Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 11;12(1):9694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13478-6.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of interferential current therapy (IFC) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalKey, and Scopus for relevant studies from their date of launch to March 22, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which IFC was applied to knee osteoarthritis patients and the outcomes of pain scores or functional scales were assessed. Ten RCTs with 493 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The IFC groups exhibited significant improvements relative to the control groups for short-term pain scores (SMD = - 0.64, 95% CI - 1.04 to - 0.25, P = 0.001), long-term pain scores (SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.60 to - 0.11, P = 0.005), and short-term Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores (SMD = - 0.39, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.02, P = 0.04). All included studies did not observe any obvious adverse effects of IFC. IFC can be recommended as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis because it improves short- and long-term pain and short-term function. However, large-scale and high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up are required to establish an appropriate standardized treatment.
我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估干扰电疗法(IFC)治疗膝骨关节炎患者的效果。我们从各数据库建库日期至 2022 年 3 月 22 日检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、ClinicalKey 和 Scopus 中相关研究,纳入了将 IFC 应用于膝骨关节炎患者且评估疼痛评分或功能量表结局的随机对照试验(RCT)。10 项 RCT(共 493 例患者)符合纳入标准,其中 9 项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析。IFC 组与对照组相比,短期疼痛评分(SMD=-0.64,95%CI-1.04 至-0.25,P=0.001)、长期疼痛评分(SMD=-0.36,95%CI-0.60 至-0.11,P=0.005)和短期 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数评分(SMD=-0.39,95%CI-0.77 至-0.02,P=0.04)均有显著改善。所有纳入研究均未观察到 IFC 的明显不良反应。IFC 可作为膝骨关节炎的一种治疗方法,因为它可改善短期和长期疼痛和短期功能。但是,需要开展更大规模和更高质量、随访时间更长的 RCT,以建立适当的标准化治疗。