• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析基于Llama 3的本体公理翻译方法。

Analyzing Llama 3-based Approach for Axiom Translation from Ontologies.

作者信息

Hao Xubing, Cui Licong, Tao Cui, Roberts Kirk, Amith Muhammad

机构信息

McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic.

出版信息

CEUR Workshop Proc. 2024 Nov;3853.

PMID:40538705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178606/
Abstract

Ontology development involves a top-down approach where ontology engineers and domain experts collaboratively define and evaluate ontological elements and axioms. Translating ontology axioms into natural language can significantly aid in ontology evaluation by making the content more understandable to subject matter experts who may lack a background in knowledge engineering. In this preliminary study, we investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) in axiom translation from ontologies to facilitate ontology evaluation. We utilize Llama 3 to translate 1,192 ontology axioms across 19 distinct axiom types from five published ontologies. Results show that 163 (13.67%) of the Llama 3 translation of the axiom are accurately represented, 268 (22.48%) are not accurately represented, and 761 (63.84%) are partially accurate. Our manual evaluation of the Llama 3 translation indicates some competency in producing hierarchical natural language equivalents while revealing some limitations when translating complex axioms. Nonetheless, there are opportunities to improve the results with few-shot training or using LLMs to provide support in knowledge engineering for ontologies.

摘要

本体开发涉及一种自上而下的方法,本体工程师和领域专家在其中协作定义和评估本体元素及公理。将本体公理翻译成自然语言,可以使缺乏知识工程背景的主题专家更容易理解内容,从而极大地有助于本体评估。在这项初步研究中,我们探讨了大语言模型(LLMs)在将本体公理翻译以促进本体评估方面的潜力。我们利用Llama 3翻译来自五个已发表本体的19种不同公理类型的1192条本体公理。结果显示,Llama 3对公理的翻译中有163条(13.67%)得到了准确表述,268条(22.48%)未得到准确表述,761条(63.84%)部分准确。我们对Llama 3翻译的人工评估表明,它在生成层次化自然语言等效表述方面有一定能力,但在翻译复杂公理时也存在一些局限性。尽管如此,通过少样本训练或利用大语言模型为本体的知识工程提供支持,仍有机会改进结果。

相似文献

1
Analyzing Llama 3-based Approach for Axiom Translation from Ontologies.分析基于Llama 3的本体公理翻译方法。
CEUR Workshop Proc. 2024 Nov;3853.
2
Ontology enrichment using a large language model: Applying lexical, semantic, and knowledge network-based similarity for concept placement.使用大语言模型进行本体丰富:将基于词汇、语义和知识网络的相似性应用于概念放置。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Aug;168:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104865. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3
A systematic review of speech, language and communication interventions for children with Down syndrome from 0 to 6 years.对0至6岁唐氏综合征儿童言语、语言和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):441-463. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12699. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
4
Patient safety classifications, taxonomies and ontologies: A systematic review on development and evaluation methodologies.患者安全分类、分类法和本体论:开发和评估方法的系统评价。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Sep;133:104150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104150. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.用于治疗儿童和青少年破坏性行为障碍的非典型抗精神病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 9;8(8):CD008559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008559.pub3.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Data extraction from free-text stroke CT reports using GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B: the impact of annotation guidelines.使用GPT-4o和Llama-3.3-70B从自由文本中风CT报告中提取数据:注释指南的影响
Eur Radiol Exp. 2025 Jun 19;9(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41747-025-00600-2.
10
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A Semantic Approach to Describe Social and Economic Characteristics That Impact Health Outcomes (Social Determinants of Health): Ontology Development Study.一种描述影响健康结果的社会和经济特征(健康的社会决定因素)的语义方法:本体开发研究。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Mar 13;16:e52845. doi: 10.2196/52845.
2
DEVO: an ontology to assist with dermoscopic feature standardization.DEVO:一种辅助皮肤镜特征标准化的本体。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 18;23(Suppl 1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02251-y.
3
CRENO: An ontology to model concepts relating to culture, race, ethnicity, and nationality for health data.CRENO:一个用于为健康数据建模与文化、种族、民族和国籍相关概念的本体。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:398-407. eCollection 2023.
4
The ontology of fast food facts: conceptualization of nutritional fast food data for consumers and semantic web applications.快餐事实本体论:消费者营养快餐数据的概念化和语义 Web 应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 9;21(Suppl 7):275. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01636-1.
5
CNFE-SE: a novel approach combining complex network-based feature engineering and stacked ensemble to predict the success of intrauterine insemination and ranking the features.CNFE-SE:一种结合基于复杂网络的特征工程和堆叠集成的新方法,用于预测宫腔内人工授精的成功率和对特征进行排序。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 2;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01362-0.
6
Identifying Principles for the Construction of an Ontology-Based Knowledge Base: A Case Study Approach.识别基于本体的知识库构建原则:一种案例研究方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Dec 21;6(4):e52. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9979.
7
Assessing the practice of biomedical ontology evaluation: Gaps and opportunities.评估生物医学本体评估实践:差距与机遇。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Apr;80:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
8
Expressing Biomedical Ontologies in Natural Language for Expert Evaluation.以自然语言表达生物医学本体用于专家评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:838-842.
9
A Systematic Analysis of Term Reuse and Term Overlap across Biomedical Ontologies.生物医学本体中术语复用与术语重叠的系统分析
Semant Web. 2017;8(6):853-871. doi: 10.3233/sw-160238.