• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字心理健康干预措施中用户参与的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.

机构信息

University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. doi: 10.2196/24387.

DOI:10.2196/24387
PMID:33759801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user's uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included.

RESULTS

A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one's own health.

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.

摘要

背景

数字心理健康干预(DMHIs)通过移动应用等技术提供心理健康支持,可以增加获得心理健康支持的机会,许多研究已经证明它们在改善症状方面的有效性。然而,用户参与度存在差异,涉及到用户对这些干预措施的接受程度和持续互动。

目的

本系统评价旨在确定影响用户参与 DMHI 的常见障碍和促进因素。

方法

在 SCOPUS、PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入了报告定性和/或定量数据的实证研究。

结果

共有 208 篇文章符合纳入标准。纳入的文章采用了多种方法,包括访谈、调查、焦点小组、研讨会、实地研究和用户评论分析。提取用于编码的因素与最终用户、干预措施提供的计划或内容以及技术和实施环境有关。常见的障碍包括严重的心理健康问题,这阻碍了参与度、技术问题和缺乏个性化。常见的促进因素包括干预措施促进的社交联系、对健康的深入了解以及对自己健康的控制感。

结论

尽管先前的研究表明,DMHIs 在支持心理健康方面可能是有用的,但情境因素是用户是否实际参与这些干预措施的重要决定因素。本评价中确定的因素可以在评估 DMHIs 时提供指导,以帮助解释和理解用户参与度,并为新的数字干预措施的设计和开发提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.数字心理健康干预措施中用户参与的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. doi: 10.2196/24387.
2
Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: Systematic Qualitative Grounded Theory Review.心脏康复和自我管理中技术应用的障碍和促进因素:系统定性扎根理论综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e18025. doi: 10.2196/18025.
3
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
4
User engagement in clinical trials of digital mental health interventions: a systematic review.用户参与数字心理健康干预临床试验:系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 24;24(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02308-0.
5
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Alleviating Depression and Anxiety During Psychotherapy Waiting Lists: Systematic Review.数字心理健康干预在心理治疗等候名单中缓解抑郁和焦虑的系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 10;11:e56650. doi: 10.2196/56650.
6
Outcomes of Best-Practice Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions for Youth and Young Adults with Emerging Symptoms: Part II. A Systematic Review of User Experience Outcomes.最佳实践引导的数字心理健康干预措施对出现症状的青年和年轻成年人的结果:第二部分。用户体验结果的系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):476-508. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00468-5. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.试验之外:对抑郁症、情绪低落或焦虑症数字自助干预措施的现实世界采用情况和参与度的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275.
8
Design of Digital Mental Health Platforms for Family Member Cocompletion: Scoping Review.数字心理健康平台家庭成员共完成设计:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 3;26:e49431. doi: 10.2196/49431.
9
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
10
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.让儿童和青少年参与数字心理健康干预:对提供方式、促进因素和障碍的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317. doi: 10.2196/16317.

引用本文的文献

1
A personalized mHealth intervention for the universal prevention of perinatal mental disorders in routine maternal care (e-Perinatal): A protocol study for a hybrid feasibility pilot trial.一项用于常规孕产妇护理中围产期精神障碍普遍预防的个性化移动健康干预措施(电子围产期):一项混合可行性试点试验的方案研究
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jun 27;5:170. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.20386.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Prediction of treatment outcome in patients receiving internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depressive and anxiety symptoms: a machine learning analysis of data from a healthcare-embedded longitudinal study.接受互联网认知行为疗法治疗抑郁和焦虑症状患者的治疗结果预测:一项基于医疗保健嵌入式纵向研究数据的机器学习分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 3;15(9):e097651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097651.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Coached Mobile App Platform for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.教练式移动应用平台治疗初级保健患者的抑郁和焦虑:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):906-914. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1011.
2
Examining the Reach of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Anxiety.审视智能手机应用程序在抑郁症和焦虑症方面的影响范围。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;177(5):464-465. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19090905.
3
An mHealth approach to extend a brief intervention for adolescent alcohol use and suicidal behavior: Qualitative analyses of adolescent and parent feedback.
Smartphone Apps and Wearables for Health Parameters in Young Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Study.用于青年期健康参数的智能手机应用程序和可穿戴设备:横断面研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Sep 3;12:e64629. doi: 10.2196/64629.
4
Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.设计映射:共同设计循证数字心理健康项目的概念框架。
Health Expect. 2025 Oct;28(5):e70385. doi: 10.1111/hex.70385.
5
Pilot Study of Factors Influencing Engagement with an mHealth Intervention Among Teens with Eating Disorder Symptoms.对有饮食失调症状青少年参与移动健康干预的影响因素的初步研究。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2025 Jun;10:424-434. doi: 10.1007/s41347-024-00444-4. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Exploring the Implementation of Gamification as a Treatment Modality for Adults with Depression in Malaysia.探索游戏化作为马来西亚成年抑郁症患者治疗方式的实施情况。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 1;61(8):1404. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081404.
7
A Gamified Digital Mental Health Intervention Across Six Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of a Large-Scale Implementation.一项针对撒哈拉以南非洲六个国家的游戏化数字心理健康干预措施:大规模实施的横断面评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 15;22(8):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081281.
8
PeerOnCall: Evaluating Implementation of App-Based Peer Support in Canadian Public Safety Organizations.同行随叫随到:评估加拿大公共安全组织中基于应用程序的同伴支持的实施情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 13;22(8):1269. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081269.
9
User Character Strengths and Engagement Prediction on a Digital Mental Health Platform for Young People: Longitudinal Observational Study.青少年数字心理健康平台上的用户性格优势与参与度预测:纵向观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 25;27:e73793. doi: 10.2196/73793.
10
Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring in First Episode Psychosis: Mixed-Methods Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.首发精神病中基于智能手机的自我监测:参与障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 26;27:e71989. doi: 10.2196/71989.
一种通过移动健康手段扩展针对青少年饮酒和自杀行为的简短干预措施:对青少年及家长反馈的定性分析
J Technol Hum Serv. 2019;37(4):255-285. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2018.1561347. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
GET.HAPPY2 - User perspectives on an internet-based self-management positive psychology intervention among persons with and without depression: Results from a retrospective survey.GET.HAPPY2 - 基于互联网的自我管理积极心理学干预在抑郁患者和非抑郁患者中的用户观点:回顾性调查结果。
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;76(6):1030-1046. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22886. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Determinant Factors of Public Acceptance of Stress Management Apps: Survey Study.公众对压力管理应用程序接受度的决定因素:调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 7;6(11):e15373. doi: 10.2196/15373.
6
Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs.未引导的电子心理健康干预措施的使用中是否存在影响用户参与度的试验偏倚?对相同程序的已发表报告和实际使用情况进行系统比较。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1020-1033. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz147.
7
Characteristics and Usage Patterns Among 12,151 Paid Subscribers of the Calm Meditation App: Cross-Sectional Survey.12151 位付费用户使用 Calm 冥想应用程序的特点和使用模式:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 3;7(11):e15648. doi: 10.2196/15648.
8
Developing a Hypothetical Implementation Framework of Expectations for Monitoring Early Signs of Psychosis Relapse Using a Mobile App: Qualitative Study.使用移动应用程序制定监测精神病复发早期迹象预期的假设实施框架:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 24;21(10):e14366. doi: 10.2196/14366.
9
Young People's Response to Six Smartphone Apps for Anxiety and Depression: Focus Group Study.年轻人对六款治疗焦虑和抑郁的智能手机应用程序的反应:焦点小组研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Oct 2;6(10):e14385. doi: 10.2196/14385.
10
Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems.利益相关者对数字心理健康干预证据的看法:对认证系统的影响。
Digit Health. 2019 Sep 19;5:2055207619878069. doi: 10.1177/2055207619878069. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.