• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭报告结局指标(FROMs)筛查项目是慢性病管理的一个组成部分:一项范围综述。

Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs an Integral Part of Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Lambert Sylvie, Audet Li-Anne, Ould Brahim Lydia, Schaffler Jamie, Garcia Ramirez Cecilia, Frati Francesca, Sangha Sonya, Howard A Fuchsia, Lambert Leah

机构信息

Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

St. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339217. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339217. Epub 2025 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1177/10732748251339217
PMID:40537023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179453/
Abstract

Caregivers experience physical, psychological, emotional, and practical challenges resulting from their roles and responsibilities. These challenges negatively impact caregivers' health and well-being. Screening for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is now considered a cornerstone of chronic disease management to improve symptom identification and management, quality of life, and survival. Similarly, screening for family-reported outcomes (FROs) could help promote caregivers' health and well-being. Though family-reported outcome measure (FROM) screening programs have emerged, the nature and extent of their development and evaluation in the context of chronic disease remains unknown. This scoping review aimed to identify the extent to which FROM screening programs among caregivers of adults with a chronic disease have been developed and evaluated. PRISMA-ScR and the methods recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute were followed. Four electronic databases (Ovid- Medline(R), Ovid- Classic + Embase, Ovid-APA PsycInfo 1967-onwards, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) were searched iteratively to identify published literature describing FROM screening programs. Secondary search strategies and a search of grey literature were also undertaken. Data were extracted using a standardized table and analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. A total of 38 studies describing 17 unique FROM programs were evaluated. Studies were published between 1999-2024 and primarily from Australia (n = 11), the United States (n = 8), and the United Kingdom (n = 6). Caregivers included (n = 4312) were most commonly spouses of patients with cancer. Screening was primarily used to tailor interventions (rather than monitor symptoms) and focused on caregivers' needs (e.g., information, managing patient symptoms). Nurses typically responded to the screening. Most programs offered three types of follow-up: informational/educational resources, referrals to specialists or community groups, and/or real-time discussion and feedback with the interventionist. Although the FROM programs positively impacted proximal variables (e.g., preparedness), this did not translate to more distal outcomes (e.g., quality of life, anxiety). Future research on the timing of screening, caregiver engagement, and efficacious follow-up interventions is needed.

摘要

照顾者因其角色和职责而面临身体、心理、情感和实际方面的挑战。这些挑战对照顾者的健康和幸福产生负面影响。筛查患者报告的结局(PROs)现在被视为慢性病管理的基石,以改善症状识别与管理、生活质量和生存率。同样,筛查家庭报告的结局(FROs)有助于促进照顾者的健康和幸福。尽管已经出现了家庭报告结局测量(FROM)筛查项目,但在慢性病背景下其发展和评估的性质与程度仍不明确。本范围综述旨在确定在患有慢性病的成年人的照顾者中,FROM筛查项目的发展和评估程度。遵循PRISMA-ScR和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所推荐的方法。对四个电子数据库(Ovid- Medline(R)、Ovid- Classic + Embase、Ovid-APA PsycInfo 1967年起、CINAHL Plus with Full Text以及ProQuest学位论文)进行迭代搜索,以确定描述FROM筛查项目的已发表文献。还采用了二次搜索策略并搜索了灰色文献。使用标准化表格提取数据,并采用描述性统计和定性内容分析进行分析。共评估了38项描述17个独特FROM项目的研究。研究发表于1999年至2024年之间,主要来自澳大利亚(n = 11)、美国(n = 8)和英国(n = 6)。纳入的照顾者(n = 4312)最常见的是癌症患者的配偶。筛查主要用于调整干预措施(而非监测症状),并关注照顾者的需求(如信息、管理患者症状)。护士通常对筛查做出回应。大多数项目提供三种类型的随访:信息/教育资源、转介给专科医生或社区团体,和/或与干预者进行实时讨论和反馈。尽管FROM项目对近端变量(如准备情况)产生了积极影响,但这并未转化为更长远的结果(如生活质量、焦虑)。未来需要对筛查时机、照顾者参与度和有效的随访干预措施进行研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cdb/12179453/b2423bd06559/10.1177_10732748251339217-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cdb/12179453/b2423bd06559/10.1177_10732748251339217-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cdb/12179453/b2423bd06559/10.1177_10732748251339217-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs an Integral Part of Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.家庭报告结局指标(FROMs)筛查项目是慢性病管理的一个组成部分:一项范围综述。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339217. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339217. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
3
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.多方面行为干预以提高成人局部青光眼治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.
6
Influence of religion and spirituality on head and neck cancer patients and their caregivers: a protocol for a scoping review.宗教与精神信仰对头颈癌患者及其照护者的影响:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02768-5.
7
Family Experiences, Needs, and Perceptions in Home-Based Hospice Care for Patients With Terminal Cancer: Meta-Synthesis and Systematic Review.晚期癌症患者居家临终关怀中的家庭经历、需求与认知:元整合与系统评价
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 19;11:e71596. doi: 10.2196/71596.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
9
Outcomes associated with family presence at the bedside of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a scoping review.儿科重症监护病房中危重症儿童床边家属陪伴的相关结局:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Jun 1;23(6):1150-1190. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00554. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
10
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Translating Evidence-Based Self-Management Interventions Using a Stepped-Care Approach for Patients With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Design.采用逐步照护方法为癌症患者及其照顾者翻译基于证据的自我管理干预措施:一项试点序贯多重分配随机试验设计
Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70043. doi: 10.1002/pon.70043.
2
From patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to family-reported outcomes (FROs): Acceptability and perceived usefulness of routine screening in cancer care.从患者报告结局(PROs)到家庭报告结局(FROs):癌症护理中常规筛查的可接受性和感知有用性。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Oct;22(5):1056-1064. doi: 10.1017/S147895152400035X.
3
A randomized controlled trial of a distress screening, consultation, and targeted referral system for family caregivers in oncologic care.
一项针对肿瘤护理中家庭照顾者的痛苦筛查、咨询及定向转诊系统的随机对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2024 Feb;33(2):e6301. doi: 10.1002/pon.6301.
4
Family caregivers' experiences of discussing their needs with a nurse during specialised home care utilizing the carer support needs assessment tool intervention - A qualitative study.家庭照顾者在使用照顾者支持需求评估工具干预的专业家庭护理期间与护士讨论其需求的经历——一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Oct;66:102412. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102412. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Increased preparedness for caregiving among family caregivers in specialized home care by using the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention.使用“照顾者支持需求评估工具干预”增加专门家庭护理中家庭照顾者的护理准备。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Apr;22(2):236-242. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000639.
6
Experience and acceptability of a carer-focussed intervention in acute oncology settings: A qualitative study of people with advanced cancer and their carers.在急性肿瘤环境中以照顾者为中心的干预措施的经验和可接受性:一项对晚期癌症患者及其照顾者的定性研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2023 Oct;70(5):570-580. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12887. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
7
Novel mixed-method, inclusive protocol involving global key stakeholders, including carers as experts, to co-develop relevant Caregiver-Reported Outcome Domains (CRODs) in skin disease.一种新型的混合方法,包括全球主要利益相关者,包括护理人员作为专家,共同制定与皮肤疾病相关的 caregiver 报告结局领域(CRODs)的包容性方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e068893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068893.
8
Honoring What We Say We Do: Developing Real-World Tools for Routine Family Caregiver Assessment and Support in Outpatient Palliative Care.尊重我们的所言所行:在姑息治疗的门诊环境中开发用于常规家庭照护者评估和支持的现实工具。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Mar;26(3):376-384. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0043. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
9
Enabling professional and personal growth among home care nurses through using the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention-An interpretive descriptive study.通过使用护工支持需求评估工具干预来促进家庭护理护士的专业和个人成长:一项阐释性描述研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):4092-4102. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16577. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.