Applebaum Allison J, Schofield Elizabeth, Kastrinos Amanda, Gebert Rebecca, Behrens Mia, Loschiavo Morgan, Shaffer Kelly M, Levine Marcia, Dannaoui Aimee, Bellantoni Courtney, Miller Melissa F, Zaleta Alexandra K
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Psychooncology. 2024 Feb;33(2):e6301. doi: 10.1002/pon.6301.
Distress screening is standard practice among oncology patients, yet few routine distress screening programs exist for cancer caregivers. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Cancer Support Source-Caregiver (CSS-CG, 33-item), an electronic distress screening and automated referral program with a consultation (S + C) to improve caregiver unmet needs, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and distress relative to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC; access to educational materials).
150 caregivers of patients with varying sites/stages of cancer were randomized to S + C or EUC and completed assessments at baseline, 3-months post-baseline, and 6-months post-baseline. A subset of participants (n = 10) completed in-depth qualitative interviews.
S + C was feasible: among 75 caregivers randomized to S + C, 66 (88%) completed CSS-CG and consultation. Top concerns reported were: (1) patient's pain and/or physical discomfort; (2) patient's cancer progressing/recurring; and (3) feeling nervous or afraid. Differences between groups in improvements on outcomes by T2 and T3 were modest (ds < 0.53) in favor of S + C. Qualitative data underscored the helpfulness of S + C in connecting caregivers to support and helping them feel cared for and integrated into cancer care.
S + C is feasible, acceptable, and yields more positive impact on emotional well-being than usual care. Future studies will examine programmatic impact among caregivers experiencing higher acuity of needs, and benefits of earlier integration of S + C on caregiver, patient, and healthcare system outcomes.
痛苦筛查是肿瘤患者的标准做法,但针对癌症护理者的常规痛苦筛查项目却很少。本研究的目的是证明癌症支持源-护理者(CSS-CG,33项)的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效,这是一个电子痛苦筛查和自动转诊项目,并提供咨询服务(S+C),以改善护理者未满足的需求、生活质量、焦虑、抑郁以及相对于强化常规护理(EUC;获取教育材料)的痛苦状况。
150名患有不同部位/分期癌症患者的护理者被随机分为S+C组或EUC组,并在基线、基线后3个月和基线后6个月完成评估。一部分参与者(n=10)完成了深入的定性访谈。
S+C是可行的:在75名被随机分配到S+C组的护理者中,66名(88%)完成了CSS-CG和咨询。报告的最主要担忧是:(1)患者的疼痛和/或身体不适;(2)患者癌症进展/复发;(3)感到紧张或害怕。两组在T2和T3时结局改善方面的差异不大(d<0.53),S+C组稍占优势。定性数据强调了S+C在将护理者与支持联系起来以及帮助他们感到被关心并融入癌症护理方面的帮助作用。
S+C是可行的、可接受的,并且比常规护理对情绪健康产生更积极的影响。未来的研究将考察该项目对需求更迫切的护理者的影响,以及早期整合S+C对护理者、患者和医疗系统结局的益处。