文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

数字心理健康干预措施中用户参与的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.

机构信息

University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. doi: 10.2196/24387.


DOI:10.2196/24387
PMID:33759801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user's uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included. RESULTS: A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one's own health. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.

摘要

背景:数字心理健康干预(DMHIs)通过移动应用等技术提供心理健康支持,可以增加获得心理健康支持的机会,许多研究已经证明它们在改善症状方面的有效性。然而,用户参与度存在差异,涉及到用户对这些干预措施的接受程度和持续互动。

目的:本系统评价旨在确定影响用户参与 DMHI 的常见障碍和促进因素。

方法:在 SCOPUS、PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入了报告定性和/或定量数据的实证研究。

结果:共有 208 篇文章符合纳入标准。纳入的文章采用了多种方法,包括访谈、调查、焦点小组、研讨会、实地研究和用户评论分析。提取用于编码的因素与最终用户、干预措施提供的计划或内容以及技术和实施环境有关。常见的障碍包括严重的心理健康问题,这阻碍了参与度、技术问题和缺乏个性化。常见的促进因素包括干预措施促进的社交联系、对健康的深入了解以及对自己健康的控制感。

结论:尽管先前的研究表明,DMHIs 在支持心理健康方面可能是有用的,但情境因素是用户是否实际参与这些干预措施的重要决定因素。本评价中确定的因素可以在评估 DMHIs 时提供指导,以帮助解释和理解用户参与度,并为新的数字干预措施的设计和开发提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/343d/8074985/474a5979a78e/jmir_v23i3e24387_fig1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-3-24

[2]
Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: Systematic Qualitative Grounded Theory Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-11-11

[3]
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-5-25

[4]
User engagement in clinical trials of digital mental health interventions: a systematic review.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024-8-24

[5]
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Alleviating Depression and Anxiety During Psychotherapy Waiting Lists: Systematic Review.

JMIR Ment Health. 2024-9-10

[6]
Outcomes of Best-Practice Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions for Youth and Young Adults with Emerging Symptoms: Part II. A Systematic Review of User Experience Outcomes.

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024-6

[7]
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-6-6

[8]
Design of Digital Mental Health Platforms for Family Member Cocompletion: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-7-3

[9]
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-2-6

[10]
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-6-23

引用本文的文献

[1]
A personalized mHealth intervention for the universal prevention of perinatal mental disorders in routine maternal care (e-Perinatal): A protocol study for a hybrid feasibility pilot trial.

Open Res Eur. 2025-6-27

[2]
Prediction of treatment outcome in patients receiving internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depressive and anxiety symptoms: a machine learning analysis of data from a healthcare-embedded longitudinal study.

BMJ Open. 2025-9-3

[3]
Smartphone Apps and Wearables for Health Parameters in Young Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025-9-3

[4]
Design Mapping: A Conceptual Framework for Co-Designing Evidence-Based Digital Mental Health Programs.

Health Expect. 2025-10

[5]
Pilot Study of Factors Influencing Engagement with an mHealth Intervention Among Teens with Eating Disorder Symptoms.

J Technol Behav Sci. 2025-6

[6]
Exploring the Implementation of Gamification as a Treatment Modality for Adults with Depression in Malaysia.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-8-1

[7]
A Gamified Digital Mental Health Intervention Across Six Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of a Large-Scale Implementation.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025-8-15

[8]
PeerOnCall: Evaluating Implementation of App-Based Peer Support in Canadian Public Safety Organizations.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025-8-13

[9]
User Character Strengths and Engagement Prediction on a Digital Mental Health Platform for Young People: Longitudinal Observational Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-25

[10]
Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring in First Episode Psychosis: Mixed-Methods Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-26

本文引用的文献

[1]
Coached Mobile App Platform for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020-9-1

[2]
Examining the Reach of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Anxiety.

Am J Psychiatry. 2020-5-1

[3]
An mHealth approach to extend a brief intervention for adolescent alcohol use and suicidal behavior: Qualitative analyses of adolescent and parent feedback.

J Technol Hum Serv. 2019

[4]
GET.HAPPY2 - User perspectives on an internet-based self-management positive psychology intervention among persons with and without depression: Results from a retrospective survey.

J Clin Psychol. 2020-6

[5]
Determinant Factors of Public Acceptance of Stress Management Apps: Survey Study.

JMIR Ment Health. 2019-11-7

[6]
Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs.

Transl Behav Med. 2019-11-25

[7]
Characteristics and Usage Patterns Among 12,151 Paid Subscribers of the Calm Meditation App: Cross-Sectional Survey.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-11-3

[8]
Developing a Hypothetical Implementation Framework of Expectations for Monitoring Early Signs of Psychosis Relapse Using a Mobile App: Qualitative Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-10-24

[9]
Young People's Response to Six Smartphone Apps for Anxiety and Depression: Focus Group Study.

JMIR Ment Health. 2019-10-2

[10]
Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems.

Digit Health. 2019-9-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索