Suppr超能文献

在三个文化背景不同的中等收入国家开展的学校戒烟试验(ASSIST全球):一项随机可行性研究方案

A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial in three culturally different middle-income countries (ASSIST global): protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

作者信息

Soe Yin Nwe, Thomson Meigan, Reid Kate, Moore Laurence, Bintoro Bagas Suryo, Dong Bin, Good Sally, Hu Peijin, Long Emily, Mateo Nino Jose, McMeekin Nicola, Padmawati Retna Siwi, Prabandari Yayi Suryo, Purvis Anthony, Salanga Maria Guadalupe, Semple Sean, Llorin Charisse Tan, Wang Jing-Yi, Simpson Sharon Anne

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e096963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096963.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Around 80% of the world's smokers live in lower-middle income countries and smoking rates in China, Philippines and Indonesia are very high. Evidence suggests that most people begin smoking or become habitual smokers before reaching adulthood. This highlights the need for a smoking prevention intervention focused on young people. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial) is a 'peer-led', school-based smoking prevention intervention, shown to be effective in the UK. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale effectiveness evaluation of an adapted version of the ASSIST intervention in China, Indonesia or the Philippines. However, due to issues with obtaining relevant approvals, China was removed from the trial with the approval of the funder and Trial Steering Committee, and the study will only be completed in Indonesia and the Philippines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A feasibility mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial in 10 schools (six intervention, four control) in each of the two countries. Participants will be students aged c13-14 in mainstream ('lower secondary') schools. In addition to their usual education on smoking, intervention schools will receive the ASSIST intervention which is based on 'diffusion of innovation' theory, with new norms and behaviours promoted through: (1) peer modelling by locally influential individuals; and (2) information disseminated by them through their social networks. Control schools will continue with their usual education around smoking prevention.The key outcome of the study is whether prespecified progression criteria relating to recruitment, retention, acceptability and feasibility have been met in order to progress to a larger cluster randomised controlled effectiveness trial in one or more of the countries. A mixed-methods process evaluation will assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of intervention delivery, exposure to and reach of the intervention. The feasibility of trial processes including outcome measurement will be assessed. An economic evaluation will estimate the costs of the ASSIST intervention. Statistical analyses will focus on feasibility criteria, and qualitative data will be analysed using a framework approach. Outcomes assessed will include self-reported smoking behaviour (own and that of friends and family); vaping and other forms of nicotine use; smoking-related attitudes and knowledge; smoking norms; self-esteem; self-efficacy; (all at baseline and 7 month follow-up) and exhaled carbon monoxide concentration (at follow-up only).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS) Ethics Committee (ref: 200210204), the De La Salle University Research Ethics Review Committee (ref: 2023-012C) and the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee (MHREC); Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing; Universitas Gadjah Mada (ref: KE/FK/1205/EC/2022). The trial is sponsored by the University of Glasgow (Head of Research Regulation and Compliance-debra.stuart@glasgow.ac.uk). The sponsor will not have input in data collection, management, analysis and interpretation; write up and submissions for publication.The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in expert journals and conference presentations and targeted communications to schools, policymakers and the public.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN99140476.

摘要

引言

全球约80%的吸烟者生活在中低收入国家,中国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚的吸烟率非常高。有证据表明,大多数人在成年之前就开始吸烟或成为习惯性吸烟者。这凸显了针对年轻人开展吸烟预防干预措施的必要性。“助力”(学校戒烟试验)是一项由同伴主导、以学校为基础的吸烟预防干预措施,在英国已证明有效。本研究的目的是评估在中国、印度尼西亚或菲律宾对“助力”干预措施的改编版本进行全面有效性评估的可行性。然而,由于获取相关批准存在问题,经资助者和试验指导委员会批准,中国退出了试验,该研究将仅在印度尼西亚和菲律宾完成。

方法与分析

在两个国家的10所学校(6所干预学校、4所对照学校)开展一项可行性混合方法整群随机对照试验。参与者将是主流(“初中”)学校中年龄约13 - 14岁的学生。除了常规的吸烟教育外,干预学校将接受基于“创新扩散”理论的“助力”干预措施,通过以下方式推广新的规范和行为:(1)由当地有影响力的个人进行同伴示范;(2)他们通过社交网络传播信息。对照学校将继续开展常规的吸烟预防教育。本研究的关键结果是是否满足了与招募、留存、可接受性和可行性相关的预定进展标准,以便在一个或多个国家推进更大规模的整群随机对照有效性试验。一项混合方法过程评估将评估干预措施实施的可接受性、可行性和保真度,干预措施的暴露程度和覆盖范围。将评估包括结果测量在内的试验过程的可行性。一项经济评估将估算 “助力” 干预措施的成本。统计分析将聚焦于可行性标准,定性数据将采用框架法进行分析。评估的结果将包括自我报告的吸烟行为(自己以及朋友和家人的);吸电子烟和其他形式的尼古丁使用;与吸烟相关的态度和知识;吸烟规范;自尊;自我效能感(均在基线和7个月随访时)以及呼出一氧化碳浓度(仅在随访时)。

伦理与传播

该试验已获得格拉斯哥大学医学、兽医与生命科学学院(MVLS)伦理委员会(参考编号:200210204)、德拉萨勒大学研究伦理审查委员会(参考编号:2023 - 012C)以及医学与健康研究伦理委员会(MHREC);加查马达大学医学、公共卫生与护理学院(参考编号:KE/FK/1205/EC/2022)的批准。该试验由格拉斯哥大学赞助(研究监管与合规负责人 - debra.stuart@glasgow.ac.uk)。赞助方不会参与数据收集、管理、分析和解释;撰写报告以及提交发表。研究结果将通过在专业期刊上发表的同行评审文章、会议报告以及针对学校、政策制定者和公众有针对性的宣传进行传播。

试验注册号

ISRCTN99140476

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/85e519f4d4f7/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验