• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健组织变革过程中必须考虑的主题:批判性分析综述。

The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.

作者信息

Alsaqqa Hatem H

机构信息

Al-Quds University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Palestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza, Palestine.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 14;18:3433-3446. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S514080. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S514080
PMID:40534645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12176066/
Abstract

This review is intended to scrutinize different articles' types and determine a suitable process, model or framework for successful change in healthcare organizations. An integrative review of the literature was conducted. The search strategy began with three electronic databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and PubMed). Considering the inclusion criteria, published articles that examined the change process within the healthcare organizations in the timeframe between 2000 and 2023 were chosen. Results extraction and analysis were completed on all the included articles. The final sample for this review comprised 19 studies. Based on common meanings and vital issues, 8 main themes contributing to change in healthcare organizations were integrated and grouped into four main categories (process dimensions), two adjunct factors (strategic dimensions) and one mediating tool and a result category. The four main categories are readiness to change, team-building, tangible and intangible variables' characteristics and the two adjunct factors are the metaphor design and time perspective. In addition to technology as a mediating role for change and the scale of the change as a resulted outcome. In general, collections that emerged in this study could be useful for framing initiatives to arouse organizational change in healthcare. However, little is known about the relative significance of each acknowledged factor within the change process in healthcare organizations. Various methodological research is recommended for narrowing this gap. Before beginning the change process, ongoing studies should focus on the psychological features of organizational scales for healthcare contexts.

摘要

本综述旨在审视不同类型的文章,并确定医疗保健组织成功变革的合适流程、模型或框架。我们对文献进行了综合综述。搜索策略始于三个电子数据库(EBSCOhost、谷歌学术和PubMed)。根据纳入标准,选取了2000年至2023年期间研究医疗保健组织变革过程的已发表文章。对所有纳入文章完成了结果提取和分析。本综述的最终样本包括19项研究。基于共同含义和关键问题,整合了促成医疗保健组织变革的8个主要主题,并将其分为四个主要类别(流程维度)、两个辅助因素(战略维度)、一个中介工具和一个结果类别。四个主要类别是变革准备、团队建设、有形和无形变量的特征,两个辅助因素是隐喻设计和时间视角。此外,技术作为变革的中介作用以及变革的规模作为结果。总体而言,本研究中出现的汇总内容可能有助于构建激发医疗保健组织变革的举措。然而,对于医疗保健组织变革过程中每个公认因素的相对重要性知之甚少。建议进行各种方法学研究以缩小这一差距。在开始变革过程之前,正在进行的研究应关注医疗保健背景下组织规模的心理特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb7/12176066/a124e25d611f/JMDH-18-3433-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb7/12176066/eee7f57c4fc1/JMDH-18-3433-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb7/12176066/a124e25d611f/JMDH-18-3433-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb7/12176066/eee7f57c4fc1/JMDH-18-3433-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb7/12176066/a124e25d611f/JMDH-18-3433-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.医疗保健组织变革过程中必须考虑的主题:批判性分析综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 14;18:3433-3446. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S514080. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
6
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
7
Return to Running After Achilles Tendon Repair: How Do US Navy Service Members' Physical Readiness Tests Change After Undergoing an Achilles Tendon Repair?跟腱修复术后恢复跑步:美国海军现役军人接受跟腱修复术后其身体准备测试有何变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003590.
8
Caesarean myomectomy in pregnant women with uterine fibroids.患有子宫肌瘤的孕妇行剖宫产肌瘤切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD016119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016119.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.

本文引用的文献

1
Metaphors of organizations in patient involvement programs: connections and contradictions.患者参与项目中组织的隐喻:联系与矛盾。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Mar 30;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):177-94. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0292.
2
Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses.医疗机构变革成功的特征:一项针对医生、注册护士和助理护士的访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8.
3
Exploring healthcare professionals' understanding and experiences of artificial intelligence technology use in the delivery of healthcare: An integrative review.
探索医疗保健专业人员在医疗保健提供中使用人工智能技术的理解和经验:综合述评。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):1225-1236. doi: 10.1177/1460458219874641. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Measuring change attitudes in health care organizations.测量医疗保健组织中的变化态度。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 May 20;33(3):266-285. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2018-0177. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
5
Are Healthcare Organizations Ready for Change? Comment on "Development and Content Validation of a Transcultural Instrument to Assess Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation in Healthcare Organizations: The OR4KT".医疗机构是否已准备好迎接变革?评“开发和内容验证用于评估医疗机构知识转化准备情况的跨文化工具:OR4KT”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):1158-1160. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.95.
6
Agency and Change in Healthcare Organizations: Workers' Attempts to Navigate Multiple Logics in Hospice Care.医疗机构中的代理与变革:临终关怀中工人尝试驾驭多种逻辑。
J Health Soc Behav. 2019 Mar;60(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/0022146518825379. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Transforming concepts in patient safety: a progress report.转变患者安全理念:进展报告。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1019-1026. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007756. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
The use of external change agents to promote quality improvement and organizational change in healthcare organizations: a systematic review.利用外部变革推动者促进医疗机构的质量改进和组织变革:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2856-9.
9
Healthcare Systems in Comparative Perspective: Classification, Convergence, Institutions, Inequalities, and Five Missed Turns.比较视角下的医疗保健系统:分类、趋同、制度、不平等及五个失误转向
Annu Rev Sociol. 2013 Jul;39:127-146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145609. Epub 2013 May 17.
10
The Evidence-Based Metaphor.基于证据的隐喻。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1411-1412. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17219.