Kamani Christel H, Brown Louise, Anderton Thomas, Tomoaia Raluca, Soo Chin, Gulsin Gaurav S, Broadbent David A, Yeo Jian L, Wood Alice L, Saunderson Christopher E D, Botis Ioannis, Das Arka, Jex Nicholas, Chowdhary Amrit, Thirunavukarasu Sharmaine, Sharrack Noor, Swoboda Peter P, Xue Hui, Greenwood John P, Adlam David, Levelt Eylem, McCann Gerry P, Kellman Peter, Plein Sven
Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Teaching Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne - Switzerland; Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Teaching Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne - Switzerland.
Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Jun 19:101927. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101927.
The myocardial blood flow (MBF) transmural distribution between the subendocardial (ENDO) and subepicardial (EPI) layers under resting and hyperaemic conditions can aid in the diagnosis of several forms of heart disease. Recently proposed automated in-line myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows pixel-wise quantification of ENDO- and EPI-MBF, but normal values for these parameters are lacking.
To establish normal values for transmural distribution of MBF in a healthy population.
138 healthy participants from two centres underwent adenosine stress and rest myocardial perfusion CMR. Global and myocardial slice-specific stress/rest ENDO- and EPI-MBF values were derived using pixel-wise in-line automatic post-processing, and transmural perfusion metrics [ENDO and EPI myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR, MPR); stress and rest ENDO-to-EPI gradient (sGRAD and rGRAD)] were computed using the Gadgetron software.
The study cohort comprised 84 males and 54 females (mean age: 50 ± 36) with no cardiovascular disease or risk factors. In the entire cohort, MPR (3.3 ± 1.2) was significantly lower (p<0.001) than MPR (3.9 ± 1.2). sGRAD (0.98 ± 0.09) was significantly lower (p<0.001) than rGRAD (1.11 ± 0.07). "While there were no sex-specific differences in the majority of these metrics, all correlated inversely with increasing age. We propose specific values for each slice. These are conditional to the pulse sequence, acquisition timing and analysis method used in this work, as mean ± SD values at the basal, mid and apical level for MPR (3.7 ± 1.1, 3.3 ± 0.9, 3.6 ± 1.0), MPR (4.0 ± 1.1, 3.9 ± 1.1, 4.0 ± 1.1), sGRAD (1.00 ± 0.13, 0.92 ± 0.09, 1.06 ± 0.18) and rGRAD (1.10 ± 0.09, 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.18 ± 0.11).
Normal global and myocardial slice-specific values of MPR, MPR, sGRAD and rGRAD using in-line automated MBF quantification from first pass myocardial perfusion CMR are presented. While there were no sex-specific differences in any of these metrics, all correlated inversely with increasing age. Understanding the MBF dynamics of the myocardial layers in healthy subjects will help to characterize MBF alterations in patients with coronary artery disease or microvascular dysfunction.
静息和充血状态下心肌内膜(ENDO)和心外膜(EPI)层之间的心肌血流(MBF)透壁分布有助于多种形式心脏病的诊断。最近提出的在线自动心肌灌注心血管磁共振成像(CMR)可实现ENDO-MBF和EPI-MBF的逐像素定量,但缺乏这些参数的正常值。
建立健康人群中MBF透壁分布的正常值。
来自两个中心的138名健康参与者接受了腺苷负荷和静息心肌灌注CMR检查。使用逐像素在线自动后处理得出整体和心肌层面特定的负荷/静息ENDO-MBF和EPI-MBF值,并使用Gadgetron软件计算透壁灌注指标[ENDO和EPI心肌灌注储备(MPR、MPR);负荷和静息ENDO与EPI梯度(sGRAD和rGRAD)]。
研究队列包括84名男性和54名女性(平均年龄:50±36岁),无心血管疾病或危险因素。在整个队列中,MPR(3.3±1.2)显著低于MPR(3.9±1.2)(p<0.001)。sGRAD(0.98±0.09)显著低于rGRAD(1.11±0.07)(p<0.001)。虽然这些指标中的大多数没有性别差异,但所有指标均与年龄增长呈负相关。我们提出了每个层面的具体值。这些值取决于本研究中使用的脉冲序列、采集时间和分析方法,为MPR、MPR、sGRAD和rGRAD在心底、心中和心尖层面的平均值±标准差,分别为(3.7±1.1、3.3±0.9、3.6±1.0)、(4.0±1.1、3.9±1.1、4.0±1.1)、(1.00±0.13、0.92±0.09、1.06±0.18)和(1.10±0.09、1.09±0.07、1.18±0.11)。
给出了使用首次通过心肌灌注CMR在线自动MBF定量得出的MPR、MPR、sGRAD和rGRAD的整体和心肌层面特定正常值。虽然这些指标中没有任何性别差异,但所有指标均与年龄增长呈负相关。了解健康受试者心肌层的MBF动态将有助于明确冠心病或微血管功能障碍患者的MBF改变情况。