作者信息

Wigham Eleanor, French Megan

机构信息

School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 11;34:e35. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10011. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/awf.2025.10011
PMID:40529165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12171778/
Abstract

Commercial cattle slaughter operations have shown an increasing trend towards automation, with the aim being to improve animal welfare, product quality and efficiency. Several cattle slaughter plants have introduced mechanical rump pushers (RP) prior to the entrance of the stun box to reduce human-animal interaction and facilitate a smoother transition from the raceway to stun box. Presently, there are no data regarding the use of RPs in commercial slaughter environments operating at 40 cattle per hour. Therefore, this study observed normal operations at a UK slaughter plant, which has an RP installed, and assessed the level of coercion required to enter the RP, the use of the RP, cattle behaviour inside the RP and carcase bruising. The RP was used on 267 of the 815 cattle observed (32.8%) and was more likely to be used on dairy cattle and those who received a higher coercion score when entering the RP. Overall, 60 cattle (7.4%) required the highest coercion score and four (0.49%) required the use of the electric goad. Inside the RP, eleven animals slipped (1.8%) and ten vocalised (1.6%) although no incidences were directly associated with RP use. However, increased time restrained in the RP was significantly associated with more gate slams into the RP entrance gate. The use of the RP was not significantly associated with carcase bruising. These results are encouraging, and although it cannot be concluded that the presence of an RP improves cattle welfare at slaughter, use of automation within cattle slaughter facilities warrants further investigation.

摘要

商业性肉牛屠宰作业呈现出日益增长的自动化趋势,目的是改善动物福利、产品质量和效率。几家肉牛屠宰厂在电击箱入口前引入了机械臀部推进器(RP),以减少人与动物的互动,并促进从跑道到电击箱的更平稳过渡。目前,尚无关于每小时屠宰40头牛的商业屠宰环境中使用RP的数据。因此,本研究观察了英国一家安装了RP的屠宰厂的正常作业情况,并评估了进入RP所需的强制程度、RP的使用情况、牛在RP内的行为以及胴体瘀伤情况。在观察的815头牛中,有267头(32.8%)使用了RP,并且更有可能用于奶牛以及那些进入RP时强制得分较高的牛。总体而言,60头牛(7.4%)需要最高的强制得分,4头牛(0.49%)需要使用电刺激棒。在RP内,有11头牛滑倒(1.8%),10头牛发出叫声(1.6%),尽管没有任何事件与RP的使用直接相关。然而,在RP内被限制的时间增加与更多次撞击RP入口门显著相关。RP的使用与胴体瘀伤没有显著关联。这些结果令人鼓舞,虽然不能得出RP的存在能改善屠宰时牛的福利这一结论,但在肉牛屠宰设施中使用自动化值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/7b1211c80a64/S0962728625100110_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/1dc2f04705f4/S0962728625100110_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/42652b22b29c/S0962728625100110_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/59b20d5334f4/S0962728625100110_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/5513ff532e1e/S0962728625100110_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/c776b18bb533/S0962728625100110_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/7b1211c80a64/S0962728625100110_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/1dc2f04705f4/S0962728625100110_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/42652b22b29c/S0962728625100110_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/59b20d5334f4/S0962728625100110_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/5513ff532e1e/S0962728625100110_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/c776b18bb533/S0962728625100110_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4e3/12171778/7b1211c80a64/S0962728625100110_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the use of a mechanical rump pusher in a commercial cattle slaughter plant.评估在商业肉牛屠宰厂中使用机械臀部推送器的情况。
Anim Welf. 2025 Jun 11;34:e35. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10011. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
5
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的新一代抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3.
6
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
7
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
8
Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.适用于女性和男性中重度尿失禁和/或大便失禁的吸收性产品。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD007408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007408.
9
"We're all in it together": uniting a diverse range of professionals and people with lived experience within the development of a complex, theory-based paediatric speech and language therapy intervention.“我们同舟共济”:在一项基于理论的复杂儿科言语和语言治疗干预措施的开发过程中,团结各类专业人员以及有实际经验的人士。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00738-8.
10
Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.用于中风康复的虚拟现实技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub5.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of certain risk factors on presence and severity of carcass bruising in cattle: A study in Turkey.某些风险因素对牛胴体瘀伤的存在和严重程度的影响:土耳其的一项研究。
Meat Sci. 2023 Aug;202:109199. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109199. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
Robot Technology for Pork and Beef Meat Slaughtering Process: A Review.用于猪肉和牛肉屠宰过程的机器人技术:综述
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;13(4):651. doi: 10.3390/ani13040651.
3
Cattle and Pigs Are Easy to Move and Handle Will Have Less Preslaughter Stress.牛和猪易于移动和处理,屠宰前压力较小。
Foods. 2021 Oct 26;10(11):2583. doi: 10.3390/foods10112583.
4
Association between animal welfare indicators and microbiological quality of beef carcasses, including spp., from a slaughterhouse in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔一家屠宰场中动物福利指标与牛肉胴体微生物质量之间的关联,包括[具体物种]。
Vet World. 2021 Apr;14(4):918-925. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.918-925. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
5
An observational field study on the effects of changes in shadow contrasts and noise on cattle movement in a small abattoir.在一个小型屠宰场中,观察到阴影对比度和噪声变化对牛只运动的影响的实地研究。
Meat Sci. 2021 Sep;179:108539. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108539. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Researching Human-Cattle Interaction on Rangelands: Challenges and Potential Solutions.研究牧场中人与牛的互动:挑战与潜在解决方案。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;11(3):725. doi: 10.3390/ani11030725.
7
Pre-slaughter factors linked to variation in responses to carbon dioxide gas stunning in pig abattoirs.宰前因素与猪屠宰场二氧化碳气体致昏反应的变化有关。
Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100134. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100134. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
Welfare of cattle at slaughter.屠宰时牛的福利。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 3;18(11):e06275. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6275. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
From unloading to trimming: studying bruising in individual slaughter cattle.从卸载到修整:研究个体屠宰牛的瘀伤情况
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Sep 8;4(3):txaa165. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa165. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Assessment of risk factors contributing to carcass bruising in fed cattle at commercial slaughter facilities.商业屠宰场育肥牛胴体瘀伤风险因素评估
Transl Anim Sci. 2017 Dec 1;1(4):489-497. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0055. eCollection 2017 Dec.