Suppr超能文献

较高护理水平下儿童和青少年回避/限制性食物摄入障碍及神经性厌食症的治疗结果

Treatment outcomes for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and anorexia nervosa among children and adolescents in higher levels of care.

作者信息

Rienecke Renee D, Manwaring Jamie, Duffy Alan, Mehler Philip S, Blalock Dan V

机构信息

Eating Recovery Center and Pathlight Mood & Anxiety Centers, Denver, United States of America.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Jun 20:1-12. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2025.2504579.

Abstract

There is large variability in the way that outcomes are measured for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), with many studies focusing solely on weight gain or using measures that are not designed or validated to assess ARFID symptoms, such as the widely used Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). The current study compared treatment outcomes for children/adolescents with ARFID to children/adolescents with anorexia nervosa-restricting subtype (AN-R) on weight variables (% of expected body weight (%EBW)), ARFID symptoms as measured using the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire (EDY-Q), and eating disorder (ED) symptoms (as measured using the EDE-Q). Scores for both groups of patients on each measure were examined to preliminarily determine the appropriateness of each measure for each diagnosis. Participants were 220 children/adolescents aged 9 to 17 receiving treatment at a large multisite treatment facility between November 2020 and June 2023. Self-report questionnaires were completed at intake and discharge, and weight was recorded throughout treatment. EDY-Q, EDE-Q, and %EBW scores changed significantly ( < 0.001) from admission to discharge for both groups of patients. Effect sizes for changes in EDY-Q were similarly large for patients with AN-R ( = 0.91) and ARFID ( = 0.83). Effect sizes for changes in EDE-Q were large for patients with AN-R ( = 0.79) and small-to-medium for patients with ARFID ( = 0.47). Results suggest that the EDY-Q may be assessing symptoms present in both patients with ARFID and patients with AN-R. The study's findings suggest that the EDE-Q is not an appropriate measure for assessing outcomes among patients with ARFID.

摘要

回避/限制型食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的结果测量方式存在很大差异,许多研究仅关注体重增加,或使用并非专门设计或验证用于评估ARFID症状的测量方法,比如广泛使用的饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)。本研究比较了患有ARFID的儿童/青少年与神经性厌食症限制型亚型(AN-R)的儿童/青少年在体重变量(预期体重百分比(%EBW))、使用青少年饮食失调问卷(EDY-Q)测量的ARFID症状以及饮食失调(ED)症状(使用EDE-Q测量)方面的治疗结果。对两组患者在每项测量上的得分进行了检查,以初步确定每项测量对每种诊断的适用性。参与者为220名年龄在9至17岁之间的儿童/青少年,他们于2020年11月至2023年6月在一家大型多地点治疗机构接受治疗。在入院和出院时完成了自我报告问卷,并在整个治疗过程中记录了体重。两组患者从入院到出院,EDY-Q、EDE-Q和%EBW得分均有显著变化(<0.001)。AN-R患者(=0.91)和ARFID患者(=0.83)的EDY-Q变化效应大小相似。AN-R患者(=0.79)的EDE-Q变化效应大小较大,而ARFID患者(=0.47)的变化效应大小为小到中等。结果表明,EDY-Q可能正在评估ARFID患者和AN-R患者中都存在的症状。该研究结果表明,EDE-Q不是评估ARFID患者治疗结果的合适测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验