• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响英国多专科虚拟病房项目实施的因素:对工作人员经验和观点的定性探索

Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Multispecialty Virtual Ward Program in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Exploration of Staff Experiences and Perspectives.

作者信息

Litchfield Ian, Lewis Richard, Delanerolle Gayathri, Melyda Melyda, Harper Lorraine

机构信息

Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Birmingham Health Partners, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e75406. doi: 10.2196/75406.

DOI:10.2196/75406
PMID:40536797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Health Service (NHS) in England is facing unprecedented demand for hospital services, with virtual wards (VW) being a central tenet of the strategy to manage these ongoing pressures on capacity. VWs combine digital and analog tools, monitoring systems, and teams of multidisciplinary care providers to support patients in their place of residence who might otherwise be cared for in a hospital. Despite virtual ward programs continuing to proliferate in the United Kingdom and across the globe, the models of care that support them are still evolving, and best practices in their design and implementation are yet to be fully established. It is therefore necessary to continue to gather evidence about the influences that shape their design and support their successful and sustained introduction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the experience of staff involved in designing, developing, and delivering VWs as part of the national program, in order to understand the factors that influence their implementation and sustainability.

METHODS

Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews with staff and senior stakeholders involved in developing, leading, and delivering the virtual ward program within one of the largest integrated care systems in England. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis, informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework.

RESULTS

We interviewed 20 participants from clinical and nonclinical roles, including service transformation leads, program leads, physiotherapists, nurses, and consultants. Using the NASSS framework, we identified several key findings: patient context was as important as clinical criteria in determining referral suitability (Condition). Stand-alone digital monitoring solutions with offline capability improved accessibility (Technology). While benefits to patient rehabilitation and hospital capacity were widely understood, concerns over the lack of evidence remained (Value proposition). Clearer messaging about the nature and benefits of VWs was needed for patients and carers, and staff described challenges with remote care and shared responsibility across settings (Adopters). Pre-existing collaborative arrangements helped but varied by specialty (Organizations). NHS targets and metrics of success were considered unrealistic (Wider system). Finally, participants recommended more coherent regional planning that involved consultation with patients (Embedding over time).

CONCLUSIONS

If the United Kingdom's VWs program is expected to move forward, it requires patients, their families, carers, and staff to receive coherent messaging of their responsibilities and benefits. Targeted training and ring-fenced time for staff would help, as would the provision of purposely designed patient-facing technologies. Finally, extended planning and funding cycles are needed to gather robust evidence and refine VWs, ensuring better integration with existing services that incorporate the needs and preferences of patients from various sociocultural backgrounds.

摘要

背景

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)正面临着前所未有的医院服务需求,虚拟病房(VW)是应对这些持续的容量压力战略的核心宗旨。虚拟病房结合了数字和模拟工具、监测系统以及多学科护理提供者团队,以支持那些原本可能在医院接受护理的居家患者。尽管虚拟病房项目在英国乃至全球不断增加,但支持它们的护理模式仍在不断发展,其设计和实施的最佳实践尚未完全确立。因此,有必要继续收集有关影响其设计并支持其成功持续引入的因素的证据。

目的

本研究旨在探索参与设计、开发和提供作为国家项目一部分的虚拟病房的工作人员的经验,以了解影响其实施和可持续性的因素。

方法

通过对参与英格兰最大的综合医疗系统之一的虚拟病房项目开发、领导和实施的工作人员及高级利益相关者进行半结构化访谈收集定性数据。使用由非采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性(NASSS)框架指导的定向内容分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

我们采访了20名来自临床和非临床岗位的参与者,包括服务转型负责人、项目负责人、物理治疗师、护士和顾问。使用NASSS框架,我们确定了几个关键发现:在确定转诊适宜性(条件)时,患者情况与临床标准同样重要。具有离线功能的独立数字监测解决方案提高了可及性(技术)。虽然患者康复和医院容量方面的益处已得到广泛理解,但对缺乏证据的担忧仍然存在(价值主张)。需要向患者和护理人员更清晰地传达虚拟病房的性质和益处,工作人员描述了远程护理和跨机构分担责任方面的挑战(采用者)。先前存在的合作安排有帮助,但因专业而异(组织)。NHS的目标和成功指标被认为不切实际(更广泛的系统)。最后,参与者建议进行更连贯的区域规划,包括与患者协商(随着时间推移进行嵌入)。

结论

如果英国的虚拟病房项目要向前推进,就需要患者、其家人、护理人员和工作人员收到关于其责任和益处的连贯信息。为工作人员提供有针对性的培训和专门安排的时间会有所帮助,提供专门设计的面向患者的技术也会如此。最后,需要延长规划和资金周期以收集有力证据并完善虚拟病房,确保更好地与纳入来自各种社会文化背景患者的需求和偏好的现有服务相结合。

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Multispecialty Virtual Ward Program in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Exploration of Staff Experiences and Perspectives.影响英国多专科虚拟病房项目实施的因素:对工作人员经验和观点的定性探索
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e75406. doi: 10.2196/75406.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
8
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
9
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding "Alert Fatigue" in Primary Care: Qualitative Systematic Review of General Practitioners Attitudes and Experiences of Clinical Alerts, Prompts, and Reminders.理解基层医疗中的“警报疲劳”:对全科医生关于临床警报、提示和提醒的态度及经历的定性系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e62763. doi: 10.2196/62763.
2
The Views and Experiences of Integrated Care System Commissioners About the Adoption and Implementation of Virtual Wards in England: Qualitative Exploration Study.英国综合护理系统专员对采用和实施虚拟病房的看法和经验:定性探索研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e56494. doi: 10.2196/56494.
3
Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients during Teleconsultation: A Scoping Review.
远程会诊期间临床医生和患者所面临的沟通挑战:一项范围综述
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):56-66. doi: 10.1055/a-2425-8626. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Drivers and Challenges in Implementing a Virtual Rehabilitation Ward: Qualitative Study.医院员工对实施虚拟康复病房的驱动力和挑战的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jun 27;7:e54774. doi: 10.2196/54774.
5
Recommendations to advance digital health equity: a systematic review of qualitative studies.推进数字健康公平性的建议:定性研究的系统评价
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jun 29;7(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01177-7.
6
No parties meeting the challenge on health in the UK.在英国,没有各方应对健康方面的挑战。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 29;403(10446):2769-2770. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01341-2.
7
Inpatient-level care at home delivered by virtual wards and hospital at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions and their components.家庭虚拟病房和家庭医院提供的住院级护理:复杂干预措施及其组成部分的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 2;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03312-3.
8
Virtual wards for people with frailty: what works, for whom, how and why-a rapid realist review.衰弱患者的虚拟病房:有效方法、适用人群、作用机制和影响因素——快速务实综述。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae039.
9
Length of stay and economic sustainability of virtual ward care in a medium-sized hospital of the UK: a retrospective longitudinal study.英国一家中型医院虚拟病房护理的住院时间和经济可持续性:一项回顾性纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e081378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081378.
10
The importance of a comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted onto a virtual ward.对入住虚拟病房的老年人进行全面老年评估的重要性。
Br J Nurs. 2023 Oct 12;32(18):882-889. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.18.882.