Suppr超能文献

膝关节骨关节炎不同治疗方案的临床疗效:基于随机临床试验的网状Meta分析

Clinical efficacy of different therapeutic options for knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Chen Xiao, Fan Yuanhe, Tu Hongliang, Luo Yuan

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, the First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, China.

Department of Rehabilitation, the First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0324864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324864. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the clinical efficacy of various therapeutic options in treating patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 10th, 2023, identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of therapeutic options on KOA. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, data collection and organization, and quality assessment. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis and graphical representation using Stata 17.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 139 RCTs encompassing 9644 KOA patients and involving 12 therapeutic options were included. These interventions were low level laser therapy (LLLT), high intensity laser therapy (HILT), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), interferential current (IFC), short wave diathermy, ultrasound, lateral wedged insole, knee brace, exercise, hydrotherapy, kinesio taping (KT) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Regarding the WOMAC pain score, knee brace was determined to be the most likely to yield the best results, followed by exercise and HILT, ultrasound was worst intervention. In terms of WOMAC function score, knee brace emerged as the technique with the highest likelihood of being optimal, followed in sequence by hydrotherapy and ESWT, ultrasound was worst intervention. Knee brace ranked highest in effectiveness concerning the WOMAC stiffness score, followed by exercise and hydrotherapy. For the total WOMAC score, hydrotherapy demonstrated the highest probability of being the best technique, followed by exercise and HILT, short wave diathermy was worst intervention. In addressing VAS-rest, hydrotherapy exhibited the greatest likelihood of being the optimum technique, followed by HILT and LLLT. In terms of VAS-activity, knee brace had the highest probability of being the best technique, followed by LLLT and exercise, ultrasound was worst intervention. Overall, based on the results obtained from the SUCRA for all outcomes, knee brace had the highest probability of being the best technique, followed by hydrotherapy and exercise.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that knee brace may be the most recommended therapeutic option for the knee osteoarthritis, followed by hydrotherapy and exercise.

摘要

目的

评估和比较各种治疗方案治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的临床疗效。

方法

我们对PubMed、Embase、OVID、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库从创建至2023年12月10日进行了全面检索,识别研究治疗方案对KOA影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选、数据提取、数据收集与整理以及质量评估。使用Stata 17.0软件对获得的数据进行统计分析和图形展示。

结果

共纳入139项RCT,涉及9644例KOA患者,包含12种治疗方案。这些干预措施为低强度激光疗法(LLLT)、高强度激光疗法(HILT)、经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、干扰电流(IFC)、短波透热疗法、超声、外侧楔形鞋垫、膝关节支具、运动、水疗(水疗法)、肌内效贴布(KT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)。关于WOMAC疼痛评分,膝关节支具被确定为最有可能产生最佳效果的方案,其次是运动和HILT,超声是最差的干预措施。就WOMAC功能评分而言,膝关节支具是最有可能达到最佳效果的技术,其次依次是水疗和ESWT,超声是最差的干预措施。膝关节支具在WOMAC僵硬评分的有效性方面排名最高,其次是运动和水疗。对于WOMAC总分,水疗显示出成为最佳技术的可能性最高,其次是运动和HILT,短波透热疗法是最差的干预措施。在解决静息时视觉模拟评分(VAS-rest)方面,水疗表现出成为最佳技术的可能性最大,其次是HILT和LLLT。在活动时视觉模拟评分(VAS-activity)方面,膝关节支具成为最佳技术的可能性最高,其次是LLLT和运动,超声是最差的干预措施。总体而言,根据所有结局的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)获得的结果,膝关节支具成为最佳技术的可能性最高,其次是水疗和运动。

结论

研究结果表明,膝关节支具可能是膝骨关节炎最推荐的治疗选择,其次是水疗和运动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验