Tulloch Catherine, Hing Nerilee, Browne Matthew, Rockloff Matthew, Hilbrecht Margo
1 School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
2 School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, QLD, Australia.
J Behav Addict. 2021 Nov 16;10(4):941-52. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00077.
Excessive time and money spent on gambling can result in harms, not only to people experiencing a gambling problem but also to their close family and friends ("concerned significant others"; CSOs). The current study aimed to explore whether, and to what extent, CSOs experience decrements to their wellbeing due to another person's gambling.
We analysed data from The Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (HILDA; N = 19,064) and the Canadian Quinte Longitudinal Study (QLS; N = 3,904). Participants either self-identified as CSOs (QLS) or were identified by living in a household with a person classified in the problem gambling category by the PGSI (HILDA). Subjective well-being was measured using the Personal Wellbeing Index and single-item questions on happiness and satisfaction with life.
CSOs reported lower subjective wellbeing than non-CSOs across both countries and on all three wellbeing measures. CSO status remained a significant predictor of lower wellbeing after controlling for demographic and socio-economic factors, and own-gambling problems. There were no significant differences across various relationships to the gambler, by gender, or between household and non-household CSOs.
Gambling-related harms experienced by CSOs was reliably associated with a decrease in wellbeing. This decrement to CSO's wellbeing was not as strong as that experienced by the person with the first-order gambling problem. Nevertheless, wellbeing decrements to CSOs are not limited to those living with a person with gambling problems in the household and thus affect many people.
在赌博上花费过多的时间和金钱会造成危害,不仅对有赌博问题的人,对其亲密的家人和朋友(“相关重要他人”;CSO)也是如此。本研究旨在探讨CSO是否以及在多大程度上会因他人赌博而导致自身幸福感下降。
我们分析了来自澳大利亚家庭收入与劳动力动态调查(HILDA;N = 19,064)和加拿大昆特纵向研究(QLS;N = 3,904)的数据。参与者要么自我认定为CSO(QLS),要么是通过与被PGSI归类为有问题赌博类别的人同住一个家庭来确定(HILDA)。使用个人幸福指数以及关于生活幸福度和满意度的单项问题来衡量主观幸福感。
在两个国家以及所有三项幸福感衡量指标上,CSO报告的主观幸福感均低于非CSO。在控制了人口统计学和社会经济因素以及自身赌博问题后,CSO身份仍然是幸福感较低的一个重要预测因素。在与赌徒的各种关系、性别以及家庭CSO和非家庭CSO之间,没有显著差异。
CSO经历的与赌博相关的危害与幸福感下降存在可靠关联。CSO幸福感的这种下降程度不如一级赌博问题者经历的那样强烈。然而,CSO幸福感的下降并不局限于与有赌博问题的人同住一个家庭的那些人,因此影响到很多人。