Suppr超能文献

精英和次精英冰球运动员的髋关节软骨间隙、活动范围及左右差异:一项病例对照试验

Hip Joint Intercartilage Space, Range of Motion, and Lateral Differences in Elite and Subelite Ice Hockey Players: A Case-Control Trial.

作者信息

Mala Jitka, Hybner Tomas, Stastny Petr

机构信息

Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 18;13(6):23259671251344240. doi: 10.1177/23259671251344240. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ice hockey players experience groin pain and imbalances in the muscles of the hip joint, possibly because of the condition of the intercartilage space (ICS).

PURPOSE

To describe the lateral differences in size of the articular ICS, range of motion, and adductor/abductor muscle strength between elite and subelite ice hockey players and a control group of participants who did not play ice hockey.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

33 elite hockey players, 26 subelite hockey players, and 30 non-ice hockey player controls were compared in terms of ICS thickness, isometric hip abductor muscle strength, hip range of motion, functional test results, and pain score. Two-way analysis of variance was used to identify differences in laterality and performance levels.

RESULTS

The ICS of the hip joint was smaller ( < .001) in both groups of ice hockey players than in the control group (0.97 ± 0.11 mm) and smaller ( = .005) on the backhand side (elite 0.66 ± 0.24 mm; subelite 0.65 ± 0.15 mm) than on the forehand side (elite 0.78 ± 0.18 mm; subelite 0.74 ± 0.24 mm) in both groups of hockey players. Compared with the control (41.6°± 4°) and subelite groups, the elite group had less ( < .001) hip external rotation (elite 30.4°± 6.1°; subelite 35°± 6.5°) and internal rotation (elite 31.5°± 5.1°; subelite 35.1°± 6.5°), with no differences in laterality ( > .05). Both hockey groups had positive hip pain provocation tests and greater ( < .001) hip adduction (elite 457 ± 85 N; subelite 450 ± 82 N) and abduction (elite 429 ± 60 N; subelite 422 ± 63 N) muscle strength than the controls (adduction 347 ± 70 N; abduction 346 ± 75 N). Elite players had a greater ( = .008) adductor strength ratio on the backhand side (1.16 ± 19) than the control group (1.02 ± 0.15).

CONCLUSION

Ice hockey players had a smaller ICS of the hip joint, particularly on the backhand side. These structural changes were accompanied by reduced range of motion in the hip joint, increased pain, and asymmetries in muscle strength. Hip range of motion and symmetry of adductor/abductor muscle strength should be considered when diagnosing ice hockey players. ICS assessment via sonography might become a useful tool for the evaluation of structural changes in the hip. Research on ice hockey-related injuries should focus more on the structural and functional condition of the backhand side of the hip.

摘要

背景

冰球运动员会经历腹股沟疼痛以及髋关节肌肉失衡,这可能是由于软骨间隙(ICS)的状况所致。

目的

描述精英和非精英冰球运动员与未参与冰球运动的对照组参与者之间,关节ICS大小、运动范围以及内收肌/外展肌力量的侧向差异。

研究设计

横断面研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

比较33名精英冰球运动员、26名非精英冰球运动员和30名非冰球运动员对照组的ICS厚度、等长髋关节外展肌力量、髋关节运动范围、功能测试结果和疼痛评分。采用双向方差分析来确定侧向性和表现水平的差异。

结果

两组冰球运动员的髋关节ICS均小于对照组(0.97±0.11毫米)(P<0.001),且两组冰球运动员反手侧的ICS均小于正手侧(精英组:反手侧0.66±0.24毫米;非精英组:反手侧0.65±0.15毫米;精英组:正手侧0.78±0.18毫米;非精英组:正手侧0.74±0.24毫米)(P = 0.005)。与对照组(41.6°±4°)和非精英组相比,精英组的髋关节外旋(精英组:30.4°±6.1°;非精英组:35°±6.5°)和内旋(精英组:31.5°±5.1°;非精英组:35.1°±6.5°)角度更小(P<0.001),且在侧向性方面无差异(P>0.05)。两组冰球运动员的髋关节疼痛激发试验均为阳性,且髋关节内收(精英组:457±85牛;非精英组:450±82牛)和外展(精英组:429±60牛;非精英组:422±63牛)肌肉力量均大于对照组(内收:347±70牛;外展:346±75牛)(P<0.001)。精英运动员反手侧的内收肌力量比值(1.16±0.19)大于对照组(1.02±0.15)(P = 0.008)。

结论

冰球运动员的髋关节ICS较小,尤其是反手侧。这些结构变化伴随着髋关节运动范围减小、疼痛加剧以及肌肉力量不对称。在诊断冰球运动员时,应考虑髋关节运动范围以及内收肌/外展肌力量的对称性。通过超声检查评估ICS可能成为评估髋关节结构变化的有用工具。与冰球相关损伤的研究应更多地关注髋关节反手侧的结构和功能状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cfe/12177247/1eb1be125736/10.1177_23259671251344240-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验