Senyard Emma-Leigh, Rowe Arlen, Krishnamoorthy Govind, March Sonja
Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.
School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
J Clin Psychol. 2025 Oct;81(10):930-939. doi: 10.1002/jclp.70007. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
Self-Help Internet Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) interventions are highly efficacious and overcome numerous barriers adolescents experience when accessing face-to-face interventions, including stigma, privacy, lengthy wait lists and cost. Despite this, adolescents struggle to engage in Self-Help iCBT, which is problematic given that there is a relationship between higher engagement and better treatment outcomes. The reasons for poor engagement among adolescents are unclear. Using the iCBT program, BRAVE Self-Help as an example, this study explored (1) the barriers to engagement directly from the adolescent's perspective and, (2) their viewpoints on enhancing engagement in iCBT.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 adolescents aged 12-17 years (M = 14.36, SD = 2.12) who had participated in BRAVE Self-Help in the previous 12 months. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to analyse data.
Stigma, program factors (program design, content and length) and environmental factors (competing priorities and distractions), were identified as adolescent barriers to engagement. With respect to strategies to enhance engagement, adolescents identified (1) specific program factors (positive reinforcement and personalisation), and (2) support factors (reminders and optional support).
Codesign methods with adolescents at both the design and implementation stages of iCBT programs is imperative for engagement.
自助式互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)干预措施非常有效,克服了青少年在接受面对面干预时遇到的众多障碍,包括耻辱感、隐私问题、漫长的等候名单和费用。尽管如此,青少年仍难以参与自助式iCBT,鉴于更高的参与度与更好的治疗效果之间存在关联,这是个问题。青少年参与度低的原因尚不清楚。本研究以iCBT项目“勇敢自助”为例,探讨了(1)直接从青少年角度出发的参与障碍,以及(2)他们对提高iCBT参与度的看法。
对14名年龄在12至17岁(M = 14.36,SD = 2.12)且在过去12个月内参与过“勇敢自助”的青少年进行了半结构化访谈。采用反思性主题分析来分析数据。
耻辱感、项目因素(项目设计、内容和时长)以及环境因素(相互竞争的优先事项和干扰因素)被确定为青少年参与的障碍。关于提高参与度的策略,青少年确定了(1)特定的项目因素(积极强化和个性化),以及(2)支持因素(提醒和可选支持)。
在iCBT项目的设计和实施阶段与青少年共同设计方法对于提高参与度至关重要。