• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师主导的抗生素管理审核反馈干预影响的系统评价与荟萃分析方案

Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship audit-feedback intervention.

作者信息

Jawhar Duaa Salem, Khan Amer Hayat, Alam Khurshid

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

Saqr Hospital, Pharmacy Department, Emirates Health Service, Ras al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2025 May 30;14:103399. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103399. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103399
PMID:40539091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12177175/
Abstract

The rise of resistance to antibiotic agents continues to present a substantial challenge to healthcare systems. In response, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have been widely endorsed as a core strategy to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials and to curb the progression of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions hold significant promise due to pharmacists' clinical expertise and direct role in optimizing antimicrobial prescribing. However, despite their potential, the current body of evidence evaluating the effectiveness of pharmacist-led audit and feedback within ASPs remains limited and fragmented. A clearer understanding of their impact is essential to inform policy decisions, support broader implementation, and enhance the overall effectiveness of stewardship efforts. This protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420251036088. The review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.A comprehensive search will be carried out across four major databases, and studies will be selected based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies will be assessed using Cochrane riak of bias assessment tools. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plots and Egger's test. For the quantitative synthesis, a random-effects model will be employed.•This protocol outlines a rigorous plan for conducting a high-quality meta-analysis examining the impact of pharmacist-led audit and feedback interventions within antibiotic stewardship programs.•It details the full methodological framework, from topic selection through to the statistical approaches planned for data synthesis.•By publicly sharing our protocol through an academic publishing platform, we aim to promote transparency, invite constructive input, and contribute to raising the methodological standards for meta-analyses in the domain of antibiotic stewardship.

摘要

抗生素耐药性的不断上升继续给医疗保健系统带来重大挑战。作为应对措施,抗生素管理计划(ASP)已被广泛认可为促进抗菌药物合理使用和遏制抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)进展的核心策略。由于药剂师在优化抗菌药物处方方面的临床专业知识和直接作用,由药剂师主导的审核与反馈干预措施具有重大前景。然而,尽管其具有潜力,但目前评估ASP中由药剂师主导的审核与反馈有效性的证据仍然有限且零散。更清楚地了解其影响对于为政策决策提供信息、支持更广泛的实施以及提高管理工作的整体有效性至关重要。本方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD420251036088。该综述将按照PRISMA指南进行。将在四个主要数据库中进行全面检索,并将根据明确界定的纳入和排除标准选择研究。将使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。将使用漏斗图和Egger检验检查发表偏倚。对于定量合成,将采用随机效应模型。

•本方案概述了一项严谨的计划,用于进行一项高质量的荟萃分析,以检验抗生素管理计划中由药剂师主导的审核与反馈干预措施的影响。

•它详细阐述了完整的方法框架,从主题选择到计划用于数据合成的统计方法。

•通过在学术出版平台上公开分享我们的方案,我们旨在提高透明度,征求建设性意见,并有助于提高抗生素管理领域荟萃分析的方法标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10de/12177175/997d65473c14/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10de/12177175/3fada78c3b95/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10de/12177175/997d65473c14/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10de/12177175/3fada78c3b95/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10de/12177175/997d65473c14/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of impact of pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship audit-feedback intervention.药剂师主导的抗生素管理审核反馈干预影响的系统评价与荟萃分析方案
MethodsX. 2025 May 30;14:103399. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103399. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
6
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050.全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担 1990-2021:一项系统分析及对 2050 年的预测。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 28;404(10459):1199-1226. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments.
风险偏倚可视化 (robvis):一个用于可视化风险偏倚评估的 R 包和 Shiny 网络应用程序。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.