Guo Xiaobei, Zhang Hui, Shi Yuequan, He Qi, Liu Anwen, Zeng Zhimin, Wang Jinghui, Wei Song, Zhang Tong, Ding Cuimin, Fang Jian, Chen Xiaoling, Van Schil Paul, Zhang Haoran, Pang Junyi, Chen Minjiang, Zhao Jing, Zhong Wei, Huo Zhen, Xu Yan, Wang Mengzhao
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 May 30;14(5):1804-1820. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-271. Epub 2025 May 27.
Current limited evidence suggests that the use of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may be effective for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and negative programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, but real-world data are relatively scarce. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the efficacy, adverse events, and prognostic factors in these patients treated with chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab.
This retrospective study analyzed the data of patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC without sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) alterations who had negative PD-L1 expression and received first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (the Pembro group) or platinum-based dual chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (the Chemo group). The efficacy outcomes and safety profiles of the two groups were compared.
The study included 246 patients (Pembro group, n=114; Chemo group, n=132). The median follow-up period was 28.3 months. The Pembro group significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with the Chemo group [9.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5-11.5 . 7.2 months, 95% CI: 5.7-8.7; hazard ratio (HR) =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87; P=0.004]. Squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) patients demonstrated substantial PFS benefit (13.8 months, 95% CI: 3.2-24.1 . 4.8 months, 95% CI: 3.4-6.2; P<0.001), while non-SCC patients showed comparable PFS (9.3 months, 95% CI: 7.6-11.0 . 8.0 months, 95% CI: 6.0-10.0; P=0.56). Overall survival (OS) favored the Pembro group (21.2 months, 95% CI: 16.0-26.4 . 20.1 months, 95% CI: 15.5-24.7; HR =0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-1.00; P=0.052). The SCC patients in the Pembro group demonstrated a significant survival benefit with a median OS that was not reached, compared to 14.2 months (95% CI: 6.3-22.1) in the chemo group (HR =0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.78; P=0.007). Grade ≥3 non-immune-related adverse events (non-irAEs) occurred more often in the Pembro group (46.8%) than the Chemo group (33.1%, P=0.03). Moreover, 45 (39.5%) patients experienced 63 irAEs, and no grade 5 or new irAEs were observed.
Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival in patients with PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC, particularly those with squamous histology.
目前有限的证据表明,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗可能对初治的转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)且程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达阴性的患者有效,但真实世界的数据相对较少。这项回顾性队列研究分析了这些接受或未接受帕博利珠单抗化疗的患者的疗效、不良事件和预后因素。
这项回顾性研究分析了不可切除、局部晚期或转移性NSCLC患者的数据,这些患者无敏感的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)或间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)或原癌基因受体酪氨酸激酶(ROS1)改变,PD-L1表达阴性,接受一线帕博利珠单抗联合化疗(帕博利珠单抗组)或含或不含贝伐单抗的铂类双药化疗(化疗组)。比较了两组的疗效结果和安全性。
该研究纳入了246例患者(帕博利珠单抗组,n = 114;化疗组,n = 132)。中位随访期为28.3个月。与化疗组相比,帕博利珠单抗组显著延长了无进展生存期(PFS)[9.5个月,95%置信区间(CI):7.5 - 11.5对7.2个月,95%CI:5.7 - 8.7;风险比(HR)= 0.64,95%CI:0.46 - 0.87;P = 0.004]。肺鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者的PFS有显著获益(13.8个月,95%CI:3.2 - 24.1对4.8个月,95%CI:3.4 - 6.2;P < 0.001),而非SCC患者的PFS相当(9.3个月,95%CI:7.6 - 11.0对8.0个月,95%CI:6.0 - 10.0;P = 0.56)。总生存期(OS)有利于帕博利珠单抗组(21.2个月,95%CI:16.