Kadi Kamil, El-Zahran Tharwat, Badr Mario, Mdaihly Mohammad, Ahmad Nesrine, Berri Atika, Bauer Michelle E E, Al-Hajj Samar
Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Emergency, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;13:1585250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585250. eCollection 2025.
Snakebites and scorpion stings are significant public health issues globally, particularly in the Middle East. This qualitative study investigates the management of these incidents in Lebanon by exploring the perceptions of healthcare providers and public health experts.
Thematic analysis, guided by sociocultural theory, examined qualitative data from 17 interviews with healthcare providers, including emergency physicians, paramedics, pharmaceutical providers, and ministry workers. Transcripts were coded to identify recurring themes related to the management of snakebites and scorpion stings, focusing on availability, accessibility, inequity, healthcare access disparities, and cultural influences on treatment-seeking behavior.
The analysis revealed significant disparities in antivenom availability and accessibility, particularly in rural areas and among low socioeconomic groups. Healthcare providers often resorted to illicit channels to secure antivenom due to stock shortages, while victims sometimes relied on traditional treatment methods. The lack of standardized treatment protocols and inadequate clinician training resulted in inconsistent antivenom usage and unsafe practices. The study also highlighted insufficient documentation and reporting mechanisms and inadequate networking among stakeholders, alongside a notable knowledge gap among victims.
This study emphasizes the urgent need for targeted interventions to address systemic challenges in managing snakebites and scorpion stings in Lebanon. Collaborative efforts are essential to enhance awareness, improve antivenom access, standardize treatment protocols, and promote effective management practices.
蛇咬伤和蝎子蜇伤是全球重大的公共卫生问题,在中东地区尤为突出。本定性研究通过探讨医疗服务提供者和公共卫生专家的看法,调查了黎巴嫩对这些事件的管理情况。
在社会文化理论的指导下,采用主题分析法,对来自17名医疗服务提供者的定性数据进行了分析,这些提供者包括急诊医生、护理人员、药剂供应商和卫生部工作人员。对访谈记录进行编码,以识别与蛇咬伤和蝎子蜇伤管理相关的反复出现的主题,重点关注抗蛇毒血清的可获得性、可及性、不公平性、医疗服务获取差距以及文化对寻求治疗行为的影响。
分析显示,抗蛇毒血清的可获得性和可及性存在显著差异,特别是在农村地区和社会经济地位较低的群体中。由于库存短缺,医疗服务提供者常常求助于非法渠道来获取抗蛇毒血清,而受害者有时则依赖传统治疗方法。缺乏标准化的治疗方案以及临床医生培训不足,导致抗蛇毒血清使用不一致和操作不安全。该研究还强调了记录和报告机制不足、利益相关者之间的网络联系不够,以及受害者之间存在明显的知识差距。
本研究强调迫切需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以应对黎巴嫩在蛇咬伤和蝎子蜇伤管理方面的系统性挑战。合作努力对于提高认识、改善抗蛇毒血清的可及性、规范治疗方案以及推广有效的管理做法至关重要。