Berry R B, Fairshter R D
Chest. 1985 Nov;88(5):697-702. doi: 10.1378/chest.88.5.697.
The effects of deep inspiration upon expiratory flow rates and response to inhaled metaproterenol were studied in normal and asthmatic subjects using partial (PEFV) and maximal (MEFV) expiratory flow volume curves. Routine pulmonary function tests and specific conductance were also measured. Prior to administration of metaproterenol, 18 of 24 normal subjects and 11 of 24 asthmatic subjects (p 0.05) had higher flow rates on MEFV than on PEFV curves. The 11 volume history responsive asthmatic subjects showed better lung function and more density-dependence of expiratory flow than the other 13 asthmatic subjects; furthermore, the effect of lung inflation was significantly larger in the volume history responsive asthmatic subjects than in the volume history responsive normal subjects. Responses to inhaled metaproterenol were much larger on PEFV than MEFV curves; nevertheless, differences between normal and asthmatic subjects in metaproterenol responsiveness were less using PEFV curves. Thus, the use of PEFV curve measurement did not facilitate the detection of individual asthmatic responses to inhaled metaproterenol.
利用部分呼气流量容积曲线(PEFV)和最大呼气流量容积曲线(MEFV),在正常人和哮喘患者中研究了深吸气对呼气流量速率及对吸入间羟异丙肾上腺素反应的影响。还测量了常规肺功能测试和比传导率。在给予间羟异丙肾上腺素之前,24名正常受试者中有18名、24名哮喘患者中有11名(p<0.05)的MEFV曲线流量速率高于PEFV曲线。11名容积历史反应性哮喘患者比其他13名哮喘患者表现出更好的肺功能和呼气流量更强的密度依赖性;此外,容积历史反应性哮喘患者的肺膨胀效应明显大于容积历史反应性正常受试者。在PEFV曲线上对吸入间羟异丙肾上腺素的反应比对MEFV曲线的反应大得多;然而,使用PEFV曲线时,正常人和哮喘患者之间间羟异丙肾上腺素反应性的差异较小。因此,使用PEFV曲线测量不利于检测个体哮喘患者对吸入间羟异丙肾上腺素的反应。