Suppr超能文献

社会支持双重缺失的老年人的心血管风险:对加拿大老年纵向研究队列的性别敏感横断面分析

Cardiovascular risk in aging adults with double deficits in social support: A gender-sensitive, cross-sectional analysis of the CLSA cohort.

作者信息

Conklin Annalijn I, Safari Abdollah, Veenstra Gerry, Khan Nadia A

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Health Care Research Institute, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 20;20(6):e0309634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309634. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Synergistic effects of diverse social supports (informational, tangible, emotional and belonging) on cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVRF), by gender, is unknown.

AIM

To quantify gender differences in the singular and combined associations of four different forms of social support with cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVRF) in aging adults.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of 28,779 adults (45-85 years) in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive cohort (2011-15); independent variables were self-reported measures of informational, tangible, emotional and belonging support; dependent variables were clinically measured BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure. We used stratified multivariable linear and logistic regression with principal component regression with cross-product terms to post-estimate adjusted means and 95% CIs for combined associations.

RESULTS

All low-low support combinations were consistently associated with the highest adjusted mean BMI and WC levels among women. Adjusted mean BMI differences were largest among women with low informational and low tangible supports (27.95 kg/m2 [27.93, 27.97]), compared to women with high informational and high tangible supports (27.34 kg/m2 [27.30, 27.38]). Similarly, the greatest difference in adjusted mean WC was seen among women with low informational and low emotional supports (88.69 cm [88.62, 88.76]) compared to the high-high combination (86.88 cm [86.75, 87.01]). Women with low availability of informational support, with or without deficits in a second support type, had the highest adjusted mean SBP levels (range: 119.94 to 119.95 mmHg). Among men, mean CVRFs were not consistently worse for combinations of dual deficits in social support. Results were null for DBP.

CONCLUSION

Women with two deficits in social supports, particularly combinations with low informational support, showed worse CVRF measures than one social support deficit. Results indicated no antagonistic/synergistic effects of social support on CVRFs. Heart health care and prevention for aging women would benefit from ensuring informational support with other supports is available.

摘要

背景

不同类型社会支持(信息性、实质性、情感性和归属感)对心血管疾病风险因素(CVRF)的协同作用,以及性别差异尚不清楚。

目的

量化四种不同形式的社会支持与老年人心血管疾病风险因素(CVRF)的单一及联合关联中的性别差异。

方法

对加拿大老龄化纵向研究综合队列(2011 - 2015年)中的28779名成年人(45 - 85岁)进行横断面研究;自变量为自我报告的信息性、实质性、情感性和归属感支持的测量值;因变量为临床测量的体重指数(BMI)、腰围和血压。我们使用分层多变量线性和逻辑回归以及带有交叉乘积项的主成分回归来估计调整后的均值和联合关联的95%置信区间。

结果

在女性中,所有低 - 低支持组合始终与最高的调整后平均BMI和腰围水平相关。与具有高信息性和高实质性支持的女性(27.34kg/m² [27.30, 27.38])相比,信息性和实质性支持低的女性调整后平均BMI差异最大(27.95kg/m² [27.93, 27.97])。同样,与高 - 高组合(86.88cm [86.75, 87.01])相比,信息性和情感性支持低的女性调整后平均腰围差异最大(88.69cm [88.62, 88.76])。信息性支持可用性低的女性,无论是否存在第二种支持类型的不足,其调整后平均收缩压水平最高(范围:119.94至119.95mmHg)。在男性中,社会支持双重不足的组合的平均CVRF并非始终更差。舒张压结果为无差异。

结论

社会支持存在两种不足的女性,特别是信息性支持低的组合,其CVRF指标比一种社会支持不足的情况更差。结果表明社会支持对CVRF没有拮抗/协同作用。确保为老年女性提供信息性支持以及其他支持,将有益于心脏健康护理和预防。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验