• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有多少孩子的父母患有赌博障碍——一项基于德国的估计。

How many children have parents with gambling disorder - a Germany-based estimate.

作者信息

Stefan Nina, Schwarzkopf Larissa, Buth Sven, Meyer Gerhard, Bickl Andreas M

机构信息

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology - IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):2166. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23520-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-23520-7
PMID:40537747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12180145/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parental gambling disorder has detrimental financial, psychological, physiological, familial, and behavioral implications for the offspring, making these children highly vulnerable. In Germany, population-based estimates on how many minor children have parents with gambling disorder are lacking; thus, the immediacy of need for corresponding (public) health care policies remains unknown.

METHODS

Based on the population-representative German Gambling Survey 2023, we estimated the number of children having parents with gambling disorder, including estimates for rates at each parental gambling disorder severity level (mild, moderate, severe). Both cohabiting children and separate living children were considered. To extrapolate lower and upper bounds of estimates, data on number of parents in the household and average number of children was combined with official population statistics.

RESULTS

Of 282 participants with gambling disorder, 46.8% (n = 132) cohabit with 1.55 children on average; 16.7% (n = 47) are parents of 1.51 separate living children on average. Therefore, in Germany 574,079 to 604,966 children have a parent with gambling disorder, with about 84.0% of them (482,076 to 508,712) cohabiting with the gambling parent. The likelihood of cohabiting decreases with increasing gambling disorder severity (mild: 97.7%; moderate: 85.0%; severe: 72.2%).

DISCUSSION

In Germany about 1 in 25 children has a parent with gambling disorder. Given that parental gambling disorder is an established risk factor for developing own gambling problems, more comprehensive addiction care and health policy are needed to address this issue. Integrated care and counselling offers targeting both gambling parents and their children may be a promising starting point. Special attention should be paid to separate living children in these approaches.

摘要

背景

父母患赌博 disorder 会对子女产生有害的经济、心理、生理、家庭和行为影响,使这些孩子极易受到伤害。在德国,缺乏基于人群的关于有多少未成年子女的父母患有赌博 disorder 的估计;因此,相应(公共)卫生保健政策的迫切需求程度仍然未知。

方法

基于具有人群代表性的2023年德国赌博调查,我们估计了有父母患赌博 disorder 的儿童数量,包括对每个父母赌博 disorder 严重程度级别(轻度、中度、重度)的发生率估计。同居子女和分居子女均被考虑在内。为了推断估计的下限和上限,将家庭中父母数量和子女平均数量的数据与官方人口统计数据相结合。

结果

在282名患有赌博 disorder 的参与者中,46.8%(n = 132)平均与1.55个孩子同居;16.7%(n = 47)平均是1.51个分居子女的父母。因此,在德国,574,079至604,966名儿童有一位父母患有赌博 disorder,其中约84.0%(482,076至508,712)与患赌博 disorder 的父母同居。同居的可能性随着赌博 disorder 严重程度的增加而降低(轻度:97.7%;中度:85.0%;重度:72.2%)。

讨论

在德国,约每25名儿童中就有1名儿童的父母患有赌博 disorder。鉴于父母患赌博 disorder 是自身发展成赌博问题的既定风险因素,需要更全面的成瘾护理和卫生政策来解决这一问题。针对赌博父母及其子女的综合护理和咨询服务可能是一个有前景的起点。在这些方法中应特别关注分居子女。

注

原文中“gambling disorder”未明确具体中文术语,可根据实际医学定义准确表述,这里暂保留英文。

相似文献

1
How many children have parents with gambling disorder - a Germany-based estimate.有多少孩子的父母患有赌博障碍——一项基于德国的估计。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):2166. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23520-7.
2
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.对0至6岁唐氏综合征儿童言语、语言和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
9
Children's experiences of living with a parent with mental illness: A systematic review of qualitative studies using thematic analysis.儿童与患有精神疾病的父母共同生活的经历:运用主题分析法对定性研究的系统综述
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Mar;25(2):131-141. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12415. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Time for a public health response to gambling.是时候对赌博采取公共卫生应对措施了。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00248-2.
2
The prevalence of gambling and problematic gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.赌博和问题赌博的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Aug;9(8):e594-e613. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00126-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
How gambling harms others: The influence of relationship-type and closeness on harm, health, and wellbeing.赌博如何危害他人:关系类型和亲密度对伤害、健康及幸福的影响。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Jul 14;12(3):697-710. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00036. Print 2023 Oct 5.
4
Gambling Harm Experienced by Children Exposed to Parental Gambling: An Online Survey of Australians.儿童受父母赌博影响的赌博危害:澳大利亚的一项在线调查。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):181-200. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10211-4. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
Prevalence of Problem Gambling: A Meta-analysis of Recent Empirical Research (2016-2022).近年来实证研究中问题赌博的流行率:一项荟萃分析(2016-2022)。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Sep;39(3):1027-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10180-0. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
6
Gambling-related harms to concerned significant others: A national Australian prevalence study.赌博相关对相关重要他人的危害:一项全国性的澳大利亚流行研究。
J Behav Addict. 2022 Jun 30;11(2):361-372. doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00045. Print 2022 Jul 13.
7
How many children are exposed to at-risk parental gambling in Australia? Results from a representative national sample.在澳大利亚,有多少儿童接触到有风险的父母赌博?一项代表性的全国性样本研究结果。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jul;130:107305. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107305. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
How survey mode affects estimates of the prevalence of gambling harm: a multisurvey study.调查模式如何影响赌博危害发生率的估计:一项多调查研究。
Public Health. 2022 Mar;204:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Parental problem gambling and child wellbeing: Systematic review and synthesis of evidence.父母赌博问题与儿童福祉:证据的系统评价与综合。
Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;126:107205. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107205. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
The effect of gambling problems on the subjective wellbeing of gamblers' family and friends: Evidence from large-scale population research in Australia and Canada.赌博问题对赌徒家人和朋友主观幸福感的影响:来自澳大利亚和加拿大大规模人口研究的证据。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Nov 16;10(4):941-52. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00077.