Suppr超能文献

一项针对肿瘤护理中家庭照顾者的痛苦筛查、咨询及定向转诊系统的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of a distress screening, consultation, and targeted referral system for family caregivers in oncologic care.

作者信息

Applebaum Allison J, Schofield Elizabeth, Kastrinos Amanda, Gebert Rebecca, Behrens Mia, Loschiavo Morgan, Shaffer Kelly M, Levine Marcia, Dannaoui Aimee, Bellantoni Courtney, Miller Melissa F, Zaleta Alexandra K

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2024 Feb;33(2):e6301. doi: 10.1002/pon.6301.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Distress screening is standard practice among oncology patients, yet few routine distress screening programs exist for cancer caregivers. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Cancer Support Source-Caregiver (CSS-CG, 33-item), an electronic distress screening and automated referral program with a consultation (S + C) to improve caregiver unmet needs, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and distress relative to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC; access to educational materials).

METHOD

150 caregivers of patients with varying sites/stages of cancer were randomized to S + C or EUC and completed assessments at baseline, 3-months post-baseline, and 6-months post-baseline. A subset of participants (n = 10) completed in-depth qualitative interviews.

RESULTS

S + C was feasible: among 75 caregivers randomized to S + C, 66 (88%) completed CSS-CG and consultation. Top concerns reported were: (1) patient's pain and/or physical discomfort; (2) patient's cancer progressing/recurring; and (3) feeling nervous or afraid. Differences between groups in improvements on outcomes by T2 and T3 were modest (ds < 0.53) in favor of S + C. Qualitative data underscored the helpfulness of S + C in connecting caregivers to support and helping them feel cared for and integrated into cancer care.

CONCLUSIONS

S + C is feasible, acceptable, and yields more positive impact on emotional well-being than usual care. Future studies will examine programmatic impact among caregivers experiencing higher acuity of needs, and benefits of earlier integration of S + C on caregiver, patient, and healthcare system outcomes.

摘要

目的

痛苦筛查是肿瘤患者的标准做法,但针对癌症护理者的常规痛苦筛查项目却很少。本研究的目的是证明癌症支持源-护理者(CSS-CG,33项)的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效,这是一个电子痛苦筛查和自动转诊项目,并提供咨询服务(S+C),以改善护理者未满足的需求、生活质量、焦虑、抑郁以及相对于强化常规护理(EUC;获取教育材料)的痛苦状况。

方法

150名患有不同部位/分期癌症患者的护理者被随机分为S+C组或EUC组,并在基线、基线后3个月和基线后6个月完成评估。一部分参与者(n=10)完成了深入的定性访谈。

结果

S+C是可行的:在75名被随机分配到S+C组的护理者中,66名(88%)完成了CSS-CG和咨询。报告的最主要担忧是:(1)患者的疼痛和/或身体不适;(2)患者癌症进展/复发;(3)感到紧张或害怕。两组在T2和T3时结局改善方面的差异不大(d<0.53),S+C组稍占优势。定性数据强调了S+C在将护理者与支持联系起来以及帮助他们感到被关心并融入癌症护理方面的帮助作用。

结论

S+C是可行的、可接受的,并且比常规护理对情绪健康产生更积极的影响。未来的研究将考察该项目对需求更迫切的护理者的影响,以及早期整合S+C对护理者、患者和医疗系统结局的益处。

相似文献

2
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
3
CancerSupportSource -Caregiver: Development of a distress screening measure for cancer caregivers.
Psychooncology. 2023 Mar;32(3):418-428. doi: 10.1002/pon.6092. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Pilot randomized psychosocial trial of a screening intervention in pediatric oncology.
Psychooncology. 2022 May;31(5):735-744. doi: 10.1002/pon.5857. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-Reported Outcomes Measures (FROMs) Screening Programs an Integral Part of Chronic Disease Management: A Scoping Review.
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339217. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339217. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Global unmet psychosocial needs in cancer care: health policy.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 16;78:102942. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102942. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
CancerSupportSource -Caregiver: Development of a distress screening measure for cancer caregivers.
Psychooncology. 2023 Mar;32(3):418-428. doi: 10.1002/pon.6092. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Cancer caregivers unmet needs and emotional states across cancer treatment phases.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0255901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255901. eCollection 2021.
4
The Family Caregiving Crisis Meets an Actual Pandemic.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e66-e69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Oct 1;17(10):1229-1249. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048.
7
Contextual and Cultural Influences on Caregivers of Hispanic Cancer Survivors.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;35(4):359-362. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
The Characteristics of Informal Cancer Caregivers in the United States.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;35(4):328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability of Distress Screening for Family Caregivers at a Cancer Surgery Center.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):159-169. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.159-169.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验