• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在三个文化背景不同的中等收入国家开展的学校戒烟试验(ASSIST全球):一项随机可行性研究方案

A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial in three culturally different middle-income countries (ASSIST global): protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

作者信息

Soe Yin Nwe, Thomson Meigan, Reid Kate, Moore Laurence, Bintoro Bagas Suryo, Dong Bin, Good Sally, Hu Peijin, Long Emily, Mateo Nino Jose, McMeekin Nicola, Padmawati Retna Siwi, Prabandari Yayi Suryo, Purvis Anthony, Salanga Maria Guadalupe, Semple Sean, Llorin Charisse Tan, Wang Jing-Yi, Simpson Sharon Anne

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e096963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096963.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096963
PMID:40545305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12184387/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Around 80% of the world's smokers live in lower-middle income countries and smoking rates in China, Philippines and Indonesia are very high. Evidence suggests that most people begin smoking or become habitual smokers before reaching adulthood. This highlights the need for a smoking prevention intervention focused on young people. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial) is a 'peer-led', school-based smoking prevention intervention, shown to be effective in the UK. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale effectiveness evaluation of an adapted version of the ASSIST intervention in China, Indonesia or the Philippines. However, due to issues with obtaining relevant approvals, China was removed from the trial with the approval of the funder and Trial Steering Committee, and the study will only be completed in Indonesia and the Philippines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A feasibility mixed-methods cluster randomised controlled trial in 10 schools (six intervention, four control) in each of the two countries. Participants will be students aged c13-14 in mainstream ('lower secondary') schools. In addition to their usual education on smoking, intervention schools will receive the ASSIST intervention which is based on 'diffusion of innovation' theory, with new norms and behaviours promoted through: (1) peer modelling by locally influential individuals; and (2) information disseminated by them through their social networks. Control schools will continue with their usual education around smoking prevention.The key outcome of the study is whether prespecified progression criteria relating to recruitment, retention, acceptability and feasibility have been met in order to progress to a larger cluster randomised controlled effectiveness trial in one or more of the countries. A mixed-methods process evaluation will assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of intervention delivery, exposure to and reach of the intervention. The feasibility of trial processes including outcome measurement will be assessed. An economic evaluation will estimate the costs of the ASSIST intervention. Statistical analyses will focus on feasibility criteria, and qualitative data will be analysed using a framework approach. Outcomes assessed will include self-reported smoking behaviour (own and that of friends and family); vaping and other forms of nicotine use; smoking-related attitudes and knowledge; smoking norms; self-esteem; self-efficacy; (all at baseline and 7 month follow-up) and exhaled carbon monoxide concentration (at follow-up only).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS) Ethics Committee (ref: 200210204), the De La Salle University Research Ethics Review Committee (ref: 2023-012C) and the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee (MHREC); Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing; Universitas Gadjah Mada (ref: KE/FK/1205/EC/2022). The trial is sponsored by the University of Glasgow (Head of Research Regulation and Compliance-debra.stuart@glasgow.ac.uk). The sponsor will not have input in data collection, management, analysis and interpretation; write up and submissions for publication.The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in expert journals and conference presentations and targeted communications to schools, policymakers and the public.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN99140476.

摘要

引言

全球约80%的吸烟者生活在中低收入国家,中国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚的吸烟率非常高。有证据表明,大多数人在成年之前就开始吸烟或成为习惯性吸烟者。这凸显了针对年轻人开展吸烟预防干预措施的必要性。“助力”(学校戒烟试验)是一项由同伴主导、以学校为基础的吸烟预防干预措施,在英国已证明有效。本研究的目的是评估在中国、印度尼西亚或菲律宾对“助力”干预措施的改编版本进行全面有效性评估的可行性。然而,由于获取相关批准存在问题,经资助者和试验指导委员会批准,中国退出了试验,该研究将仅在印度尼西亚和菲律宾完成。

方法与分析

在两个国家的10所学校(6所干预学校、4所对照学校)开展一项可行性混合方法整群随机对照试验。参与者将是主流(“初中”)学校中年龄约13 - 14岁的学生。除了常规的吸烟教育外,干预学校将接受基于“创新扩散”理论的“助力”干预措施,通过以下方式推广新的规范和行为:(1)由当地有影响力的个人进行同伴示范;(2)他们通过社交网络传播信息。对照学校将继续开展常规的吸烟预防教育。本研究的关键结果是是否满足了与招募、留存、可接受性和可行性相关的预定进展标准,以便在一个或多个国家推进更大规模的整群随机对照有效性试验。一项混合方法过程评估将评估干预措施实施的可接受性、可行性和保真度,干预措施的暴露程度和覆盖范围。将评估包括结果测量在内的试验过程的可行性。一项经济评估将估算 “助力” 干预措施的成本。统计分析将聚焦于可行性标准,定性数据将采用框架法进行分析。评估的结果将包括自我报告的吸烟行为(自己以及朋友和家人的);吸电子烟和其他形式的尼古丁使用;与吸烟相关的态度和知识;吸烟规范;自尊;自我效能感(均在基线和7个月随访时)以及呼出一氧化碳浓度(仅在随访时)。

伦理与传播

该试验已获得格拉斯哥大学医学、兽医与生命科学学院(MVLS)伦理委员会(参考编号:200210204)、德拉萨勒大学研究伦理审查委员会(参考编号:2023 - 012C)以及医学与健康研究伦理委员会(MHREC);加查马达大学医学、公共卫生与护理学院(参考编号:KE/FK/1205/EC/2022)的批准。该试验由格拉斯哥大学赞助(研究监管与合规负责人 - debra.stuart@glasgow.ac.uk)。赞助方不会参与数据收集、管理、分析和解释;撰写报告以及提交发表。研究结果将通过在专业期刊上发表的同行评审文章、会议报告以及针对学校、政策制定者和公众有针对性的宣传进行传播。

试验注册号

ISRCTN99140476

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/fbc2a65cd74c/bmjopen-15-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/85e519f4d4f7/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/5a51982775d5/bmjopen-15-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/03a24e81003a/bmjopen-15-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/fbc2a65cd74c/bmjopen-15-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/85e519f4d4f7/bmjopen-15-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/5a51982775d5/bmjopen-15-6-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/03a24e81003a/bmjopen-15-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcd/12184387/fbc2a65cd74c/bmjopen-15-6-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial in three culturally different middle-income countries (ASSIST global): protocol for a randomised feasibility study.在三个文化背景不同的中等收入国家开展的学校戒烟试验(ASSIST全球):一项随机可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e096963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096963.
2
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
3
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
4
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
5
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub2.
6
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
8
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
9
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.支持孕期女性戒烟的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5.
10
Social Stories™ to alleviate challenging behaviour and social difficulties exhibited by children with autism spectrum disorder in mainstream schools: design of a manualised training toolkit and feasibility study for a cluster randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative and cost-effectiveness components.社交故事™减轻主流学校中自闭症谱系障碍儿童表现出的具有挑战性的行为和社交困难:一个手册化培训工具包的设计以及一项包含嵌套定性和成本效益成分的整群随机对照试验的可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jan;20(6):1-258. doi: 10.3310/hta20060.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.试验方案中报告结果的指南:SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版
JAMA. 2022 Dec 20;328(23):2345-2356. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243.
2
Patterns of tobacco use in low and middle income countries by tobacco product and sociodemographic characteristics: nationally representative survey data from 82 countries.中低收入国家按烟草制品和社会人口特征划分的吸烟模式:来自 82 个国家的全国代表性调查数据。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 30;378:e067582. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067582.
3
Childhood/Adolescent Smoking and Adult Smoking and Cessation: The International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort (i3C) Consortium.
儿童/青少年吸烟与成人吸烟和戒烟:国际儿童心血管队列研究(i3C)联盟。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014381. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014381. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
4
Diffusion of effects of the ASSIST school-based smoking prevention intervention to non-participating family members: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.ASSIST 学校预防吸烟干预对未参与家庭成员影响的扩散:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Addiction. 2020 May;115(5):986-991. doi: 10.1111/add.14862. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Socio-demographic inequalities in cigarette smoking in Indonesia, 2007 to 2014.印尼 2007 年至 2014 年期间,香烟消费的社会人口统计学不平等现象。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
6
Peer-led intervention to prevent and reduce STI transmission and improve sexual health in secondary schools (STASH): protocol for a feasibility study.同伴主导的干预措施以预防和减少性传播感染在中学的传播并改善性健康(STASH):一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 29;4:180. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0354-9. eCollection 2018.
7
Thirty-day smoking in adolescence is a strong predictor of smoking in young adulthood.青少年时期30天的吸烟行为是青年期吸烟的有力预测指标。
Prev Med. 2018 Apr;109:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家 84 种行为、环境和职业以及代谢风险或风险组合的比较风险评估,1990-2016 年:全球疾病负担研究 2016 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1345-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8.
9
Tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure in young adolescents aged 12-15 years: data from 68 low-income and middle-income countries.青少年(12-15 岁)的烟草使用和二手烟暴露:来自 68 个低收入和中等收入国家的数据。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e795-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30187-5. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
The low prevalence of female smoking in the developing world: gender inequality or maternal adaptations for fetal protection?发展中国家女性吸烟率低:是性别不平等还是为胎儿保护的母性适应?
Evol Med Public Health. 2016 Jul 4;2016(1):195-211. doi: 10.1093/emph/eow013. Print 2016.