Özgözen Selen, Özgözen Alaaddin Levent, Analan Pınar Doruk, İncekaş Caner
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Turgut Noyan Training and Research Center, Adana, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Turgut Noyan Training and Research Center, Adana, Turkey.
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 7;40(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04516-6.
OBJECTIVE: High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) is a relatively new form of Nd: YAG laser. The aim of the study is to investigate the additional benefits of HILT with conventional physiotherapy, related to pain and function, in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHOD: The study comprised 43 knees from 31 patients of both genders with mean age 54.6 ± 6.22 (41-64) years. 53.49% of the knees were Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grade 2, and rest were KL grade 3 KOA. Group 1 (n = 21) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hot packs (HP), exercises (EX), and HILT (Nd: yag-laser, 10 W). Group 2 (n = 22), received the same interventions but placebo HILT. All interventions were applied for 10 sessions. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Questionnaire (WOMAC), and Lequesne Algofunctional Index (LAI) were administered before, after, and at 12-week follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline VAS, WOMAC, and LAI scores of the groups were similar (p > 0.05). After treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up, both groups had significant relief for VAS, WOMAC, LAI pain (respectively, p < 0.001) and function (p < 0.012), except LAI-walking distance (p = 0.415). Post-hoc analyses and mixed-effects models showed no significant differences between groups over time for all variables. CONCLUSIONS: HILT did not provide additional short- or mid-term benefits in pain or function when added to a conventional physiotherapy and exercise program in patients with stage 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis under 65 years of age.
目的:高强度激光疗法(HILT)是一种相对较新的钕:钇铝石榴石激光形式。本研究的目的是探讨在膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者中,HILT联合传统物理治疗在疼痛和功能方面的额外益处。 方法:本研究纳入了31例患者的43个膝关节,患者年龄均值为54.6±6.22(41 - 64)岁,男女均有。53.49%的膝关节为凯尔格伦·劳伦斯(KL)2级,其余为KL 3级KOA。第1组(n = 21)接受经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、热敷(HP)、运动锻炼(EX)以及HILT(钕:钇铝石榴石激光,10W)。第2组(n = 22)接受相同的干预措施,但为安慰剂HILT。所有干预均进行10次。在治疗前、治疗后以及12周随访时进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及勒凯斯内疼痛功能指数(LAI)评估。 结果:两组的基线VAS、WOMAC和LAI评分相似(p > 0.05)。治疗后及12周随访时,两组的VAS、WOMAC、LAI疼痛(分别为p < 0.001)和功能(p < 0.012)均有显著缓解,但LAI行走距离除外(p = 0.415)。事后分析和混合效应模型显示,所有变量在两组随时间变化上无显著差异。 结论:在65岁以下的2期或3期膝关节骨关节炎患者中,将HILT添加到传统物理治疗和运动锻炼方案中,在疼痛或功能方面未提供额外短期或中期益处。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-1-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2021-12-25