• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Metaphors of organizations in patient involvement programs: connections and contradictions.患者参与项目中组织的隐喻:联系与矛盾。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Mar 30;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):177-94. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0292.
2
Organizational health management through metaphor: a mission-based approach.通过隐喻进行组织健康管理:一种基于使命的方法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 May 21;32(3):374-393. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2017-0098. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Engaging to innovate: an investigation into the implications of engagement at work on innovative behaviors in healthcare organizations.参与式创新:工作参与对医疗保健组织中创新行为的影响调查。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Jun 25;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2021-0072.
4
Organizations as machines, organizations as conversations: two core metaphors and their consequences.组织即机器,组织即对话:两个核心隐喻及其后果。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S43-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d55a05.
5
'Learning Organizations': a clinician's primer.《“学习型组织”:临床医生入门指南》
Australas Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;16(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/10398560801888639.
6
Planes, straws and oysters: the use of metaphors in healthcare reform.飞机、吸管与牡蛎:医疗改革中隐喻的运用
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):117-32. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2013-0242.
7
Exploring How Generating Metaphor Via Insight Versus Analysis Affects Metaphor Quality and Learning Outcomes.探索通过洞察与分析生成隐喻如何影响隐喻质量和学习成果。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Aug;48(8):e13488. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13488.
8
Leadership transmission: a muddled metaphor?领导力传承:一个混乱的隐喻?
J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(3):246-58. doi: 10.1108/14777260710751726.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.患者参与项目中的“患者视角”是什么?隐含逻辑及与女性主义理论的相似之处。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1363459316644494. Epub 2016 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.医疗保健组织变革过程中必须考虑的主题:批判性分析综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 14;18:3433-3446. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S514080. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM): A patient-led consensus work and 'think aloud' study for a quality improvement programme.炎症性肠病(IBD)患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发:一项以患者为导向的共识工作和“出声思考”研究,用于质量改进计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):213-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.13647. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space.迈向共同生产性学习?作为实验空间的交流网络。
Front Sociol. 2019 Apr 24;4:36. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00036. eCollection 2019.
2
Selective permeability of boundaries in a knowledge brokering team.知识中介团队中边界的选择性渗透性。
Public Adm. 2018 Dec;96(4):817-836. doi: 10.1111/padm.12541. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Engaging with theory: from theoretically informed to theoretically informative improvement research.与理论接轨:从理论指导到理论丰富的改进研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):177-179. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009036. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
4
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement.参与式时代精神:医疗保健改善中共同生产和共同设计时代变革的一种解释性理论模型。
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):247-257. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Scaffolding our systems? Patients and families 'reaching in' as a source of healthcare resilience.支撑我们的系统?患者和家庭“主动参与”作为医疗恢复力的一个来源。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008216. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
'You're there because you are unprofessional': patient and public involvement as liminal knowledge spaces.“你之所以在那里是因为你不专业”:患者及公众参与作为阈限知识空间
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Mar;40(3):463-477. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12655. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
Continuing Education Meets the Learning Organization: The Challenge of a Systems Approach to Patient Safety.继续教育与学习型组织:患者安全系统方法面临的挑战。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37(4):255-261. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000177.
8
Evaluating patient and public involvement in health research: from theoretical model to practical workshop.评估患者和公众参与健康研究:从理论模型到实践研讨会。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):826-835. doi: 10.1111/hex.12486. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research.象征资本在健康研究中患者和公众参与的力量。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):836-844. doi: 10.1111/hex.12519. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
10
What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.患者参与项目中的“患者视角”是什么?隐含逻辑及与女性主义理论的相似之处。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1363459316644494. Epub 2016 Jul 24.

患者参与项目中组织的隐喻:联系与矛盾。

Metaphors of organizations in patient involvement programs: connections and contradictions.

机构信息

Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

The Wilson Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Mar 30;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):177-94. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0292.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0292
PMID:33774981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297596/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this paper, we contribute to the theorizing of patient involvement in organizational improvement by exploring concepts of "learning from patients" as mechanisms of organizational change. Using the concept of metaphor as a theoretical bridge, we analyse interview data ( = 20) from participants in patient engagement activities from two case study organizations in Ontario, Canada. Inspired by classic organizational scholars, we ask "what is the organization that it might learn from patients?"

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Patient involvement activities are used as part of quality improvement efforts in healthcare organizations worldwide. One fundamental assumption underpinning this activity is the notion that organizations must "learn from patients" in order to enact positive organizational change. Despite this emphasis on learning, there is a paucity of research that theorizes learning or connects concepts of learning to organizational change within the domain of patient involvement.

FINDINGS

Through our analysis, we interpret a range of metaphors of the organization, including organizations as (1) power and politics, (2) systems and (3) narratives. Through these metaphors, we display a range of possibilities for interpreting how organizations might learn from patients and associated implications for organizational change.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This analysis has implications for how the framing of the organization matters for concepts of learning in patient engagement activities and how misalignments might stymie engagement efforts. We argue that the concept and commitment to "learning from patients" would be enriched by further engagement with the sociology of knowledge and critical concepts from theories of organizational learning.

摘要

目的

在本文中,我们通过探讨“从患者身上学习”作为组织变革机制的概念,为患者参与组织改进的理论化做出了贡献。我们使用隐喻的概念作为理论桥梁,分析了来自加拿大安大略省两个案例研究组织中参与患者参与活动的 20 名参与者的访谈数据。受经典组织学者的启发,我们提出了“它可能从患者身上学习到的组织是什么?”的问题。

设计/方法/途径:患者参与活动被用作全球医疗保健组织质量改进努力的一部分。这种活动的一个基本假设是,为了实施积极的组织变革,组织必须“从患者身上学习”。尽管如此强调学习,但在患者参与领域,将学习理论化或将学习概念与组织变革联系起来的研究却很少。

发现

通过我们的分析,我们解释了一系列关于组织的隐喻,包括组织作为(1)权力和政治,(2)系统和(3)叙事。通过这些隐喻,我们展示了组织如何从患者身上学习以及相关的组织变革含义的多种可能性。

原创性/价值:这项分析对于患者参与活动中学习概念的组织框架以及不匹配如何阻碍参与努力的方式具有重要意义。我们认为,通过进一步参与知识社会学和组织学习理论的批判性概念,可以丰富“从患者身上学习”的概念和承诺。