• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自制肝脏悬吊装置在三维腹腔镜下肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ段肿瘤非解剖性切除中的应用

Application of a self-made liver suspension device in 3D laparoscopic non-anatomical resection of liver segment VI and VII tumors.

作者信息

Chen Shengxiong, Jin Xiaoxu, Hao Zijia, Wang Yijun, Du Chengxu, Liu Xiaoding, Jiang Huiqing

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, PR China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, PR China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):3862-3874. doi: 10.62347/FEMB3665. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.62347/FEMB3665
PMID:40535623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12170420/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a novel self-designed liver suspension device in three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic non-anatomical (NAR) resection for tumors in hepatic segments VI and VII.

METHODS

Clinical records of 79 patients undergoing NAR resection of hepatic segments VI and VII at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (June 2016-December 2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into the Suspension Device Laparoscopic Group (SDLG), utilizing the self-designed suspension device for 3D-guided resection, and the Conventional Laparoscopic Group (CLG). Statistical analyses comprised two-sample t-tests, chi-square tests, and Log-rank tests. Perioperative outcomes including surgical time, hepatic pedicle occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, drainage tube removal time, time to ambulation, postoperative flatus recovery, and complications (pleural effusion, ascites, bile leakage, wound infection/liquefaction/effusion) were compared. Postoperative hepatic functional recovery (Child-Pugh classification) and 1-/3-year survival rates were assessed.

RESULTS

The SDLG demonstrated significantly shorter surgical time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and abbreviated hepatic pedicle clamping time compared to the CLG. Postoperative hepatic functional recovery, as assessed by Child-Pugh classification, was accelerated in the SDLG cohort, with a higher proportion achieving baseline function earlier than the CLG. Complication rates, including pleural effusion, ascites, and bile leakage, were markedly lower in the SDLG, while no significant differences were observed in hospitalization duration, ambulation initiation, or flatus recovery. Survival analysis revealed the 1-/3-year survival rate of SDLG was higher than that of CLG.

CONCLUSION

The self-designed liver suspension device enhances the safety and efficiency of 3D laparoscopic NAR resection for hepatic segment VI and VII tumors by minimizing operative trauma, reducing mechanical injury risks, and promoting postoperative hepatic functional recovery. Its application is associated with fewer procedure-related complications to conventional techniques, and increased survival rate. These advantages underscore its potential as a valuable innovation in minimally invasive liver surgery, meriting further clinical validation and integration with complementary technologies to refine surgical precision and outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估一种新型自行设计的肝脏悬吊装置在三维(3D)腹腔镜下对肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ段肿瘤进行非解剖性(NAR)切除术中的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析河北医科大学第二医院2016年6月至2021年12月期间79例行肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ段NAR切除术患者的临床资料。将患者分为悬吊装置腹腔镜组(SDLG),采用自行设计的悬吊装置进行3D引导下切除,以及传统腹腔镜组(CLG)。统计分析包括两样本t检验、卡方检验和对数秩检验。比较围手术期结果,包括手术时间、肝蒂阻断时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、引流管拔除时间、下床活动时间、术后胃肠排气恢复时间及并发症(胸腔积液、腹水、胆漏、伤口感染/液化/积液)。评估术后肝功能恢复情况(Child-Pugh分级)及1/3年生存率。

结果

与CLG相比,SDLG的手术时间明显缩短,术中出血量减少,肝蒂阻断时间缩短。根据Child-Pugh分级评估,SDLG组术后肝功能恢复加快,达到基线功能的比例高于CLG组。SDLG组的并发症发生率,包括胸腔积液、腹水和胆漏,明显较低,而在住院时间、开始下床活动或胃肠排气恢复方面未观察到显著差异。生存分析显示,SDLG组的1/3年生存率高于CLG组。

结论

自行设计的肝脏悬吊装置通过最大限度地减少手术创伤、降低机械损伤风险并促进术后肝功能恢复,提高了3D腹腔镜下对肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ段肿瘤进行NAR切除的安全性和效率。与传统技术相比,其应用相关的手术并发症更少,生存率更高。这些优势凸显了其作为微创肝脏手术中有价值创新的潜力,值得进一步的临床验证并与辅助技术相结合,以提高手术精度和改善手术效果。

相似文献

1
Application of a self-made liver suspension device in 3D laparoscopic non-anatomical resection of liver segment VI and VII tumors.自制肝脏悬吊装置在三维腹腔镜下肝Ⅵ、Ⅶ段肿瘤非解剖性切除中的应用
Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):3862-3874. doi: 10.62347/FEMB3665. eCollection 2025.
2
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery.腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞预防腹腔镜及机器人辅助妇科手术女性患者术后疼痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 3;4(4):CD015145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015145.pub2.
3
How Does Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compare to Posterior Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.对于青少年特发性脊柱侧凸,椎体前路栓系术与后路脊柱融合术相比效果如何?一项非随机临床试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003575.
4
Survival outcomes comparing minimally invasive versus open cytoreductive surgery in recurrent adult-type granulosa cell tumors.复发性成人型颗粒细胞瘤中微创与开放细胞减灭术的生存结果比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul;233(1):51.e1-51.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
5
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
6
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
7
Isolated Limb Perfusion Can Avert Amputation Indication in Initially Nonsalvageable Sarcomas of the Extremities.孤立肢体灌注可避免最初无法挽救的四肢肉瘤的截肢指征。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003584.
8
Pelvic floor muscle training with feedback or biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women.针对女性尿失禁的盆底肌训练及反馈或生物反馈训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD009252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252.pub2.
9
Hospital Volume and Social Determinants of Health Do Not Impact Outcomes in Fenestrated Visceral Segment Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients Treated at VQI Centers.医院手术量和健康的社会决定因素对在VQI中心接受治疗的患者进行开窗内脏段血管腔内主动脉修复术的预后没有影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Aug;59(6):584-593. doi: 10.1177/15385744251330017. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
10
Regional analgesia techniques for postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后疼痛的区域镇痛技术:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD014818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014818.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics, outcome, duration of hospitalization, and cycle threshold of patients with COVID-19 referred to four hospitals in Babol City: a multicenter retrospective observational study on the fourth, fifth, and sixth waves.巴博勒市 4 家医院转诊的 COVID-19 患者的特征、结局、住院时间和循环阈值:第四、五、六波的多中心回顾性观察研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 6;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08939-w.
2
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;49(4):700-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放解剖性肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 17;9:1003948. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003948. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of surgical outcomes among open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术的手术结果比较:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01797-4.
5
Effects of Gum Chewing on Recovery From Postoperative Ileus: A Randomized Clinical Trail.咀嚼口香糖对术后肠麻痹恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Oct 1;30(5):e233. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000510.
6
A commentary on "Laparoscopic Anatomical Versus Non-anatomical hepatectomy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A randomised controlled trial" (Int J Surg 2022;102:106652).对《腹腔镜解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:一项随机对照试验》(《国际外科学杂志》2022年;102:106652)的述评
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106783. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106783. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Influence of Three-Dimensional Visual Reconstruction Technology Combined with Virtual Surgical Planning of CTA Images on Precise Resection of Liver Cancer in Hepatobiliary Surgery.三维可视化重建技术联合 CTA 图像虚拟手术规划对肝胆外科肝癌精准切除的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 7;2022:4376654. doi: 10.1155/2022/4376654. eCollection 2022.
8
Operative Time and Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术时间与手术部位感染和假体周围关节感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):155-161.
9
Advances in the surgical treatment of liver cancer.肝癌的外科治疗进展。
Biosci Trends. 2022 Jul 20;16(3):178-188. doi: 10.5582/bst.2022.01245. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Laparoscopic Anatomical Versus Non-anatomical hepatectomy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jun;102:106652. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106652. Epub 2022 May 4.